America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by ZRX1200. 202 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
PROOF ! Global Warming is a Hoax
DrafterX Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
I thought they were using tide turbines up there somewhere... or did they decide it would kill a couple fish and pull the plug..??
tailgater Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
DrafterX wrote:
I thought they were using tide turbines up there somewhere... or did they decide it would kill a couple fish and pull the plug..??


I read something about that.
I think it's at a small, experimental level. Probably at the lower end of the canal where the tides are fierce (near Woods Hole*).








*note: Right now, TW is giggling at the use of the words "wood" and "hole" in the same sentence.



Abrignac Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,354
Quote:
5. If it were a "fact" or even the "accepted theory" then there would be no need for Al Gore and his minions to use blatant lies to make their point.


My point exactly. It's about the money. I've said it before. Latch on to a hot button issue, proclaim yourself the king of the hill, sell newletters and earn an income.

BTW IGOR, oops I mean Al Gore, how big is your PERSONAL fossil footprint?

Just sayin.......
DrafterX Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
how much is a carbon credit anyway..?? who decides how many I need..?? Huh
Roaster Dude Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
victor809 wrote:
And cue the meatballs using Al Gore's actions as "proof" that Global Warming doesn't exist.

By that logic, priests screwing young boys is proof god doesn't exist.

Victor you shouldn't use your alter boy experiences to make your point in this case... just saying
teedubbya Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Pull my finger
victor809 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Roaster Dude wrote:
Victor you shouldn't use your alter boy experiences to make your point in this case... just saying


Altar boy experiences?
Hell I was molested by a priest this morning. Therefore there isn't a god.
DrafterX Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
victor809 wrote:
Hell I was molested by a priest this morning.



you can't say molested if it was consensual.... Shame on you Shame on you

were you wearing a habit..?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Nunya bness
teedubbya Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I find god every time I self pleasure
tailgater Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Altar boy experiences?
Hell I was molested by a priest this morning. Therefore there isn't a god.


I didn't realize that there was a position in rugby called a priest.
Huh. Learn something new everyday.

victor809 Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
No.... but we have Hookers, Locks and Props....
tailgater Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
No.... but we have Hookers, Locks and Props....


You're a hooker? I thought I was just doing great with you!

(spoken with an English drunken slur)

DadZilla3 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Reality check....there is irrefutable evidence that 'climate change' has been happening on planet Earth for millions of years. What we haven't had until recently though was politicians who tried to turn the Earth's natural and inevitable climatic cycles into a social, political, and economic global power grab.

Global warming, global cooling, global climate change. It's all been happening since way before we came along and invented plastic milk jugs and Cadillac Escalades.
tailgater Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
DadZilla3 wrote:
Reality check....there is irrefutable evidence that 'climate change' has been happening on planet Earth for millions of years. What we haven't had until recently though was politicians who tried to turn the Earth's natural and inevitable climatic cycles into a social, political, and economic global power grab.

Global warming, global cooling, global climate change. It's all been happening since way before we came along and invented plastic milk jugs and Cadillac Escalades.


Don't go dissin' on the plastic milk jugs.

Besides, today most are using saline bags in place of silicone...
DadZilla3 Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
tailgater wrote:
Don't go dissin' on the plastic milk jugs.

Besides, today most are using saline bags in place of silicone...


Science!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fI8834iCgo
victor809 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
You're a hooker? I thought I was just doing great with you!

(spoken with an English drunken slur)



Hell.... I'm 6'1+ and 220... I'm a little to tall and heavy to be a hooker.

Hookers get nicknames like "Samwise" and "Princess Mei Ling"
victor809 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
And Props get nicknames like: "Fatass", "Fattest Prop Ever", "Holy **** look how fat that guy is"... "I really hope he doesn't catch me" and "At least it's soft and pillowy when you tackle him"
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think we have the ability to destroy the earth quickly or slowly and the politics of it are bizarre.
DrafterX Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
I heard we have an earthquake machine.... Mellow
ZRX1200 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,651
^ your never ending knowledge of alternative lifestyle matters is disturbingly impressive.
DrafterX Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
Mellow
tailgater Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Hell.... I'm 6'1+ and 220... I'm a little to tall and heavy to be a hooker.

Hookers get nicknames like "Samwise" and "Princess Mei Ling"


My "Arthur" reference falling on deaf ears, I see.

You must have hated that moose...
DrafterX Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
didn't they remake that movie recently..?? I think I saw something but wasn't interested.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
My "Arthur" reference falling on deaf ears, I see.

