America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by Brewha. 184 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
The very angry first lady Michelle Obama
teedubbya Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
actually watermellon is healthy so it's cool
jetblasted Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I'm reminded of this, when I think of her ...

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/29981/original.jpg
DrMaddVibe Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
jetblasted wrote:
I'm reminded of this, when I think of her ...

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/29981/original.jpg



Think


Sure it's not....


http://cheezburger.com/reddbaron/lolz/View/1045124352
pdxstogieman Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Don't worry Rick will be along to do all of that for you.

Just put Palin in the title of a thread and you will get all the irony you desire!


If Rick called Palin "biotch, K@nt, and the like that's low class sludge too. The gutter is bi-partisan for those who choose to reside there. Poor attempt at rationalization.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
If Rick called Palin "biotch, K@nt, and the like that's low class sludge too. The gutter is bi-partisan for those who choose to reside there. Poor attempt at rationalization.



I'm not trying to rationalize anything. Just stating facts.

Do your own leg work.

tailgater Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
I can't think of another past 1st lady regardless of party or point of view that has been subjected to the type of sludge you and your ilk are throwing at Michelle Obama. Now what would be the difference here that would warrant this kind of hate...?



I'd like YOU to answer that question.
I'd hate to jump to conclusions on how your thought process works.
pdxstogieman Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
I'd like YOU to answer that question.
I'd hate to jump to conclusions on how your thought process works.


I asked 1st. what's your answer. I'd hate to jump to conclusions about whether your thought process works at all.
tailgater Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
ehhh....pointing out "attributes"...such as "biotch" and "K#nt" is clearly being disrupted by all this "name calling".

Irony.



I don't think you understand the concept of "irony".

The affections layed on the first "lady" was the subject of the thread.
The name calling was direct assault based on opposing viewpoints.

pdxstogieman Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I'm not trying to rationalize anything. Just stating facts.

Do your own leg work.



Sludge is sludge.

No legwork to be done chief.
tailgater Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
I asked 1st. what's your answer. I'd hate to jump to conclusions about whether your thought process works at all.


The only difference as far as I'm concerned is that Michelle has shown time and again that she is an anti-American pig.

I have a feeling, however, that you were going for something different.
Something that perhaps you're too afraid to state clearly.
But again, I shan't put words into your mouth (or onto your keyboard, shoudl I say?).

HockeyDad Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,169
Laura Bush never received this sort of awful treatment.

She killed a man a long time ago and once you kill somebody, people give you respect. Perhaps Michelle Obama just needs to kill somebody and then you will all settle down.
DrafterX Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
HockeyDad wrote:
Laura Bush never received this sort of awful treatment.

She killed a man a long time ago and once you kill somebody, people give you respect. Perhaps Michelle Obama just needs to kill somebody and then you will all settle down.




I heard she ate a kid once.... Mellow
pdxstogieman Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:

The affections layed on the first "lady" was the subject of the thread.
The name calling was direct assault based on opposing viewpoints.



Your original comment is low class sludge.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
Your original comment is low class sludge.



The day I see you playing class monitor on the lefties here I'll break into my 1st Communion money and buy some cigars.
ZRX1200 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Laura Bush has more street cred than Cheebacca...



Hate on that Al Sharpton.
pdxstogieman Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
The day I see you playing class monitor on the lefties here I'll break into my 1st Communion money and buy some cigars.


Just post a few more gorilla pics.
tailgater Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
Your original comment is low class sludge.


Yup. I don't think I disputed that.

But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?
Or worse than the subtle cry of racism that you're too coward to confirm?

DrMaddVibe Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
tailgater wrote:
Yup. I don't think I disputed that.

But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?
Or worse than the subtle cry of racism that you're too coward to confirm?




for the 1st time in my CBid life I'm proud of this forum.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
Just post a few more gorilla pics.



looking for a mate?
pdxstogieman Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
The only difference as far as I'm concerned is that Michelle has shown time and again that she is an anti-American pig.

I have a feeling, however, that you were going for something different.
Something that perhaps you're too afraid to state clearly.
But again, I shan't put words into your mouth (or onto your keyboard, shoudl I say?).



I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.




MikeyRavioli Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2005
Posts: 2,105
Name calling aside - how do you justify that she lives the life and solicits donations from the very element of America that her husband rails against?
tailgater Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.






What a bullsh*t reply.

You meant because she's black.

Hillary "expressed her own viewpoints" and we slammed her for 8+ years, but you seem to think our vitriol towards Michelle is somehow worse.
Because she's black.

You're the worst kind of racist.
You see racism where it doesn't exist.

Are there racists in America? Certainly.
Does racisim still exist? Absolutely.

But to use that logic to state "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".

