America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by Brewha. 184 replies replies.
4 Pages1234>
The very angry first lady Michelle Obama
jetblasted Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595

Michelle’s back, and she’s madder than ever. She was already pretty angry, seemingly unhappy with just about everything. As her husband wrapped up the Democratic nomination in 2008, she let fly her real feelings: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country.” A few months into her job as first lady, her French counterpart asked how she liked the gig: “Don’t ask!” she reportedly spat. “It’s hell. I can’t stand it!”

She even seems to be mad at her silver-tongued husband. When the two were to set off on a luxurious 10-day vacation to Martha’s Vineyard, she left early - four hours early - and flew up alone. And those private vacations. She’s traveled to some of the world’s most plush resorts, taking 42 days off in the past year - that’d be eight weeks of vacay time if she held down a normal job.

Now, she is ready to spew her bilious disgust with America on the campaign trail. A dignified, transcendent first lady? No chance. Michelle is going to break with a hundred years of tradition and play the role of attack dog, heaping derision on her husband’s political opponents like no other first lady before her.

And it’s already begun. Mad Michelle this week popped down to Davis Island, Fla., to hobnob with the very people her husband despises - the 1 percent. At a massive mansion on the bay, filled with the wealthiest of the wealthy, America’s first lady launched into a tirade about “them” - the Republicans.

“Let’s not forget about what it meant when my husband appointed two brilliant Supreme Court justices, and for the first time in history, our daughters - and our sons - watched three women take their seats on our nation’s highest court. But more importantly, let’s not forget the impact their decisions will have on our lives for decades to come - on our privacy and our security, on whether we can speak freely, worship openly and love whomever we choose. That is what’s at stake here,” she said to applause.

Yes, Republicans hope to regain the White House so they can install Supreme Court justices who will trample Americans’ privacy, ignore the nation’s security, crush free speech and persecute the religious.

Oh, and they’re rich and racist to boot. “Will we be a country where opportunity is limited to just the few at the top? Who are we? Or will we give every child a chance to succeed no matter where they’re from, or what they look like or how much money their parents have. Who are we?”

That’s right, rich people (white, of course) certainly don’t want black people to succeed. They want to squelch success based on what people look like, how much money they have. “Are we going to let them succeed?” the first lady yelled. “Nooo!” the rich white people screamed.

Just as her husband’s re-election strategy is inanely simplistic - blame the Republicans for thwarting his brilliant, economy-saving policies - so too is the first lady’s. She will go to the opulent homes of rich people across the country to tell them how rich people are to blame for America’s woes and guilt them into giving millions for her husband’s campaign.

And the Princeton graduate will tell supporters they simply can’t comprehend the significance of what’s occurring today in America.

“It can be hard to see clearly what’s at stake - because these issues are so complicated, and quite frankly, folks are busy and they’re tired. We’re raising families and working full-time jobs, and many helping out in their own communities on top of all that. So many of us just don’t have the time to follow the news and to sort through all the back-and-forth, and to figure out how all of this stuff connects to our daily lives.”

Yes, only Michelle and her husband can truly understand, although she often tells those uninformed people that when the president returns from one of his campaign trips, “He says, ‘You won’t believe what folks are going through.’ ” So maybe she is the only person in America who understands.

So, America’s first lady will travel the country this election season to tell her fellow Americans just how bad it is out there (between lavish vacations, of course). Unlike President Ronald Reagan, who saw morning in America - that great shining city on a hill - Michelle will tell all who will listen that Republicans want to poison the air and water, stifle free speech, oppress the religious. She will offer not an uplifting vision of what her husband’s America could be but only a vapid view of what Republicans’ America would be.

That is the America she lives in, and by campaign’s end, it will be clear that she’s no longer “proud of my country.” Maybe she never really was. 

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/30/curl-the-very-angry-first-lady/?page=all
dubleuhb Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
She is and always will be a classless biotch.
tailgater Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Fat-azzed va jay jay.

