teedubbya wrote:LOL
Yet our conversation started with this
You are applying that logic this time (against obama.....read...all you need to know about romney is he is not Obama) but not when it is your bucket of kool aid in the WH.
you are something else. I parroted you (purposely) and you can't see it.
Dude, I am not missing what you are trying to say...the difference is that I CAN make the case for Romney over Obama. If I need to I will, and it's not even close. Calling people who voted for Bush in 2004 morons is just an emotional outburst unless you can tell us why Kerry was the clearly better choice over Bush.
As a conservative I don't defend Bush across the board. But obviously you have a dislike for Bush personally apparently when you say he ran the economy into the ground. The economy was good for most of his term after the recession he interited ended --we had 4.4% unemployment as late as 2007-- and the cause of the downturn was not caused primarily by his policies but a collapse of the housing bubble (a whole other complicated topic) and the bad bets Wall St. had placed. Could there have been more regulation? Yes. Did Bush overturn lots of Clinton regs? No.
And the whole war on false pretenses thing... So you are saying they falsified intelligence and bamboozled all the congressmen, senators and allies? Good luck proving that charge. And to what end would he do that anyway?
So, so much for your charge that I am drinking Kool-Aid. Bush spent way too much, and because of that he gave an opening for Democrats to win the elections and turn this country far to the left...a sad legacy.