It appears this cigar was released in the second half of 2023 and I've seen one review. Does that imply General Cigar made the edition for only STG subsidiaries? It is a troubling situation to find a cigar that has slipped under the radar. There must be a reason.

There seems to be a dearth of angst over this issue...sorry.

I for one haven't slept in days

Maybe the cigar was even worse than the other Sancho Panza offerings.

By mistake there has to be at least one decent one. Right?
Maybe this is it.

I used to smoke the double Maduros and Fuertes frequently till I saw the light of avoiding General and Atladas.

now Matt Booth is involved...yawn.

^ who…. Sounds like the tobacco is from Oliva and I’ve always been an Oliva fan. I’d try the cigar but I’m probably not gonna pay much for it

---

I smoked a bunch years ago.. haven't had one in a while... 😟

I gave up after the double maduros and triple anejos.

when I first arrived at this forum, I found the "Commonly Used Acronyms and Abbrev" thread. There was no line for : "SP = Sancho Panza". I got the message...

Non-Cuban Sancho Panza cigars have been sold in the US since 1981. Somebody must like them and be buying them. That's the thing with subjective things like cigars. One man's dog turd is another man's OPUS X. For that matter, OPUS X is a dog turd to a lot of people. I try to find a reviewer who my taste seems to agree with based on prior reviews and what I know I've liked. In an ideal world, my favorite cigar would be something everybody else hates. Think of the money I'd save buying the world's most disliked cigar. Price and good reviews (which may or may not be bought and paid for) are in no ways a guarantee that it will be a good cigar in your opinion. Evaluations of subjective things is for the most part an exercise in futility. However, back to my original post, to see no reviews is strange.

Anejo is spanish for aged. So how does a manufacturer triple age a cigar? That's a dumb name.

I think it's because tequila already laid claim to extra anejo