America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by frankj1. 155 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
WAL-MART Costs Taxpayers $1,557,000,000,00 to Support its Employees
Stinkdyr Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
FuzzNJ wrote:
One, the situation today is not the same as it was back then. We have tons more safety nets thanks to FDR that protect the population that saved the US from heading into another depression during the Bush administration.

Two, what did the Bush administration do? That's right. Federal money spent on bailouts, proping up the economy with Federal dollars, trillions of it actually. Through tons of 1 day loans to banks and direct bailout money. No private sector jobs were created there either.

Why did those banks fail so badly? Speculation and less regulation and letting banks and investment companies merge through more deregulation and less over-sight.

We all have to deal with government bs in one way or another, you're not special. Your small business is NOTHING, does not even register, is just a piece of sand in the grand scale of things.

Seriously read some more books, even some that might not preach back to you the point of view you want to hear. You may actually learn something.



Fuzzy you are pathetic. Your defense of Osamabama is to say, "well Bush was a socialist too."

Brick wall
gringococolo Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
gringococolo 49

if i'm not mistaken your employer pays half of your soc sec and you pay half.
does that sound right?

since i have been self employed sinc 1973, i have paid both .

does that mean you want thanks for your half and thanks to your
employer for the other half.




You know I am just yanking your chain Rick...

Since the government has been my employer since 1989 I have obviously been costing us more than most...


Gringo - loves the teat. I also know that the teat can dry up, hopefully I have a little job security because of my trade.

I will honestly say I still am doing everything I can to invest for my own furture. I believe the govt will cut into my Marine Corps retirement check. I believe they will cut social security. I believe they will continue to raise taxes. They have to get medicare spending under control.

If I thought the Euro was the currency of the future, I would be putting my money there. I am terrified of the prospects of the dollar. I like Norway as a place to put some cash. If the place wasn't freezing cold, I would put a lot of money into that country.

Hockeydad is making his bets on globalism. I am making mine on the fed govt not going broke.


Irony is a bitch.


Thank you, thank you.
DadZilla3 Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
rfenst wrote:
I cannot agree with such a blanket, harsh statement. It is not that simple. Sure, there are people sucking off the system just because it works for them. There will always be some and there will be nothing we can do about it. But, those who feed them are just as responsible, if not more. No one has been "watching the store". It took our country roughly 225 years to get to this point. I think the solution is going to take another 4-5 generations (perhaps 50 years or more) until the change permeates and becomes our entire culture.

It took only since LBJ's 'Great Society' legislation in 1965 to get to this point. Previously, if you wanted to eat or at least eat reasonably well, you worked. The current entitlement mentality could change almost overnight...just mandate that nobody on Welfare votes. Politicians who traditionally pandered to that particular monolithic voting block by distributing freebies at middle class taxpayers' expense will suddenly find something else to do besides social engineering.

Like, they can devote the time they previously spent scheming how to further redistribute middle class income, and instead get busy getting American industry back on its feet and provide some education, jobs, and some self-respect for those folks previously 'unemployable'.

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
dpnewell #99 repeat two more times


"employees really do end up paying for all
those employer taxes in reduced wages"

of course they do.

then why is soc sec insurance, an anuity
paid for by the beneficiary, considered by
so many as an entitlement, sucking from the
teat of the government.
snowwolf777 Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
dpnewell #99 repeat two more times


"employees really do end up paying for all
those employer taxes in reduced wages"

of course they do.

then why is soc sec insurance, an anuity
paid for by the beneficiary, considered by
so many as an entitlement, sucking from the
teat of the government.



I can help you with that one. It's considered "sucking from the teat of government" in all those cases where those 30 year old chicks who tip the scales at 4 bills are collecting it via permanent disablity for their "bad back". The 20-somethings like my secretary's baby daddy who has "rage issues", needs medical marijuana and is on "permanent disablity" due to his inablity to get along with co-workers. So he's collecting social security because he "can't work".