That response is exponentially more "low class" than all the bad things I stated about Mrs O.
Low class, idiotic, misguided, and flat out incorrect.

I feel sorry for you.
pdxstogieman Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
MikeyRavioli wrote:
Name calling aside - how do you justify that she lives the life and solicits donations from the very element of America that her husband rails against?


I don't. President Obama is doing the same thing and his wife is acting similarly in a support role. If you look at another thread I started titled, "Obama is a Republican in sheeps clothing", you'll see that I'm highlighting the fact that Obama has solicited record campaign contributions from the same wall street influence seekers that he's busy excoriating to his voter base and he's also largely been extending Bush policies through his administration to date.

pdxstogieman Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
What a bullsh*t reply.

You meant because she's black.

Hillary "expressed her own viewpoints" and we slammed her for 8+ years, but you seem to think our vitriol towards Michelle is somehow worse.
Because she's black.

You're the worst kind of racist.
You see racism where it doesn't exist.

Are there racists in America? Certainly.
Does racisim still exist? Absolutely.

But to use that logic to state "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".

That response is exponentially more "low class" than all the bad things I stated about Mrs O.
Low class, idiotic, misguided, and flat out incorrect.

I feel sorry for you.


Do you make up quotes often? "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".
Please go back and re-read my post. Nowhere in that post do I make that statement, although you put it in quotes and attribute it to me. That makes you a liar.

Now if you actually look at what I DID post and accurately quote it, your statement that my response is lower class than your spewing of pejoratives is laughable.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.












RACE CARD



PLAYA!
pdxstogieman Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
RACE CARD



PLAYA!



OH MY GOD! 48 point bold red font!!!!!! Noooo!! Not that!!!! My worst fear!
tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
Do you make up quotes often? "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".
Please go back and re-read my post. Nowhere in that post do I make that statement, although you put it in quotes and attribute it to me. That makes you a liar.

Now if you actually look at what I DID post and accurately quote it, your statement that my response is lower class than your spewing of pejoratives is laughable.


Make up quotes?

If I were an artist, I'd draw it so you could better understand.
The quotes were used to identify your sentiment. I now understand that you're lost, so I'll be more clear:

When you say (and I DO quote):
"I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society..."
It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America.

To your credit, you then add:
"I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that..."

But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint.

You then have a moment of clarity, where you finally admit your deepest little secret.
"..but I have no hesitation to say that I think it (RACE) factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.."

But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards.

You can laugh all you want, but the truth is that you see race first, and all other reasons as a distant second. That makes you racially motivated.
And that makes you a racist. By the pure definition, as opposed to opinion.

I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them.

This is why I feel sorry for you.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
OH MY GOD! 48 point bold red font!!!!!! Noooo!! Not that!!!! My worst fear!




OH MY GOD



A REPLY



POST




NOOOOO!!!




NOT THAT!!!!!





ANOTHER



POST




THAT



DOESN'T




MEAN CRAP




BECAUSE IT




DEFIES




COMMON




SENSE!!!!
pdxstogieman Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
tailgater wrote:
Make up quotes?

If I were an artist, I'd draw it so you could better understand.
The quotes were used to identify your sentiment. I now understand that you're lost, so I'll be more clear:

When you say (and I DO quote):
"I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society..."
It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America.

To your credit, you then add:
"I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that..."

But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint.

You then have a moment of clarity, where you finally admit your deepest little secret.
"..but I have no hesitation to say that I think it (RACE) factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.."

But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards.

You can laugh all you want, but the truth is that you see race first, and all other reasons as a distant second. That makes you racially motivated.
And that makes you a racist. By the pure definition, as opposed to opinion.

I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them.

This is why I feel sorry for you.


As Tye said to Judge Smails, "Don't sell yourself short. You're a really great slouch", or in this case, artist. And I'd have to say like an El Greco, your paintings are distorted.

You make the assertion, "It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America". That's not obvious or in any way something that could be construed by a reasonable person from what I actually said. What would actually be correct is that I attribute to some degree SOME of the negative things said about a black person in America to racism. For example, I think OJ Simpson is a murderer and pretty vile. I don't consider vast majority of negative statements about him to have any underlying basis in racism.

You go on to say, "But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards". That may be what you clearly take away as an implication of my statement, but that's not the case. I'm saying exactly what the words say. Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism. Are you saying that there is no racism at play either in American society or on the cbid message boards at all? Like Lake Woebegone, the cbid message board is some kind of oasis of perfection where all the children are above average.