You must have hated that moose...


Ahhh... I was wondering what you were referencing. I think I saw that movie a very long time ago. Those brain cells are long dead.
FuzzNJ Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrafterX wrote:
didn't they remake that movie recently..?? I think I saw something but wasn't interested.... Mellow


Ya, was recently on HBO or something. Caught like 3 minutes. Horrible, just awful.
ZRX1200 Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,651
Sorry Drafter that was for Victor.
Roaster Dude Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
DadZilla3 wrote:
Reality check....there is irrefutable evidence that 'climate change' has been happening on planet Earth for millions of years. What we haven't had until recently though was politicians who tried to turn the Earth's natural and inevitable climatic cycles into a social, political, and economic global power grab.

Global warming, global cooling, global climate change. It's all been happening since way before we came along and invented plastic milk jugs and Cadillac Escalades.


No doubt...
There was an ice age then the earth warmed up and the ice melted, that is global warming, that is climate change. Except it happened many times in the past, what caused it then?

The same thing that is causing it now!! ITS THE SUN!!
The sun has substantially increased in activity over the last millennia.
In recent history the satellites that measure sun activity had to be recalibrated because they were pegged and couldn't measure that high.
It is fact that the sun causes the earth to warm and cool based on its output.
The earth is bombarded with energy from the sun so are all the other planets in our solar system.
All of the planets in our solar system have become measurably brighter.
The ice caps on mars show signs of melting. All of the planets are warming up, all of them are not just earth.

There are very accurate and detailed ancient maps of Antarctica showing the shape of the land mass under the ice.
We only in recent history knew this from using ground penetrating sonar type equipment.
How can this be? Because there was no ice on Antarctica in the very recent past.
Look at all of history and think for yourself and stop for a moment and ask...
Who gains from from the agenda that is being pushed right now?
FuzzNJ Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Thanks professor Roaster dude.

"Just think for yourself a moment"?

This is how you determine whether or not you think something you don't study, nor understand, is correct or not? You have looked at all of history?

Bunch of freakin' idiots running around thinking they know everything because they keep being told they are the 'salt of the earth' in the 'greatest country on the planet' and you believe you are.

I've said here for years that I am barely smart enough to realize I'm stupid. That is to say that I realize I don't know sh*t, but I know enough to know that there is WAY too much I don't know. On global warming, I'm going to side with the scientists who do this everyday, all day, for their entire life. That seems more reasonable to me than to listen to conservative senators or media personalities, but that's just me.

On this board we have experts on what is constitutional and what is not, what science is wrong and why, how to run the economy, It's amazing!
Roaster Dude Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
victor809 wrote:
And cue the meatballs using Al Gore's actions as "proof" that Global Warming doesn't exist

That is an inference I didn't say that was proof of anything...
Though it is good evidence that Al "The Oil Barron" Gore is whoring himself out for his gods... "Power, Money and Greed" He is involved in a money making scheme on a grand scale and all of us are the suckers in the deal.

riverdog Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 2,600
I can get my mind around the ice comes/ice goes thing, and changes in solar activity...... but I cannot for the life of me fathom the argument that 7 plus billion of us are NOT capable of affecting this planets weather in any number of ways... and I've only been trying to keep track of things for 60 years or so............ crazy old man........ Hey, get the hell off my lawn!fog
DrafterX Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
Think
well, if there's too many people on the earth it seems like an easy fix.... Mellow
Roaster Dude Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
FuzzNJ wrote:
Thanks professor Roaster dude.
"Just think for yourself a moment"?
This is how you determine whether or not you think something you don't study, nor understand, is correct or not? You have looked at all of history?
Bunch of freakin' idiots running around thinking they know everything because they keep being told they are the 'salt of the earth' in the 'greatest country on the planet' and you believe you are.
I've said here for years that I am barely smart enough to realize I'm stupid. That is to say that I realize I don't know sh*t, but I know enough to know that there is WAY too much I don't know. On global warming, I'm going to side with the scientists who do this everyday, all day, for their entire life. That seems more reasonable to me than to listen to conservative senators or media personalities, but that's just me.
On this board we have experts on what is constitutional and what is not, what science is wrong and why, how to run the economy, It's amazing!


How would you know any of that about me?

I don't give credence to any of the people you list. I don't give a shyt what politicians have to say. They all suck as far as I am concerned. They are the problem.

I have been interested in this subject for 25 or more years.
I don't have to be any of the things you cite to learn and understand about something I am interested in.
You clearly don't understand that most studies prove what the person paying wants to hear.