Plenty more where that came from if you need it.
borndead1 Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
Wal Mart doesn't "cost" the taxpayer this money...government policy takes money from taxpayers to fund these social programs.

That being said...I am not a fan of Wal Mart and I refuse to shop there.
stogiemonger Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2009
Posts: 4,185

I'm wearing George right now.
ZRX1200 Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Im going to walmart....anyone need anything?
rfenst Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,382
snowwolf777 wrote:
I can help you with that one. It's considered "sucking from the teat of government" in all those cases where those 30 year old chicks who tip the scales at 4 bills are collecting it via permanent disablity for their "bad back". The 20-somethings like my secretary's baby daddy who has "rage issues", needs medical marijuana and is on "permanent disablity" due to his inablity to get along with co-workers. So he's collecting social security because he "can't work".

Plenty more where that came from if you need it.


FWIW, it takes a hell of a lot lot more than mere subjective "complaints" of a back pain to get SSDI. And, perhaps the rage issues are a symptom of serious, organic, incurable, mental illness. If it is marijuana rather than Valium, Xanax or lithium, for example that works best for him, who gives a ****?

In reality, most doctors are very leery of, and uncooperative with, people seeking medical support for SSDI claims. They don't just sign-off for everybody, each time they are asked to. Unless you have a condition that is on a definite list and will last longer than one year or is terminal, there are significant "hoops to jump through". Often, claimants must get approval from a SSDI doctor as well.

Look, I am not saying that there aren't people scamming SSDI. Of course there are! In fact, I am certain there are plenty. But, legitimately going from a $25-50k per year job to approximately $1-1.5k monthly benefit check (which may be taxable) is "no picnic" for most. Eligibility for SSDI requires a condition that will render one totally disabled for a minimum of one year. Thereafter, recipients cases can be reviewed and mandatory medical exams can be required to verify ongoing entitlement.

Besides, I'd rather pay for some cheats than see legitimately disabled people get denied their benefit.






Papachristou Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!

we had an accountant (left leaning in two ways) claim work stress (he works 8-5) and checked himself into a clinic. He was able to draw 70% of his check for 3 months, maybe six i forgot how long he has been gone, through some federal program. anyway, he kept promising he would be back so the department couldnt hire anyone forcing everyone else to work saturdays, stay later etc. sure enough on the last day when he had to come back to work, he quit or didnt show and is now trying to draw unemployment. but i think turned down b/c he was a no show.

i guess there are always examples, im not sure how many people that program helps who were in car accidents or something like that... i guess its hard to say. i guess we all just hate to see people abusing the benefits we all work so hard for.
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Papachristou wrote:
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!





that's alot of cheese.... Mellow
Papachristou Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
ah just print some more right?
DrafterX Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
no.. I was talking about LE 'Premium' Gub-ment cheese... Mellow
ZRX1200 Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Now your talking!
dstieger Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I can't hear you! Lalalalalala! I'm sorry, boys. but if you want to hurt the Wall*Mart, you'll have to go through me!

gringococolo Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
Papachristou wrote:
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!

we had an accountant (left leaning in two ways) claim work stress (he works 8-5) and checked himself into a clinic. He was able to draw 70% of his check for 3 months, maybe six i forgot how long he has been gone, through some federal program. anyway, he kept promising he would be back so the department couldnt hire anyone forcing everyone else to work saturdays, stay later etc. sure enough on the last day when he had to come back to work, he quit or didnt show and is now trying to draw unemployment. but i think turned down b/c he was a no show.

i guess there are always examples, im not sure how many people that program helps who were in car accidents or something like that... i guess its hard to say. i guess we all just hate to see people abusing the benefits we all work so hard for.



Probably state, not federal. 70% of wages also seems suspicious. But you seem to exaggerate a lot with vague internet facts strewn about.

Your claim that they "couldn't hire anyone" is also doubtful. Most states will alow you to hire someone to do lost work, just not fire or reduce the hours of the "injured" or "sick" employee.