And then add this nugget, "But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint". I posed the question it didn't expose anything. After you replied, I responded with my thoughts on the subject, and cited some non-racial factors that motivated strong negative emotions by some as well as race as one contributing factor in the reactions of some to one degree or another. If you consider that an "ugly viewpoint" then so be it. It's not an ugly viewpoint. It's a reality. It's not "my deepest, darkest little secret". If you don't think it comes into play at all, ever, by anybody, and that cbid is immune to it then I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.

As to your misguided and incorrect summation:
=================
"I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them".
===================
It would be awesome if you could actually read minds as you purport to do. So I've "decided to attack all injustices for them" because I have so little regard for black people? So in your mind responding to one thread on cbid is deciding to "attack all injustices"? By your reasoning, If someone sees an injustice that doesn't affect them, and they don't condone that injustice or they support someone or the group affected by the injustice then they're showing disregard for that person or group? So by that logic a person in Nazi germany hiding Jews from the authorities would be an anti-semite because they would be showing a disregard for their ability to stand up for themselves.

By your logic racism is a positive character building tool.
MikeyRavioli Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2005
Posts: 2,105
Interesting ethics conversation emerging here.

If its racist for one person to make hateful comments based soley on the color of some ones skin then is it not equally racist to for a second person to feel the need to defend that person based soley on skin color?

My guess is most of the people attacking Michele Obama's duplicity would atttack her regardless of color. I am not sure that her defenders would be so quick to come to her aid if she was white.

Hillary Clinton got ragged her for years. Palin gets shredded even though she holds no office.

Its racist to bomb on Michele becuase she's black. Its not racist if you bomb on her because you hate what she stands for and she happens to be black.
DrafterX Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
MikeyRavioli wrote:
Interesting ethics conversation emerging here.

If its racist for one person to make hateful comments based soley on the color of some ones skin then is it not equally racist to for a second person to feel the need to defend that person based soley on skin color?

My guess is most of the people attacking Michele Obama's duplicity would atttack her regardless of color. I am not sure that her defenders would be so quick to come to her aid if she was white.

Hillary Clinton got ragged her for years. Palin gets shredded even though she holds no office.

Its racist to bomb on Michele becuase she's black. Its not racist if you bomb on her because you hate what she stands for and she happens to be black.




must be that damn white guilt thing again..... Not talking
DrMaddVibe Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism.



You're an idiot.
pdxstogieman Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
Would be interesting to see all the black people that frequent this board weigh in on this topic.
pdxstogieman Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You're an idiot.


You have a nice day too. What was I thinking, saying that cbid message boards reflect the spectrum of attitudes present in society in general?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
Would be interesting to see all the black people that frequent this board weigh in on this topic.



I firmly believe they'd see right past the whole color issue that you want to wrap yourself around and get down to the meat of what she is and how she presents herself.

She's a disgrace regardless if she's stripped, purple, polka-dotted or any other spectrum of the rainbow but you won't call her out on her behaviors because you're the same way. You defend this poor choice with your hinted at racism like the guy that yells "FIRE!" in a movie theater is covered by Free Speech. It doesn't work there either!

Now you're on your knees meely-mouthing about how black people feel about her? They hate her too!

She's talked down to us and acted more like Marie Antoinette with her "Let them eat cake" since becoming First Lady. Have you been on a real vacation since Obama has been President? Not that fake ass Disney World crap. I'm talking about an African Safari or staying on Martha's Vineyard renting a house for 50K a week kind of vacation? No, you haven't. While the American people wanted Hope and Change he's busy taking "Date Night" and every other kind of vacation or golf outing. He doesn't care and neither does she. Birds of a feather carpetbagging their way through a failed administration on every level while you want to make it a race issue.


You REALLY are an idiot.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
You have a nice day too. What was I thinking, saying that cbid message boards reflect the spectrum of attitudes present in society in general?



You're a really great slouchFrying pan
MikeyRavioli Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2005
Posts: 2,105
Every time Bush took a vacation, went to Camp David, or played a round of golf it was reported in every news outlet. There were sites that had running totals. Lefty posters here created a new thread every time.

The Obama family has taken waaaaay more vacation time then Bush did. Obama plays waaaay more golf. But you don't see it given the same attention in the media.
pdxstogieman Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You're a really great slouchFrying pan


Quit stealing my lines.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
pdxstogieman wrote:
Quit stealing my lines.



Not your line.

Stop pretending you're Brian Doyle-Murray or Harold Ramis. You're not. You're not that good at humor. Matter of fact you're not good at anything!
DrafterX Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I heard God hates slouches.... Mellow
FuzzNJ Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
jetblasted wrote:
I'm reminded of this, when I think of her ...

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/29981/original.jpg


You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.
DrafterX Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
FuzzNJ wrote:
You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.



they must have been trying to make fun of her weight to then..... Mellow
FuzzNJ Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:


But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?




um, yes.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
FuzzNJ wrote:
You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.