Re-read what you just said. I could say the same things to you about your argument.

Salty Dog
Roaster Dude Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
Oh... that's Professor Salty Dog to you
victor809 Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
riverdog wrote:
I can get my mind around the ice comes/ice goes thing, and changes in solar activity...... but I cannot for the life of me fathom the argument that 7 plus billion of us are NOT capable of affecting this planets weather in any number of ways... and I've only been trying to keep track of things for 60 years or so............ crazy old man........ Hey, get the hell off my lawn!fog


That's always been my point.

There are multiple factors, each potentially obscuring the other, so who knows what the actual impact will be. But to think that our large population and significant changes to the environment is not going to have any impact whatsoever is idiotic.

Now, I personally have no children and I don't like anyone else's ugly sticky children. So as far as I'm concerned as long as the planet remains reasonably habitable for the next 50 years, that's fine. It can go and turn into an uninhabitable rock after I die for all I care. However, people who have children they actually like should be exhibiting a bit more of a risk-averse strategy when assessing the impact our population has on the planet.
FuzzNJ Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Roaster Dude wrote:
How would you know any of that about me?


What? That you don't get science? I think it's pretty f*cking obvious.

Roaster Dude wrote:
I don't give credence to any of the people you list. I don't give a shyt what politicians have to say. They all suck as far as I am concerned. They are the problem.


I listed no one.

Roaster Dude wrote:
I have been interested in this subject for 25 or more years.


I've been interested in a lot of things for 40+ years that I wouldn't feel comfortable teaching a class or testifying under oath about.

Roaster Dude wrote:
I don't have to be any of the things you cite to learn and understand about something I am interested in.


If your 'understanding' is opposite of what everyone who does this for a living is, then I would think you would need to. Let's say you have a brand new way of performing heart surgery that no one has every thought of before and every heart surgeon thinks you are wrong. Think anyone should listen to you because you say "I've been interested in heart surgery for 25 years." I think not.

Roaster Dude wrote:
You clearly don't understand that most studies prove what the person paying wants to hear.


And there it is. Yes, that can be true. You are describing what is called junk science. The sh*t that industries pay for to try to keep selling poisen or sh*t or screw someone. To then extrapolate that out and say all science is not bs because of that is pathetic and sad.

Roaster Dude wrote:
Re-read what you just said. I could say the same things to you about your argument.

Salty Dog


And how is that exactly?
hoyodude Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 07-17-2000
Posts: 4,395
I think the political discourse on this forum is a great example of "internet savvy" experts explaining how everything is a hoax. Keep reading and believing, children - isn't it fun to have people who support your ideas? YAY! Meanwhile, an overpopulated and vigorously adamant "civilization" slips down the tubes...the rest of the galaxy really doesn't give a s**t. I just hope you all don't care about your grandchildren because that's who is being saddled with this garbage...Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall
GIBrett Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2012
Posts: 282
FuzzNJ wrote:
Thanks professor Roaster dude.

"Just think for yourself a moment"?

This is how you determine whether or not you think something you don't study, nor understand, is correct or not? You have looked at all of history?

Bunch of freakin' idiots running around thinking they know everything because they keep being told they are the 'salt of the earth' in the 'greatest country on the planet' and you believe you are.

I've said here for years that I am barely smart enough to realize I'm stupid. That is to say that I realize I don't know sh*t, but I know enough to know that there is WAY too much I don't know. On global warming, I'm going to side with the scientists who do this everyday, all day, for their entire life. That seems more reasonable to me than to listen to conservative senators or media personalities, but that's just me.

On this board we have experts on what is constitutional and what is not, what science is wrong and why, how to run the economy, It's amazing!


That's fine and I'm going to side with the scientists that do this every day and think it's total crap...
GIBrett Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2012
Posts: 282
hoyodude wrote:
I think the political discourse on this forum is a great example of "internet savvy" experts explaining how everything is a hoax. Keep reading and believing, children - isn't it fun to have people who support your ideas? YAY! Meanwhile, an overpopulated and vigorously adamant "civilization" slips down the tubes...the rest of the galaxy really doesn't give a s**t. I just hope you all don't care about your grandchildren because that's who is being saddled with this garbage...Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall


I agree with you completely. I think we are over populating and I think we are leaving all kinds of crap for the next generations to deal with. I just don't think it's global warming. I think it's debt we may never turn around and a government that is going to rule their lives.
FuzzNJ Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
GIBrett wrote:
That's fine and I'm going to side with the scientists that do this every day and think it's total crap...