If you are a fairly large company the only federal program I can think of if the FMLA. Since you really don't know what was wrong with this person, then it can't be ruled out although it's doubtful he qualified for FMLA. Still isn't 70% of wages.


BS called again.


borndead1 Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
Papachristou wrote:
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!

we had an accountant (left leaning in two ways) claim work stress (he works 8-5) and checked himself into a clinic. He was able to draw 70% of his check for 3 months, maybe six i forgot how long he has been gone, through some federal program. anyway, he kept promising he would be back so the department couldnt hire anyone forcing everyone else to work saturdays, stay later etc. sure enough on the last day when he had to come back to work, he quit or didnt show and is now trying to draw unemployment. but i think turned down b/c he was a no show.

i guess there are always examples, im not sure how many people that program helps who were in car accidents or something like that... i guess its hard to say. i guess we all just hate to see people abusing the benefits we all work so hard for.



Short term disability. It's optional with most health insurance plans. Pays 70% for up to 6 months. Then you either go back to work or apply for long term disability.
FuzzNJ Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Papachristou wrote:
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!



I saw that, or heard it in the background and I believe it was food stamp assistance.
borndead1 Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
I saw that, or heard it in the background and I believe it was food stamp assistance.


Check yo' head, cuz I'm about to get deep.

It's obvious that "the family unit" is not as strong as it used be. I believe that this is a direct result of decades of welfare and entitlement programs. Families simply do not have to depend on each other anymore. They don't have to help each other anymore. Hell, many people won't even ASK another family member for help. They just get on food stamps/welfare. This has driven a wedge between families.

Imagine a family falling on hard times. Their extended family (parents, siblings) each chips in a few bucks a week to help them out (while also putting pressure on them to get their s**t together). There's security in that. Knowing that your family has your back and you have theirs. This makes families stronger. It doesn't happen anymore. Families don't have to depend on each other. They can just get welfare.
rfenst Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,382
gringococolo wrote:
Probably state, not federal. 70% of wages also seems suspicious. But you seem to exaggerate a lot with vague internet facts strewn about.

Your claim that they "couldn't hire anyone" is also doubtful. Most states will alow you to hire someone to do lost work, just not fire or reduce the hours of the "injured" or "sick" employee.

If you are a fairly large company the only federal program I can think of if the FMLA. Since you really don't know what was wrong with this person, then it can't be ruled out although it's doubtful he qualified for FMLA. Still isn't 70% of wages.


BS called again.




The only way I have ever seen an injured/disabled person collect more than 66 2/3% of their gross income is when they have had their own short term disability insurance and/or then collect more for income loss under their no-fault auto insurance. Years ago, one client was getting something in the range of 120+% for a short period of time and there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. he had paid both premiums and neither insurer prohibited it. Notwithstanding this, he still couldn't wait to get back to work. ..

I also had a client who had to tenaciously fight his former employer's disability insurer "tooth and nail" on his disability claim- based on anxiety/depression per his psychiatrist. They kept jerking him a round and cutting him off. He lost his $70k/year job, but only got about $2k per month in benefits. His attorney had to constantly fight to keep his benefits from being cut-off. If you had seen him in a restaurant or at a grocery store, you would think he was just fine. About 10 days ago, his mother called me to ask if I had ever prepared a will for him. He committed suicide the day before and they wanted to know whether he wished to be buried or cremated...
FuzzNJ Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
borndead1 wrote:
Check yo' head, cuz I'm about to get deep.

It's obvious that "the family unit" is not as strong as it used be. I believe that this is a direct result of decades of welfare and entitlement programs. Families simply do not have to depend on each other anymore. They don't have to help each other anymore. Hell, many people won't even ASK another family member for help. They just get on food stamps/welfare. This has driven a wedge between families.

Imagine a family falling on hard times. Their extended family (parents, siblings) each chips in a few bucks a week to help them out (while also putting pressure on them to get their s**t together). There's security in that. Knowing that your family has your back and you have theirs. This makes families stronger. It doesn't happen anymore. Families don't have to depend on each other. They can just get welfare.