I have no response to that.
FuzzNJ Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I firmly believe they'd see right past the whole color issue that you want to wrap yourself around and get down to the meat of what she is and how she presents herself.


lol.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

She's talked down to us and acted more like Marie Antoinette with her "Let them eat cake" since becoming First Lady. Have you been on a real vacation since Obama has been President? Not that fake ass Disney World crap. I'm talking about an African Safari or staying on Martha's Vineyard renting a house for 50K a week kind of vacation? No, you haven't. While the American people wanted Hope and Change he's busy taking "Date Night" and every other kind of vacation or golf outing. He doesn't care and neither does she. Birds of a feather carpetbagging their way through a failed administration on every level while you want to make it a race issue.


My aren't you jealous of the wife of the most powerful man on the planet. Go get a job and become really successful and you too can live well.
FuzzNJ Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
MikeyRavioli wrote:


The Obama family has taken waaaaay more vacation time then Bush did.


Dude, where the f are you getting this from? Totally untrue. WTF?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,528
FuzzNJ wrote:
lol.



My aren't you jealous of the wife of the most powerful man on the planet. Go get a job and become really successful and you too can live well.



Yeah...real laughfest.

You want to tear down Wall Street from the confines of your sofa but won't recognize that as America is in the midst of a depression the Kenyan King and Co. are busy racking up bills at taxpayer's expense.

Eat your own gruel.
FuzzNJ Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Yeah...real laughfest.

You want to tear down Wall Street from the confines of your sofa but won't recognize that as America is in the midst of a depression the Kenyan King and Co. are busy racking up bills at taxpayer's expense.

Eat your own gruel.


Such jealousy. Blame yourself if you can't afford nice vacations. They pay for all their own stuff except for transportation and security, that comes with the job for Democratic and Republican presidents.
tailgater Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
pdxstogieman wrote:
As Tye said to Judge Smails, "Don't sell yourself short. You're a really great slouch", or in this case, artist. And I'd have to say like an El Greco, your paintings are distorted.

You make the assertion, "It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America". That's not obvious or in any way something that could be construed by a reasonable person from what I actually said. What would actually be correct is that I attribute to some degree SOME of the negative things said about a black person in America to racism. For example, I think OJ Simpson is a murderer and pretty vile. I don't consider vast majority of negative statements about him to have any underlying basis in racism.

You go on to say, "But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards". That may be what you clearly take away as an implication of my statement, but that's not the case. I'm saying exactly what the words say. Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism. Are you saying that there is no racism at play either in American society or on the cbid message boards at all? Like Lake Woebegone, the cbid message board is some kind of oasis of perfection where all the children are above average.

And then add this nugget, "But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint". I posed the question it didn't expose anything. After you replied, I responded with my thoughts on the subject, and cited some non-racial factors that motivated strong negative emotions by some as well as race as one contributing factor in the reactions of some to one degree or another. If you consider that an "ugly viewpoint" then so be it. It's not an ugly viewpoint. It's a reality. It's not "my deepest, darkest little secret". If you don't think it comes into play at all, ever, by anybody, and that cbid is immune to it then I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.

As to your misguided and incorrect summation:
=================
"I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them".
===================
It would be awesome if you could actually read minds as you purport to do. So I've "decided to attack all injustices for them" because I have so little regard for black people? So in your mind responding to one thread on cbid is deciding to "attack all injustices"? By your reasoning, If someone sees an injustice that doesn't affect them, and they don't condone that injustice or they support someone or the group affected by the injustice then they're showing disregard for that person or group? So by that logic a person in Nazi germany hiding Jews from the authorities would be an anti-semite because they would be showing a disregard for their ability to stand up for themselves.

By your logic racism is a positive character building tool.


Yawn.
To keep it simple, I'll address your last pathetic attempt to save face.
I say "attack all injustices" as it relates to this thread. I don't suggest that you extend this charity to your everyday life. You don't have the passion for that.

Likewise, my comments are based on this thread. On some other thread I may agree with you and we'll be singing kumbaya and smoking cigars.
But on this thread, where you tried to be subtle about your racist viewpoints, and it back fired, you are officially pwned.
I do feel sorry for you because you did introduce race when it was not even on the radar. It's a cheap street performers trick, a slight of hand so to speak, that the liberal left use all too often.

I say "bravo" when I'm being sarcastic.
What I mean is "pathetic".
And to steal your words: Low Class.
No quotation marks required.

pdxstogieman Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Not your line.

Stop pretending you're Brian Doyle-Murray or Harold Ramis. You're not. You're not that good at humor. Matter of fact you're not good at anything!


In the context of this thread I used it first, with due attribution.

You're an idiot.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>