There aren't any of those. Over 98% of all scientists who work in the field disagree with you and where they disagree with their colleagues is on issues like what can be done, when it should be done, if it even could be done and what the effects will be.



Scientific Consensus on Global Warming

Scientific societies and scientists have released statements and studies showing the growing consensus on climate change science. A common objection to taking action to reduce our heat-trapping emissions has been uncertainty within the scientific community on whether or not global warming is happening and if it is caused by humans. However, there is now an overwhelming scientific consensus that global warming is indeed happening and humans are contributing to it. Below are links to documents and statements attesting to this consensus.

Scientific Societies

Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations

"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (October, 2009)

American Meteorological Society: Climate Change: An Information Statement of the American Meteorological Society

"Indeed, strong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change." (February 2007)

American Physical Society: Statement on Climate Change

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (November 2007)

American Geophysical Union: Human Impacts on Climate

"The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system—including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons—are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century." (Adopted December 2003, Revised and Reaffirmed December 2007)

American Association for the Advancement of Science: AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (December 2006)

Geological Society of America: Global Climate Change

"The Geological Society of America (GSA) supports the scientific conclusions that Earth’s climate is changing; the climate changes are due in part to human activities; and the probable consequences of the climate changes will be significant and blind to geopolitical boundaries." (October 2006)

American Chemical Society: Statement on Global Climate Change

"There is now general agreement among scientific experts that the recent warming trend is real (and particularly strong within the past 20 years), that most of the observed warming is likely due to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and that climate change could have serious adverse effects by the end of this century." (July 2004)

National Science Academies

U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Understanding and Responding to Climate Change (pdf)

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)

International academies: Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change (pdf)

"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring." (2005, 11 national academies of science)

International academies: The Science of Climate Change

"Despite increasing consensus on the science underpinning predictions of global climate change, doubts have been expressed recently about the need to mitigate the risks posed by global climate change. We do not consider such doubts justified." (2001, 16 national academies of science)

Research

National Research Council of the National Academies, America’s Climate Choices

"Most of the recent warming can be attributed to fossil fuel burning and other human activities that release carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere." America's Climate Choices, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, 2010

U.S. Climate Change Research Program, Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (2009)

"Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases."

Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change, Peter T. Doran and Maggie Kendall Zimmerman

"It seems that the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes."

Doran surveyed 10,257 Earth scientists. Thirty percent responded to the survey which asked: 1. When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant? and 2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?

Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change, Naomi Oreskes

"Oreskes analyzed 928 abstracts published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and listed in the ISI database with the keywords 'climate change.'... Of all the papers, 75 percent either explicitly or implicitly accepted the consensus view that global warming is happening and humans are contributing to it; 25 percent dealt with methods or ancient climates, taking no position on current anthropogenic [human-caused] climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position." 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, IPCC, 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level”

“Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”

IPCC defines "very likely" as greater than 90% probability of occurrence.

Sign-on Statements

The Importance of Science in Addressing Climate Change: Scientists’ letter to the U.S. Congress. Statement signed by 18 scientists.
"We want to assure you that the science is strong and that there is nothing abstract about the risks facing our Nation." (2011)

Climate Change and the Integrity of Science
Signed by 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences. "... For a problem as potentially catastrophic as climate change, taking no action poses a dangerous risk for our planet. ... The planet is warming due to increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. ...Most of the increase in the concentration of these gases over the last century is due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation." (2010)

U.S. Scientists and Economists' Call for Swift and Deep Cuts in Greenhouse Gas Emissions

"We call on our nation's leaders to swiftly establish and implement policies to bring about deep reductions in heat-trapping emissions. The strength of the science on climate change compels us to warn the nation about the growing risk of irreversible consequences as global average temperatures continue to increase over pre-industrial levels (i.e. prior to 1860). As temperatures rise further, the scope and severity of global warming impacts will continue to accelerate." (2008)

Increase Your Leadership on Global Warming: A Letter from California Scientists

"If emissions continue unabated, the serious consequences of a changing climate for California are likely to include a striking increase in extreme heat and heat-related mortality, significant reductions in Sierra snowpack with severe impacts on water supply, mounting challenges to agricultural production, and sea-level rise leading to more widespread erosion of California’s beaches and coastline." (2005)

Last Revised: 03/07/11


http://www.ucsusa.org/ssi/climate-change/scientific-consensus-on.html
chiefburg Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 01-31-2005
Posts: 7,384
Facts:

- Climate is changing but has done so from the dawn of time whether man was involved or not.