I think you may be confusing cause vs effect here. There are an awful lot of different things that have lead to families no longer all living together or relying on one another as much as they used to, not the least of which is ease of travel making it a helluva lot easier to move for jobs or whatever reason. Longer life spans, better health, smaller families, less agrarian families etc.

Your 'theory' is much too simplistic and influenced heavily by your attitude toward 'welfare'.
borndead1 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
Your 'theory' is much too simplistic and influenced heavily by your attitude toward 'welfare'.




You sure come across like a ****** sometimes. Actually, most of the time. So, since you would rather call me a simpleton than DISCUSS, I can play along.


Ease of travel? Longer life spans? Are you f**king serious? That's your 'theory' of why the family unit is not what it used to be?
FuzzNJ Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
borndead1 wrote:
You sure come across like a ****** sometimes. Actually, most of the time. So, since you would rather call me a simpleton than DISCUSS, I can play along.


Ease of travel? Longer life spans? Are you f**king serious? That's your 'theory' of why the family unit is not what it used to be?


I did not call you a simpleton and I did discuss. Good lord you are a sensitive one.
borndead1 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
I did not call you a simpleton and I did discuss. Good lord you are a sensitive one.


The last sentence of your post was condescending and you know it. Come on, man.
FuzzNJ Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
borndead1 wrote:
The last sentence of your post was condescending and you know it. Come on, man.


Dude, you are being extremely sensitive, seriously. Saying that the breakdown of the family unit's strength is due to welfare programs is a simplistic way of looking at it as it does not take into consideration a host of other factors. Welfare in the US was started in the 1930's. A whole lot has happened in that time, many of those things I listed, but there are even more. Easier divorces, more women in the workplace, no need to have larger families because you don't need to have a workforce for your family farm, birth control and on and on.

Saying it's a simplistic way of looking at the situation is not calling you simple minded. Had I wanted to do that, I would have. And saying you might be thinking this way because of the way you feel about welfare is, I think a valid observation made in the hopes you might consider it and open your mind to additional possibilities.
gringococolo Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
Fuzz. I agree with your sexist view that women working instead of being home as mothers has greatly contributed to the decline of family. But I think that all those progressive people you worship would not appreciate our views.

Women are the stronger creatures. It is up to the stronger one to keep the family unit on pace and in check.
teedubbya Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Papachristou wrote:
CNN this weekend... 1/6 Americans on welfare (46 million)! hooray!!!

we had an accountant (left leaning in two ways) claim work stress (he works 8-5) and checked himself into a clinic. He was able to draw 70% of his check for 3 months, maybe six i forgot how long he has been gone, through some federal program. anyway, he kept promising he would be back so the department couldnt hire anyone forcing everyone else to work saturdays, stay later etc. sure enough on the last day when he had to come back to work, he quit or didnt show and is now trying to draw unemployment. but i think turned down b/c he was a no show.

i guess there are always examples, im not sure how many people that program helps who were in car accidents or something like that... i guess its hard to say. i guess we all just hate to see people abusing the benefits we all work so hard for.



You sure seem to think you know an awful lot of details about this persons personal business. My guess is there is a thing or two you do not know. Their reason for being out (whatever it is) is likely very different than you know and if someone is telling you exactly what they are being paid while out that person needs to be fired. If it's the "left leaning" faker bragging to you then they are just stupid but also likely less than honest to you.

I don't put much weight in the story. But then again I'm not a chick and normally don't get all up in folks personal business. It sounds more like gossip than fact. The hens are clucking.

Key Lime Water is BACK!!!!
Papachristou Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
rfenst wrote:
The only way I have ever seen an injured/disabled person collect more than 66 2/3% of their gross income is when they have had their own short term disability insurance and/or then collect more for income loss under their no-fault auto insurance. Years ago, one client was getting something in the range of 120+% for a short period of time and there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. he had paid both premiums and neither insurer prohibited it. Notwithstanding this, he still couldn't wait to get back to work. ..