I dry heave whenever I see her. But only because she's not worth the stomach bile that I'd normally puke up at such a disgusting creature.

With appologies to all the other disgusting creatures out there, of course.

pdxstogieman Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
Posters 2 and 3, all politics aside your comments are low class sludge.
ZRX1200 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
I don't think she ever wanted the job quite frankly.

DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
pdxstogieman wrote:
Posters 2 and 3, all politics aside your comments are low class sludge.




sludge is kinda vague... can you be a little more specific..?? Huh
pdxstogieman Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrafterX wrote:
sludge is kinda vague... can you be a little more specific..?? Huh


Sludge is actually pretty specific. Doesn't take an expansive vocabulary to know what it means. Try and think of any context in which you've ever heard the word that was complimentary.

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Sludge refers to the residual, semi-solid material left from industrial wastewater, or sewage treatment processes. It can also refer to the settled suspension obtained from conventional drinking water treatment, and numerous other industrial processes. The term is also sometimes used as a generic term for solids separated from suspension in a liquid; this 'soupy' material usually contains significant quantities of 'interstitial' water (between the solid particles).

When fresh sewage or wastewater is added to a settling tank, approximately 50% of the suspended solid matter will settle out in an hour and a half. This collection of solids is known as raw sludge or primary solids and is said to be "fresh" before anaerobic processes become active. The sludge will become putrescent in a short time once anaerobic bacteria take over, and must be removed from the sedimentation tank before this happens.

This is accomplished in one of two ways. In an Imhoff tank, fresh sludge is passed through a slot to the lower story or digestion chamber where it is decomposed by anaerobic bacteria, resulting in liquefaction and reduced volume of the sludge. After digesting for an extended period, the result is called "digested" sludge and may be disposed of by drying and then landfilling. More commonly with domestic sewage, the fresh sludge is continuously extracted from the tank mechanically and passed to separate sludge digestion tanks that operate at higher temperatures than the lower story of the Imhoff tank and, as a result, digest much more rapidly and efficiently.

Excess solids from biological processes such as activated sludge may still be referred to as sludge, but the term biosolids, is more commonly used to refer to the material, particularly after further processing such as aerobic composting. Industrial wastewater solids are also referred to as sludge, whether generated from biological or physical-chemical processes. Surface water plants also generate sludge made up of solids removed from the raw water.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

dubleuhb Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
pdxstogieman wrote:
Posters 2 and 3, all politics aside your comments are low class sludge.

Call it as I see it. Someone who wants to be in that position and can hold such contempt for anyone she disagrees with and show it publicly is classless to say the least. You get what you give mr man.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
pdxstogieman wrote:
Sludge is actually pretty specific. Doesn't take an expansive vocabulary to know what it means. Try and think of any context in which you've ever heard the word that was complimentary.

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Sludge refers to the residual, semi-solid material left from industrial wastewater, or sewage treatment processes. It can also refer to the settled suspension obtained from conventional drinking water treatment, and numerous other industrial processes. The term is also sometimes used as a generic term for solids separated from suspension in a liquid; this 'soupy' material usually contains significant quantities of 'interstitial' water (between the solid particles).

When fresh sewage or wastewater is added to a settling tank, approximately 50% of the suspended solid matter will settle out in an hour and a half. This collection of solids is known as raw sludge or primary solids and is said to be "fresh" before anaerobic processes become active. The sludge will become putrescent in a short time once anaerobic bacteria take over, and must be removed from the sedimentation tank before this happens.

This is accomplished in one of two ways. In an Imhoff tank, fresh sludge is passed through a slot to the lower story or digestion chamber where it is decomposed by anaerobic bacteria, resulting in liquefaction and reduced volume of the sludge. After digesting for an extended period, the result is called "digested" sludge and may be disposed of by drying and then landfilling. More commonly with domestic sewage, the fresh sludge is continuously extracted from the tank mechanically and passed to separate sludge digestion tanks that operate at higher temperatures than the lower story of the Imhoff tank and, as a result, digest much more rapidly and efficiently.

