Lazygardner
23 years ago
Friday, March 28, 2003

Media Ignore Rep. Rangel's Slurs on U.S. Military

The mainstream media have ignored Rep. Charlie Rangel's near-treasonous attack on the U.S. military , in which he falsely charged that our armed forces are bombing innocent Iraqi women and children: Rangel Slams U.S. Troops as Child Killers.

A midday search of LexisNexis and Google News and the Web sites of the networks reveals no mention of Rangel's outrageous remarks on last night's "Hannity & Colmes" broadcast on Fox News Channel.

These same media giants raged for weeks about GOP Sen. Trent Lott's remarks about Strom Thurmond but have overlooked or even excused far worse remarks by leftist Democrats such as Sen. Patty "Osama Mama" Murray, Rep. Marcy Kaptur and now Rangel and Wanda Baucus, wife of Sen. Max Baucus.
Spiny Norman
23 years ago
""""A midday search of LexisNexis and Google News and the Web sites of the networks reveals no mention of Rangel's outrageous remarks on last night's "Hannity & Colmes" broadcast on Fox News Channel. """"

You know what's really strange? As of 1715 CST, there's no mention of it on SHAWN HANNITY'S SITE EITHER!
Spiny Norman
23 years ago
So you think he is ignoring himself?
usahog
23 years ago
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/3/27/220947 

Always look to Newsmax for the things that Media Removes....

Hog
usahog
23 years ago
btw scroll to the Bottom and read more news on the homefront against the Soldiers....


Hog
Spiny Norman
23 years ago
Oh yea, no bias there.....

I would'nt put much stock in what either had to say. Probably why the media missed it. They were doing something exciting like watching paint dry.
Robby
23 years ago
hummm, is your point that Rangals remarks are "totally acceptable?" Not inflamatory? or Incendeary? Right in line with your POV? A soul mate?
usahog
23 years ago
IMO I think Rangel and Doushal should step down...and there are a few others on the Senate floor whose way outlasted there need to be in there seats... even though Doushal tried to retract his remarks they Did come out of his mouth and weather there was a War on or Not... he is a Commie for thinking out loud in the Position he holds... and Rangel... he should know better being a Vet and all....

Spiny, Bias or not those were the Words He used Openly in front of Millions Televised...

Hog
Robby
23 years ago
They should be excoriated "literally" not figuratively...
RICKAMAVEN
23 years ago
sorry i don't see anything refering to child killers.

if that is what he said, he was refering to dim sun's desperate need for war. i see nothing denegrating our soldiers.

if that is the sum and substance of what he said, the reach to child killers is completely uncalled for.

i agree that daschle is a wimp, a weasel, a man of no substance. mispelling his name is childess and i doin't think he becomes a commie because of his aforementioned traits.

as a matter of fact, his wife is a lobbiest, i believe for the airlines, and i believe he voted the $15,000,00 to the airlines relief fund or he'd be back in the bathroom reading hustler, because his wife would have a lot of headaches
Robby
23 years ago
Rick, I didn't see the show, but I wouldn't put it past him... Besides, I still say they should be excoriated on general principle.
usahog
23 years ago
justforfun
23 years ago
Here's an email to Charlie Rangel I sent and his response:

Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Comments RE US Military

Shame, shame, shame.

I once thought relatively well of you. Given your recent comments on television last night, you should be deported to live permanently in Iraq.

TRAITOR!!!!


Response I received a few hours ago:

Recently, on the Hannity and Colmes TV show, Sean Hannity challenged my patriotism because I said, "I just don't believe that you bomb women and children in order to enforce something against a lying cheat."

50 years ago, I was a young American in combat, fighting the communists in North Korea. Our soldiers are brave young men and women just for being there, and I know they're scared, like I was. My heart truly goes out to them--and to their families--who I know are praying and worried to death.

Our troops don't know who is the enemy--whether they are men in uniforms or in street clothes. Our troops don't target men or women or children. They're in guerrilla warfare, and the only rule is to defend themselves. And no matter how much we do to pinpoint targets from the air, bombs don't know the difference between enemy troops and innocent people.

What Sean Hannity does not know, because he did not serve in the armed forces, is that soldiers obey the orders of the Commander-in-Chief. Our troops are doing that. But if we were not in this war, there would be no bombing at all, and it would not be necessary to consider the issue of "collateral damage."

Nothing is more precious to Americans than our freedom to speak out, to disagree. It's frightening that, in their passion for this war, some people are accusing anyone who opposes it of being unpatriotic. If members of Congress are going to be attacked for fulfilling their responsibility to their constituents to speak out on matters of war and peace, then we might as well tear up the Constitution.

I do not support the war, but I revere the troops, and I am drafting legislation that will show, in a tangible way, the country's appreciation for their sacrifice. The program will provide generous higher education and health care benefits, for the troops after their discharge, their spouses and children. For those who wish to go into business, it will provide the necessary resources.

Sean Hannity deliberately distorted my views on the program in his attempt to challenge my patriotism. I will continue speaking on behalf of my constituents and in defense of the Constitution. I will not be intimidated.
docrks
23 years ago
"Hate War ---- but Love the American Soldier --Got it?"

Gen. Hugh Moore (of "We Were Soldiers" fame)

said to Dan Rather and Mel Gibson on 60 Minutes
E-Chick
23 years ago
Rangle pissed off the wrong country...
Robby
23 years ago
I said it before he said this, he's a worthless P.O.S. (in so many words). His words speak better than any conviction I could possibly make...

"Engulfed by a firestorm of outrage over his comments suggesting that U.S. troops were deliberately killing women and children in Iraq, Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., said Friday that he should have been more careful with his words."

"There is no question that if I had a chance to reword that, that I would have done a much better job," the embattled Democrat told nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity."

He's a worthless P.O.S that showed his true colors in an extemporaneous comment to the media and now he's trying to retract it... he should be hung by his... Let's just say "thumbs". Opposing views welcomed. Please! Rickamavan? Cwelmie? Anywone!!?? PLEASE!! TRY TO DEFEND THIS POS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COME ON, BRING IT...
Robby
23 years ago
I could make horible, horible comments that could offend many people and then retract them after the fact, would that undo what I had said? Or would it be a cheap attempt to redeem myself?
Robby
23 years ago
Spiney? Rick? Cwhelmi? Anyone?
Robby
23 years ago
standing by...
Robby
23 years ago
waiting patiently...
Users browsing this topic