I also had a client who had to tenaciously fight his former employer's disability insurer "tooth and nail" on his disability claim- based on anxiety/depression per his psychiatrist. They kept jerking him a round and cutting him off. He lost his $70k/year job, but only got about $2k per month in benefits. His attorney had to constantly fight to keep his benefits from being cut-off. If you had seen him in a restaurant or at a grocery store, you would think he was just fine. About 10 days ago, his mother called me to ask if I had ever prepared a will for him. He committed suicide the day before and they wanted to know whether he wished to be buried or cremated...


now thats arguing details. we are talking 3.5% difference. Maybe the HR manager who told me he was collecting 70% rounded up the 3.5%?

We all have problems, I still go to work everyday as do you.

edit-3.33%. my mistake, i want to get that right so you dont jump on the .17% difference.


gringococolo wrote:
Probably state, not federal. 70% of wages also seems suspicious. But you seem to exaggerate a lot with vague internet facts strewn about.

Your claim that they "couldn't hire anyone" is also doubtful. Most states will alow you to hire someone to do lost work, just not fire or reduce the hours of the "injured" or "sick" employee.

If you are a fairly large company the only federal program I can think of if the FMLA. Since you really don't know what was wrong with this person, then it can't be ruled out although it's doubtful he qualified for FMLA. Still isn't 70% of wages.


BS called again.





Yes, it was FMLA. I couldnt remember the name of the program. The only BS is on you.






teedubbya wrote:
You sure seem to think you know an awful lot of details about this persons personal business. My guess is there is a thing or two you do not know. Their reason for being out (whatever it is) is likely very different than you know and if someone is telling you exactly what they are being paid while out that person needs to be fired. If it's the "left leaning" faker bragging to you then they are just stupid but also likely less than honest to you.

I don't put much weight in the story. But then again I'm not a chick and normally don't get all up in folks personal business. It sounds more like gossip than fact. The hens are clucking.

Key Lime Water is BACK!!!!



no, i dont know a whole lot but i know how he would file HR claims when straight people talked about their personal lives then come into work hung over and talk about his sex life. I dont really care either way, the point is, no one is his family died, he has plenty o money, he wasnt injured or hurt. hey, like i said, we all have personal issues/problems but you need to toughen up and get through it. take a vacation, whatever. but hanging your company and fellow worker out to dry is not ethical. if you cant come back to work, get on perm disability and let us hire someone else.

you can put weight on the story or not. He used to work 20ft from my office. that would be a pretty random story to make up i would think but hey, we dont know how far your imagination goes i guess.
teedubbya Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Papachristou wrote:
no, i dont know a whole lot but i know how he would file HR claims when straight people talked about their personal lives then come into work hung over and talk about his sex life. I dont really care either way, the point is, no one is his family died, he has plenty o money, he wasnt injured or hurt. hey, like i said, we all have personal issues/problems but you need to toughen up and get through it. take a vacation, whatever. but hanging your company and fellow worker out to dry is not ethical. if you cant come back to work, get on perm disability and let us hire someone else.

you can put weight on the story or not. He used to work 20ft from my office. that would be a pretty random story to make up i would think but hey, we dont know how far your imagination goes i guess.



The point is you really know nothing about their situation medically or financially. And that was the bulk of your story.