Excess solids from biological processes such as activated sludge may still be referred to as sludge, but the term biosolids, is more commonly used to refer to the material, particularly after further processing such as aerobic composting. Industrial wastewater solids are also referred to as sludge, whether generated from biological or physical-chemical processes. Surface water plants also generate sludge made up of solids removed from the raw water.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^





ahh yes... the stuff the First lady dumped on the white house grounds that killed her garden and had to excavated.... I remember now... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
dubleuhb wrote:
Call it as I see it. Someone who wants to be in that position and can hold such contempt for anyone she disagrees with and show it publicly is classless to say the least. You get what you give mr man.


irony
dubleuhb Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
teedubbya wrote:
irony

No, I don't hold contempt for anyone here, could care less on your political views. I do however think the first lady should put her politics aside and act as the first lady should. This one hasn't, she uses her position to vacation on every one's dime and spew her liberal diatribe whenever she gets a chance, NOT what a first lady should be doing.
teedubbya Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
lol
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I heard she eats like 70 hot wings everyday.... Mellow
FuzzNJ Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
dubleuhb wrote:
I do however think the first lady should put her politics aside and act as the first lady should. This one hasn't, she uses her position to vacation on every one's dime and spew her liberal diatribe whenever she gets a chance, NOT what a first lady should be doing.


lmao, women should be seen and not heard. Same crap was said about Hillary. This time there are some delicious racist insults added to the mix like gorilla, chewbacca and bigfoot. Same crap different day. Hell, just growing a garden made the right wing go nuts and that wasn't political.

So your concern is noted, then crumpled up and thrown away.
ZRX1200 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Chewbacca loves do as I say not as I do.

Its well documented that she is a hypocrite and has no class.
teedubbya Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
ZRX1200 wrote:

Its well documented that she is a hypocrite and has no class.



LMAO. Yes, I've even studied the data elements and it is a very conclusive study. It even has a name... the Chewbacca principal.

Never understood going after first ladies. my buddy painted the bottom of his toilet with barbara bush's face. I thought it was tasteless everytimne I shat on her.

classless. not that I exude class so carry on you classless bassards but don't try to convice anyone that it is anything but your own stupidity.
ZRX1200 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Someone has to feed fuzzy .......

teedubbya Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
True
ZRX1200 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
The chewbacca principle lead to the chewbacca defense that Johnny Chochoran made famous.

Good luck finding fault with that.
dpnewell Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
FuzzNJ wrote:
lmao, women should be seen and not heard. Same crap was said about Hillary. This time there are some delicious racist insults added to the mix like gorilla, chewbacca and bigfoot. Same crap different day. Hell, just growing a garden made the right wing go nuts and that wasn't political.

So your concern is noted, then crumpled up and thrown away.





FuzzNJ wrote:
A rant by Bill Hicks from the early 90's. He died in 94 from pancreatic cancer after a short stint as one of the best stand up comics of all time.





"Speaking of Satan, I was watching Rush Limbaugh the other day.



Doesn't Rush Limbaugh remind you of one of those gay guys who likes to lay in a tub while other men pee on him? Am I the only one?



Can't you see his fat body in a tub while Reagan, Quayle and Bush just stand around pissing on him? His little piggly wiggly ****** can't get hard,



'Uhh... uhh...I can't get hard. Reagan, pee in my mouth!'



He still can't get hard, so Barbara Bush comes in. She takes off her pearls, and undoes her girdle. Her wrinkled, flaccid labia unfurls half way to her knees, like some ball-less scrotum. Barbara walks over, squats over his face, and squeezes out a link into his mouth. Finally, his tiny ****** gets half-way hard.



'Oooh!' A little bubble forms on the end of his ******, with a little demon maggot inside. The demon maggot pops the bubble, and goes off to join a pro-life group somewhere."



Yeah. He called it the comedy of hate. ;)





Why does HYPOCRITE come to mind? Oh that’s right, Fuzz was just quoting a joke, told by who he feels is “one of the best stand up comics of all time”. Guess you can post the most horrendous, demeaning filth you want about someone, as long as it’s a “joke”. Right, Fuzzy?