- Man must affect the climate in some way, even though it may be small.

- The scientists are speculating themselves to a certain degree. And, it keeps them in business.

- Al Gore is a golddigging whore who could give a crap about the climate as evidenced by his lifestyle. But, he will push the agenda (right or wrong) because it makes him look good and he makes money.

- Fuzz will argue with anyone over any subject and baits you all just for sport. And, the stuff he posts is correct because it's what he believes. The stuff others post is partisan, pussified conservative fearmongering BS.

- Climate change/global warming aside: Obama needs to go and he needs to take his cronies and Supreme Court BS with him.

- Good day....




















































I SAID GOOD DAY!
Roaster Dude Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
"Over 98% of all scientists who work in the field disagree with you"
This is a an agenda driven false statement.

In the real world this is called Lying.

You don't include funding sources for these studies.
GIBrett Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2012
Posts: 282
Roaster Dude wrote:
"Over 98% of all scientists who work in the field disagree with you"
This is a an agenda driven false statement.

In the real world this is called Lying.

You don't include funding sources for these studies.


Thank you!
DadZilla3 Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
There aren't any of those. Over 98% of all scientists who work in the field disagree with you and where they disagree with their colleagues is on issues like what can be done, when it should be done, if it even could be done and what the effects will be.


Bollocks. My home state of Pennsylvania was once a tropical rain forest. At quite another time in Earth's history it was half covered by a vast field of ice. At yet another time, it was at the bottom of a shallow sea. All before we started lining up politically correct Phd's at the government research grant trough.

The climate on this planet, and probably all the other planets in this vast universe possessing at atmosphere that isn't frozen solid, changes. They get hot, they get cold, they get wet, they get dry.

As the eminent climatologist, explorer, and raconteur Captain Geoffrey T. Spaulding once stated...'sh*t happens'.
FuzzNJ Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Roaster Dude wrote:
"Over 98% of all scientists who work in the field disagree with you"
This is a an agenda driven false statement.

In the real world this is called Lying.

You don't include funding sources for these studies.


lmao. glad you guys aren't in charge of anything.

The 98% is not a lie, it is from a gallup poll. Only 2% believed that there was no chance that substantial, human-caused
warming will occur over the next fifty to one hundred years. 98% found it to be a threat.

Cover your ears and go 'lalalalalalalala'

Also evolution didn't stop when we developed thumbs, the technology you are using to read this was developed using science, ie God did not make it, and we as a race will continue to learn new things, it's just a matter of how much the thinkers are bothered by the loud ignorant folks.
FuzzNJ Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DadZilla3 wrote:
Bollocks. My home state of Pennsylvania was once a tropical rain forest. At quite another time in Earth's history it was half covered by a vast field of ice. At yet another time, it was at the bottom of a shallow sea. All before we started lining up politically correct Phd's at the government research grant trough.

The climate on this planet, and probably all the other planets in this vast universe possessing at atmosphere that isn't frozen solid, changes. They get hot, they get cold, they get wet, they get dry.

As the eminent climatologist, explorer, and raconteur Captain Geoffrey T. Spaulding once stated...'sh*t happens'.



Yeah, Bollocks. NJ used to not exist! The planet was covered in water! We didn't have cars billions of years ago and look!

wtf dude, really?

FuzzNJ Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
GIBrett wrote:
Thank you!


Yes, thank you very much.

Hey, you really a GI?

You know that the Army is planning for man made global warming and for new green energy, right? They think it's real.
DadZilla3 Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
Yeah, Bollocks. NJ used to not exist! The planet was covered in water! We didn't have cars billions of years ago and look!

wtf dude, really?


The WTF is, these politically correct egghead chicken littles on government funded research grants are running around blaming natural climatic cycles on human activity.

Look around you Fuzz. Planet earth is constantly changing all on its own.

Hey, or maybe since mankind is so powerful we can just stop the next hurricane. No? Earthquake? No? Tsunami? No? Drought? No? How about we make it rain a little tomorrow in NJ? No?
wheelrite Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
Yes, thank you very much.

Hey, you really a GI?

You know that the Army is planning for man made global warming and for new green energy, right? They think it's real.


Hey Hazel,,

The Military is forced to do that crap...
The Army could care less about global warming,,
Their job is to kill people and tear stuff up...
stogiemonger Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2009
Posts: 4,185
Damn sunbursts!


Life was easier when there was an impending ice age looming, because the sun was slowly burning out.Whistle
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>