YouTube appears to be removing content featuring or even merely reviewing the movie ‘Sound Of Freedom’ for ‘violating community guidelines’ as censorship of the anti-child trafficking movie continues.

Former Navy SEAL and CIA Contractor Shawn Ryan posted screenshots of the backend of his YouTube account, showing that a 2 and a half minute preview video of an upcoming interview with the film’s star Jim Caviezel has been removed.

YouTube has also declared the content titled ‘Actor Jim Caviezel Unveils Dark Truths Behind The Trafficking Of Children’ as ‘Ineligible’ for monetization.

YouTube pulled my preview of Jim Caviezel’s episode for “violating community guidelines”.

I did not realize saving children and bringing awareness to the sex trafficking of kids was against the community guidelines.#savethechildren #youtube #censorship pic.twitter.com/KI6yNbSStB

— Shawn Ryan (@ShawnRyan762) July 18, 2023

This doesn’t seem to be a one off.

More...

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/youtube-pulling-sound-freedom-interviews-reviews

Frankie is klong the long one . Haha

corey sellers wrote:

No real news here. The majority of Democrats absolutely adore murdering born and unborn children, so saving children from sex trafficking is not even on their radar. This would not even be a problem if the Democrats were a little more efficient at murdering children.

zitotczito wrote:

you can't believe this in your real life.

frankj1 wrote:

Democrats fight with zeal to have the right to an abortion. So if you have more abortions, you have less children that could be trafficked, simple equation.

zitotczito wrote:

Haha , Frank love it can’t wait to see it . Haha that’s what she said.

corey sellers wrote:

simpleton math, yes.

but you have to be bright enough to know there's an ocean of difference between believing in women's rights to make decisions for their own bodies, that you hate, and making such a disgusting charge about more than half the people in America (I'm changing your bile to anyone left of you) are actually rooting for babies and children to die and be exploited.

Do you also believe in the basement-less pizza parlor basement?
Or that all Liberals are pedophile cannibals?
I ask cuz your claims are hovering at those levels of lunacy.

frankj1 wrote:

Common sense, logic and proof loses to Zito's intermittent, angry, lunacy, filled-with-vile and hatred posts, all the time.
Word.

rfenst wrote:

I recently went to see the movie Sound Of Freedom with the expectation of a moderate level of political commentary or religious pontificating, given the rabid and widespread attacks on the film by the leftist media. All I knew going in was that the indie production was about child trafficking and that the mainstream media HATES IT. After the film was over, my first thought was that it was an excellent story about a very dark and difficult issue. My second thought was – “What the hell was all the fuss about? There’s not a single political moment in the entire movie!”

The media war on the low budget flick is so bizarre given this fact that I am immediately suspicious of their intentions. Not one political message, not one momentary critique of the political left, not one moment where MAGA or Trump or “Q-Anon” is mentioned, not one “conspiracy theory.” So why all the hate?

Before reading this review any further I highly recommend you check out some of the hatchet job articles published about Sound Of Freedom to get a sense of what I’m talking about – examples are here, here, here and here.

The first thing you’ll probably notice is that the majority of these vitriolic diatribes use the exact same talking points – They suggest that The Sound Of Freedom is based in conspiracy theory, far-right extremism and that it is funded by a subversive network of “Q-Anon adjacent” conservatives. Some journalists have even attacked the veracity of the film’s true story – the career of DHS agent Tim Ballard, who operated covertly to take down child sex traffickers in Central America.

More...

https://alt-market.us/journalists-attacking-the-film-sound-of-freedom-should-have-their-hard-drives-investigated/ 

sick boy.

frankj1 wrote:

The utter hypocrisy of Technocrats is astounding. The UN’s SDGs promise to save the world’s children and yet actual policies do just the opposite. Children are the most vulnerable group on earth because they are not able to defend themselves. Thus, they are trafficked, sexually exploited, injected, marginalized and in Africa, forced to work in harsh mining operations, such as cobalt mines. The depravity of man has no limits. ⁃ TN Editor

COBALT is essential to modern technology. All sorts of electronic devices rely on it, along with other elements such as lithium. Solar panels and electric vehicles (EVs) wouldn’t function without them. While the environmental degradation associated with both lithium and cobalt extraction is well established, the issues around cobalt are even more poignant because of the manner in which it is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

A new book, Cobalt Red: How the blood of the Congo powers our lives, published in January this year, details the human suffering, especially of children, directly involved in the mining. Written by a Nottingham University professor, Siddartha Kara, from first-hand knowledge gained by visiting the Congo, this is a book that should be required reading for every local authority that is implementing the Net Zero agenda. (You can read a review here). Professor Kara is a British Academy Global Professor and Rights Lab Associate Professor of Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery. He advises several UN agencies and numerous governments on anti-slavery policy and the law. We should take him seriously.

What happens in the Congo matters because it is the largest producer of cobalt, accounting for 70 per cent of global production. In 2022 there was a reported output of 130,000 tonnes; the next largest producer, Russia, mined 8,900 tonnes.

More...

https://www.technocracy.news/mining-cobalt-sacrifices-african-children-on-the-green-altar-of-technocracy/