FuzzNJ Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
How would those two posts make me a hypocrite?
wheelrite Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
She's Eva Braun ,Marie Antoinette and Weezy Jefferson all rolled into one .

I despise the Kunt...
pdxstogieman Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
She's Eva Braun ,Marie Antoinette and Weezy Jefferson all rolled into one .

I despise the Kunt...


Forum Rules & Conditions
Use of the forum is open to all CigarBid registered users. The Forum is provided as an opportunity for members to discuss cigars and related topics.

The basic rule for using the Forum is that you use good judgment and common sense in keeping your comments and messages reasonable. Some examples of unreasonable messages may include the use of profanity, advertising or commercial purposes, competing web sites, or disparaging an individual, a race or religion, a company, or website. In the event that certain Forum postings are questionable, the posting will be taken down, and offenders may have their privileges removed. This message area is monitored by our staff, who reserve the right to remove, edit or close a post or thread at any time. However, it is impossible to review every message, and while we will make every effort to remove objectionable material right away, by using the forum you acknowledge that all posts are the express opinions of the authors only. Therefore, in no way will CigarBid.com or its administrators or staff be held liable for any post. The IP address of all posts is recorded to assist in enforcing these terms and conditions.

By entering the forums you agree to be bound by these conditions
wheelrite Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
Forum Rules & Conditions
Use of the forum is open to all CigarBid registered users. The Forum is provided as an opportunity for members to discuss cigars and related topics.

The basic rule for using the Forum is that you use good judgment and common sense in keeping your comments and messages reasonable. Some examples of unreasonable messages may include the use of profanity, advertising or commercial purposes, competing web sites, or disparaging an individual, a race or religion, a company, or website. In the event that certain Forum postings are questionable, the posting will be taken down, and offenders may have their privileges removed. This message area is monitored by our staff, who reserve the right to remove, edit or close a post or thread at any time. However, it is impossible to review every message, and while we will make every effort to remove objectionable material right away, by using the forum you acknowledge that all posts are the express opinions of the authors only. Therefore, in no way will CigarBid.com or its administrators or staff be held liable for any post. The IP address of all posts is recorded to assist in enforcing these terms and conditions.

By entering the forums you agree to be bound by these conditions


Where did I violate any forum rules..
You may disagree with my opinion of the biotch ,so what ?
wheelrite Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Eva Anna Paula Hitler (née Braun[1][2]; 6 February 1912 – 30 April 1945) was the longtime companion of Adolf Hitler and, for less than 40 hours, his wife. Braun met Hitler in Munich, when she was 17 years old, while working as an assistant and model for his personal photographer and began seeing him often about two years later. She attempted suicide twice during their early relationship. By 1936, she was a part of his household at the Berghof near Berchtesgaden and by all accounts lived a materially luxurious and sheltered life throughout World War II. Braun kept up habits which met Hitler's disapproval, such as smoking, wearing makeup and nude sunbathing. Braun enjoyed photography and many of the surviving colour photographs and film of Hitler were taken by her. She was a key figure within Hitler's inner social circle, but did not attend public events with him until mid-1944, when her sister Gretl married Hermann Fegelein, the SS liaison officer on his staff.


Marie Antoinette ( /məˈriː æntwəˈnɛt/ or /æntwɑːˈnɛt/; French pronunciation: [maʁi ɑ̃twanɛt]; baptised Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna (or Maria Antonia Josephina Johanna[1]); 2 November 1755 – 16 October 1793) was an Archduchess of Austria and the Queen of France and of Navarre. She was the fifteenth and penultimate child of Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa and Holy Roman Emperor Francis I.

In April 1770, on the day of her marriage to Louis-Auguste, Dauphin of France, she subsequently became Dauphine of France. Marie Antoinette assumed the title of Queen of France and of Navarre when her husband, Louis XVI of France, ascended the throne upon the death of Louis XV in May 1774. After seven years of marriage, she gave birth to a daughter, Marie-Thérèse Charlotte, the first of four children.

