HockeyDad wrote:Daddy never had to write a check to make badness go away.
The difference between us is I'm willing to admit I might have wrote that check if needed and this outrages you because you would never write that check and would load the bazooka instead. When you reach those risky years of parenthood, perhaps you will stick to your guns and not write the check. Perhaps you will falter.
Few things are cut and dried. I get that. And if that is the only point you are trying to make, I get that as well.
This situation strikes me as cut and dried. This situation isn't getting a D in English, an underage drinking, or a 65 in a 55 mph speed limit situation. This person was underage, drunk, high, traveling twice the posted limit, killed four and injured two. The only price tag involved is the $420,000 resort-hab and a warning to not violate probation.
This judge's motivation is what has me most perplexed. How was the end result even an option?
I would have sat in jail. There is no reason on this planet that I shouldn't be dead, or at the very least a lifer with MACS mocking me on the other side of the bars. But it was luck (or for the enjoyment of the Godless folks here) intervention that is divine. (New thread)
At the end of the day, there is no price paid for this kids action. And bailing him out sends the wrong message. Bail for killing four? How is that even an option? Corruptable cash.
I'm working hard to be a better person, and I have been on the right track for some time now. Situations like this, and the offhanded approval of this type of thing pulls me back toward the darkness I was once in.
There is at least one poster her that has lost a loved one to a drunk driver. I haven't seen them responding. I wish they would. I don't know what the driver got for a sentence or even if he lived throw the crash. I'd like to see their thoughts.