I hope I am wrong, but as you go through life you will probably run accross a loved one or you yourself will experience depression or some sort of mental illness. I'd bet your tune will change on the toughen up and get through it part. You sound like I did many years ago...... other than the thinking you knew what others are doing. You really have no idea and through the gossip channels a story is being created. To make it worse you don't like the person so when you fill in the gaps its pretty easy to predict what you fill them with.
Papachristou Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
TD, the kid is 25. i know for a fact he checked into a depression clinic because he had it on his facebook and was bragging about how he was enjoying kicking back on the government dime.

life is tough, there are ups and downs but my point is you still have to get through it. he doesnt have any real problems. He is 25, had a good job, etc. IF he had a real problem, IE disease, loved one sick that required his full time attention etc, i would be concerned with his wellness. I wouldnt want to see anyone suffer. My grandfather is 85 and lives 1000 miles away. he is the most important influence on my life and i know his time is very limited. However, when the time comes for him to take that journey we all will make, i will take my couple days leave and maybe a few more to help my Yaya get situated and come back to life/work/reality. Thats just how it goes.

i think this is a great example of why the US is slipping so fast. we refuse to accept that life will not be peachy for everyone. there will be trouble and difficulty that will require some to dig in, work harder and things still not go their way. we are being crushed with debt but both dems and repubs put on a show of cutting debt. Even if you combined both dems and repub cuts thats right at $100b. We are going in debt that much every 25 days. To begin to fix this issue, we will have to make REAL, DRASTIC and PAINFUL cuts that will affect many millions of people. It will cause loss of jobs, pensions (or large reductions of said pensions) increased cost of healthcare etc. Healthcare isnt free and it isnt a right (well thats my opinion, some digress) but it does cost money and that has to come from somewhere. and dont even get me started on the 2.5 wars we are fighting for some unknown cause.
gringococolo Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
FMLA doesn't pay wages. The company or state unemployment insurance does.

FMLA just grants up to 12 weeks of UNPAID leave per year.

The employer can actually elect for you to use all your accumulated leave prior to your use of FMLA leave.

Also if your company does not have 50 or more employees then FMLA does not apply.


Once again sir, I am merely stating that I know of no FEDERAL program that pays WAGES. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.


Don't take it personal, I understand your sentiment - hell I probably agree with it. I just call BS when I see it.
Papachristou Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
gringo ah gringo. we are arguing minut details. whether its wages or leave, he still gets money he does not deserve. it doesnt matter if its federal, company or insurance money, its clearly a situation of someone abusing safeguards put in place to protect people who geniunely need them. yes, i do remember hearing he had to use his vacation/choicetime days first. which he would have been entitled to anyway since he has earned them.

im sorry i have been incorrect on a few trival details but the principle/ideal is still the same.


there is no BS, as that is a fabrication or outright lie, neither of which are present here. so keep "calling" BS as you "see" it because its the same as someone sitting in the top tier at a game calling fouls as they "see" them.
teedubbya Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
There are also the minute details that you have zero facts on his medical condition and zero facts as to if/how he is getting paid and how much. You have a bunch of assumptions based on very little facts.

And if (IF) he really has depression you have demonstrated zero knowledge about the reality of the disease.

FuzzNJ Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
teedubbya wrote:
There are also the minute details that you have zero facts on his medical condition and zero facts as to if/how he is getting paid and how much. You have a bunch of assumptions based on very little facts.

And if (IF) he really has depression you have demonstrated zero knowledge about the reality of the disease.



C'mon, it isn't a disease. All you gotta do is just cheer up. The guy had a job and stuff, what does he have to be drepressed about? Just snap out of it! Sarcasm
HockeyDad Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,169
You had me going until I saw that little sarcasm thingie.
DrafterX Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
a little waterboarding and the depression thing will go right away.... Mellow
borndead1 Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
Dude, you are being extremely sensitive, seriously. Saying that the breakdown of the family unit's strength is due to welfare programs is a simplistic way of looking at it as it does not take into consideration a host of other factors. Welfare in the US was started in the 1930's. A whole lot has happened in that time, many of those things I listed, but there are even more. Easier divorces, more women in the workplace, no need to have larger families because you don't need to have a workforce for your family farm, birth control and on and on.

Saying it's a simplistic way of looking at the situation is not calling you simple minded. Had I wanted to do that, I would have. And saying you might be thinking this way because of the way you feel about welfare is, I think a valid observation made in the hopes you might consider it and open your mind to additional possibilities.