Initially charmed by her personality and beauty, the French people generally came to dislike her, accusing "the Austrian" of being profligate and promiscuous,[2] and of harboring sympathies for France's enemies, particularly Austria, since Marie Antoinette was, after all, Austrian.[3]

At the height of the French Revolution, Louis XVI was deposed and the monarchy abolished on 10 August 1792; the royal family was subsequently imprisoned at the Temple Prison. Nine months after her husband's execution, Marie Antoinette was herself tried, convicted of treason, and executed by guillotine on 16 October 1793.


Weezy Jefferson lived an oppulent life on the coatails of her husband George,,,


You combine all three,you get Michelle, her giant hypocrit,lavish living,let them eat cake azz...


pdxstogieman Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
Where did I violate any forum rules..
You may disagree with my opinion of the biotch ,so what ?


If you can't figure it out, you're even denser than I thought, but I think you know exactly where you violated the forum rules. You act like some 13 year old who knows when they're over the line but keep smirking and denying it.

I don't really care what your opinion is on this subject, you might try and use adjectives that are simply the low class sludge genre of some of the earlier posters on this thread instead striving successfully to reach the bottom of the gutter in terms of epithets.
wheelrite Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
If you can't figure it out, you're even denser than I thought, but I think you know exactly where you violated the forum rules. You act like some 13 year old who knows when they're over the line but keep smirking and denying it.

I don't really care what your opinion is on this subject, you might try and use adjectives that are simply the low class sludge genre of some of the earlier posters on this thread instead striving successfully to reach the bottom of the gutter in terms of epithets.


You're a verbose bombastic turd..

what epithets ?



And believe it or not,
Nobody cares if you're offended,,,


whip
pdxstogieman Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
You're a verbose bombastic turd..

what epithets ?



And believe it or not,
Nobody cares if you're offended,,,


whip


You're pathetic.
wheelrite Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
You're pathetic.


Really ?

See,
You think people are impressed by your pseudo intellectual drivel,they aren't.

You impress none but yourself...

that's pathetic

Anxious
pdxstogieman Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
Really ?

See,
You think people are impressed by your pseudo intellectual drivel,they aren't.

You impress none but yourself...

that's pathetic

Anxious


You'd have a hard time living with yourself if you weren't so lacking in self awareness,
wheelrite Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
You'd have a hard time living with yourself if you weren't so lacking in self awareness,


Oh, now you're Cbid's Lefty Kreskin ?

Don't be so sure you have me figured out,,

Drool
pdxstogieman Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
Oh, now you're Cbid's Lefty Kreskin ?

Don't be so sure you have me figured out,,

Drool


Are you saying you DO have a hard time living with yourself?
wheelrite Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
Are you saying you DO have a hard time living with yourself?


Actually ,I'm a very happy person.
And most people love me...
pdxstogieman Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
wheelrite wrote:
Actually ,I'm a very happy person.
And most people love me...


If you say so.
wheelrite Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
pdxstogieman wrote:
If you say so.


ask any hot chick...
dubleuhb Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
FuzzNJ wrote:
lmao, women should be seen and not heard. Same crap was said about Hillary. This time there are some delicious racist insults added to the mix like gorilla, chewbacca and bigfoot. Same crap different day. Hell, just growing a garden made the right wing go nuts and that wasn't political.

So your concern is noted, then crumpled up and thrown away.

There you go, trying to read something into what I said that wasn't there.
The first lady is supposed to be an ambassador for the people not just another partisan hack. If you read the OP you would see the crap that is coming out of her rather large mouth is nothing but insults and distortions of the truth to say the least. Your attempt to lump me in with those that have used your so called racial insults is futile because it didn't happen. Never did I say she should shut her mouth though it wouldn't be such a bad thing now that YOU mentioned it. And yes I still stck with my original statement; classless biotch!
tailgater Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I thought this was a thread to point out the uh, attributes of the first "lady".

But it has become a name calling contest instead.
Let's get back on track.