I will concede the divorce thing to you. But I still stand by my assertion that government dependence/government interference has played a bigger role than the other things you listed.
Papachristou Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
DrafterX wrote:
a little waterboarding and the depression thing will go right away.... Mellow


ha, im sure it would help keep things in perspective. i think he needs to sit in a session with R. Lee Ermey like in the geico commercial! Herfing
gringococolo Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
Papa,

Used to be around here that I wouldn't be the only one calling BS on blanket statements as your origional post. But honestly it has become outright silly here. The thing is, I really do understand your sentiment and somewhat agreee with the spirit of the post. I just find every single sentence as lacking in anything factual. You seem to call it "minor details". OK "minor details" on every sentence in the paragraph.

It really isn't personal, it's proffessional.

There isn't one side or the other (left or right) that I will not call BS on. There isn't one argument I wont take on if I think that there are misrepresentations of fact reguardless if I am on the side of the argument or not. I have done it many times - to a fault.

But whatever, we all have our faults. I am no angel nor a genius. I know what I know, but more importantly I know what I don't know.



It really is an arguement about gossip that you have presented here for the sake of complaining about both lefties and entitlement programs. I get that, I just found the gossip lacking. Next time just put "I heard" in front of the gossip, then you won't have to actually defend anything. ---- No charge for that little tip there!
DrafterX Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
gringococolo wrote:
Next time just put "I heard" in front of the gossip, then you won't have to actually defend anything. ---- No charge for that little tip there!



Laugh

ThumpUp
HockeyDad Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,169
People rely on others way too much for facts.

Make you own!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
98.2% of people just make up their own.
teedubbya Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard the dude got 98.2% of his pay just for faking depression (according to the pay stubs of his I saw and his medical records). the bastid. did I tell you about him being gay (I saw him sucky-sucky) and a leftie in other ways too (catching the gay means leftie.... that goes without saying). I gots his numbah. I've put a lot of effort into knowing all his exact details so I could diagnose the ills of society. Its all facts man.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
Wash that down with a Key Lime spritzerFrying pan
teedubbya Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Wash that down with a Key Lime spritzerFrying pan


already done. I waterboarded myself with it. I hear its a cure for depression. Instead of enhanced interrogation it's being renamed just get happy.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
A whole lot of lovin' is what they'll be bringing...c'mon get happy...c'mon get hap-pee!Beer
teedubbya Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
they replaced the key lime with get happy flavah flave!
DrafterX Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I don't think your saltwater enemas count as waterboarding..... Mellow
Cigaroholic Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 05-14-2011
Posts: 9
Walmart is the apitamey of capitalism. Don't like it? Maybe those who don't like it, believe in some form of socialism then? Socialism is a fail system, created by failures, for failures.

You got to love all the people who whine and cry when someone evolves a business into a multi-billion dollar operation, and reaps the profits/rewards from doing so. It's a dog eat dog world in the world of capitalism. Either compete or be eaten alive.

Likewise, tell me that these "mom & pop" joints wouldn't do the same thing if they where capable of turning their local business into a multi-billion dollar, global business? Everyone wants to do well for themselves, you cannot knock someone for doing so, just because you have not done it yourself.

If you're for capitalism and knocking them, gtfo. If you're against capitalism, gtfo.


I'm sure they pull off plenty of loophole tax cheats, which I don't agree with. On the basis of them being a highly capitalized business, capable of using their finances to leverage competition in their favor, you simply can't use that against them.
rfenst Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,382
Papachristou wrote:
now thats arguing details. we are talking 3.5% difference. Maybe the HR manager who told me he was collecting 70% rounded up the 3.5%?

We all have problems, I still go to work everyday as do you.

edit-3.33%. my mistake, i want to get that right so you dont jump on the .17% difference.



I am not arguing with you about details or at all. Others are- but not myself. All I wrote about was my observations and experiences. Stop thinking I attacked/argued inconsequential details with you- that was not my intention.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>