My comments may be "sludge", or whatever else. But consider the target of my insults.
She is a dispicable person who admits to disliking this country. That may be fine for a hippie hanging down on Wall Street, but for a first lady to espouse this opinion is disturbing to say the least.
The fact that I call her out on it should not cause anyone to critique my comment, lest they also provide ample evidence that I am somehow incorrect in my assessment.

pdxstogieman Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
I thought this was a thread to point out the uh, attributes of the first "lady".

But it has become a name calling contest instead.
Let's get back on track.

My comments may be "sludge", or whatever else. But consider the target of my insults.
She is a dispicable person who admits to disliking this country. That may be fine for a hippie hanging down on Wall Street, but for a first lady to espouse this opinion is disturbing to say the least.
The fact that I call her out on it should not cause anyone to critique my comment, lest they also provide ample evidence that I am somehow incorrect in my assessment.



According to a column by a rightwing writer in a rightwing newspaper founded and owned for most of it's life by the Rev Sun Myung Moon and the Unification church. No bias, no spin on that story I'm sure.
pdxstogieman Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
I thought this was a thread to point out the uh, attributes of the first "lady".

But it has become a name calling contest instead.
Let's get back on track.

My comments may be "sludge", or whatever else. But consider the target of my insults.
She is a dispicable person who admits to disliking this country. That may be fine for a hippie hanging down on Wall Street, but for a first lady to espouse this opinion is disturbing to say the least.
The fact that I call her out on it should not cause anyone to critique my comment, lest they also provide ample evidence that I am somehow incorrect in my assessment.



There are no quotes from Michelle Obama at all cited by the author of that linked story where she says she dislikes this country. The only thing inflammatory is the mountains of spin put on the few actual quotes. He actually doesn't like Michelle Obama saying things that are critical of Obama's political opponents that he supports.
Your comments are still sludge, based on uncritical acceptance of an opinion piece that doesn't in any objective way support your contention of her being "despicable". Unless not agreeing with your point of view politically is all it takes to be "despicable".

I can't think of another past 1st lady regardless of party or point of view that has been subjected to the type of sludge you and your ilk are throwing at Michelle Obama. Now what would be the difference here that would warrant this kind of hate...?
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
She is the biggest hypocrite.



Think of Nancy Reagan doing a just say no commercial then taking 200 friends somewhere overseas to smoke crack.
DrafterX Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I bet her and Oprah could go thru about 300 hot wings if they tried..... Mellow
pdxstogieman Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
I thought this was a thread to point out the uh, attributes of the first "lady".

But it has become a name calling contest instead.
Let's get back on track.



ehhh....pointing out "attributes"...such as "biotch" and "K#nt" is clearly being disrupted by all this "name calling".

Irony.
pdxstogieman Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrafterX wrote:
I bet her and Oprah could go thru about 300 hot wings if they tried..... Mellow


From this kind of comment I can only conclude that your maturation process stalled at about 6th grade.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
ehhh....pointing out "attributes"...such as "biotch" and "K#nt" is clearly being disrupted by all this "name calling".

Irony.



Don't worry Rick will be along to do all of that for you.

Just put Palin in the title of a thread and you will get all the irony you desire!
DrafterX Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
pdxstogieman wrote:
From this kind of comment I can only conclude that your maturation process stalled at about 6th grade.




Shame on you Shame on you not true..... I'm much taller than I was back then....
teedubbya Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
pdxstogieman wrote:
I bet her and Oprah could go thru about 300 hot wings if they tried.....


.


only if they could resist filling up on the watermellon first.
pdxstogieman Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrafterX wrote:
Shame on you Shame on you not true..... I'm much taller than I was back then....


Ok, I'll be more specific. Mental maturation.
DrafterX Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Laugh
teedubbya Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Don't worry Rick will be along to do all of that for you.

Just put Palin in the title of a thread and you will get all the irony you desire!

Palin likes chicken and watermellon?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
HANDS ABOVE THE COVERS OUTRAGE!!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages1234>