America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by victor809. 312 replies replies.
7 Pages<1234567>
New minimum wage law blocked by GOP.
wheelrite Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrafterX wrote:
You guys gonna meet up and play in Durant this year..?? Huh


Bro !!!!!!!!!!!

not sure, but Terrie and me would love to meet up with just you guys !
We can golf while the girls Spa...

Beer

wheel,,
Brewha Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
tailgater wrote:
Sarcasm aside, what would YOU do if you owned a business?
Let's say you owned a shop in a slow part of some nothing state. Let's call it "florida".
The cost of living in this gawd-forsaken swamp area was quite low. A double wide chicken coop was considered highfalutin.

Anyhow, you're a nice guy so you pay a "fair" wage.
But then uncle sam comes along and sets a national minimum wage and it blows you out of the water.
You can't pay billy bob or his cousin Darrell anymore, at least not full time.

Do you fire them?
Or cut back on their hours?

Because either choice is akin to dancing with Beelzebub.
According to you.

Not apples to apples. I know.
But you know life has many more gray areas than black or white.
Government mandates don't use common sense.

If the liberals want to boycott Walmart, let them do it with their wallets rather than just their bad breath.

Meanwhile, it makes no sense to be hating on those who simply want to turn a profit by using legal means and putting in the work.




The only hate I'm seeing for those who simply want to turn a profit for their efforts is the republicans with their thirst for exploitation and unbridled capitalism.

As I wrote earlier, small businesses may well deserve special dispensation in order to stimulate local economies. But million and billion-dollar businesses? Why is it that you feel they deserve some special treatment too?

By the way, has it really been five years since you've given your staff raise? Hypothetically speaking of course.
DrafterX Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
wheelrite wrote:
Bro !!!!!!!!!!!

not sure, but Terrie and me would love to meet up with just you guys !
We can golf while the girls Spa...

Beer

wheel,,



not sure I'm up for golf... thought you and brewha were gonna play... I might make the drive down there tho... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
wheelrite wrote:
Bro !!!!!!!!!!!

not sure, but Terrie and me would love to meet up with just you guys !
We can golf while the girls Spa...

Beer

wheel,,

Now my last round I shot a 42. That par 28 nine-hole will never be the same!

Nice casino there at Choctaw. Maybe we'll have to organize a round. I could be there . . .
DrafterX Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Brewha wrote:
. But million and billion-dollar businesses? Why is it that you feel they deserve some special treatment too



those company's employees are paying millions and billions in taxes... as well as supporting many other small businesses who pay taxes... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Brewha wrote:
Now my last round I shot a 42. That par 28 nine-hole will never be the same!

Nice casino there at Choctaw. Maybe will have to organize a round. I could be there . . .




we should make a plan.... ThumpUp
victor809 Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
But million and billion-dollar businesses? Why is it that you feel they deserve some special treatment too?

Come on Brew... you're being disingenuous. The ability to pay the fair value of labor is NOT "special treatment".


Let's switch it around, if the labor is only worth $3/hr, why do you think Walmart has to pay $10-$20 an hour for that labor, but mom and pop only has to pay $3/hr?

Don't add any silly humanitarian claims. The work has a value of $3/hr, no more, no less. Why does a successful company have to pay more than it's worth?
Brewha Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
those company's employees are paying millions and billions in taxes... as well as supporting many other small businesses who pay taxes... Mellow

Dude, lots of those employees need food stamps. Where do you think those come from?
DrafterX Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Brewha wrote:
Dude, lots of those employees need food stamps. Where do you think those come from?



again you're assuming all of them are on food stamps or something.. it's just not true... Not talking
wheelrite Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
The only hate I'm seeing for those who simply want to turn a profit for their efforts is the republicans with their thirst for exploitation and unbridled capitalism.

As I wrote earlier, small businesses may well deserve special dispensation in order to stimulate local economies. But million and billion-dollar businesses? Why is it that you feel they deserve some special treatment too?

By the way, has it really been five years since you've given your staff raise? Hypothetically speaking of course.


unbridled Capitalism ?

what country are you living in,,,

We ( business owners) are smothered in regulations that cost $$$ and jobs for the underlings...


Btw,

Toyota is relocating from the chit hole California to the area you and I live in and have received an exemption pkge from the City of Plano. Well worth every penny.


wheel,,

Brewha Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
victor809 wrote:
Come on Brew... you're being disingenuous. The ability to pay the fair value of labor is NOT "special treatment".


Let's switch it around, if the labor is only worth $3/hr, why do you think Walmart has to pay $10-$20 an hour for that labor, but mom and pop only has to pay $3/hr?

Don't add any silly humanitarian claims. The work has a value of $3/hr, no more, no less. Why does a successful company have to pay more than it's worth?

Okay, let's pretend you really do have a magic book lists what labor is worth everywhere. So Walmart opens in Beverly Hills. And since no one is more worth more than three dollars an hour, and for some totally unexplainable reason they can't find people to work there for that. Then the government should bus in low paying labor so that the good citizens of Beverly Hills could have their shelves stocked at a labor rate that is correct?

Any job is worth what it costs you to have people do it. Get it? And if no one is willing to do the job then you have to pay more. And if you have lots of available labor and can drive the price to dirt then you can do that too. Except at some point you are driving people to slave labor - by not sharing an equitable measure of the profits for the work they do. And I would tell you that's wrong, but I don't think you get right and wrong.

Face it Victor, for you the biggest kid deserves all the milk money. And you cannot see beyond that.

So if your house keeper gets pregnant, give her a 50% pay cut. After all she's not moving as fast and now she really needs the job.





It's been five years. Stick up crowbar in your wallet and give them miserable SOBs up pay increase.
Brewha Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
again you're assuming all of them are on food stamps or something.. it's just not true... Not talking

I said "lots" not "all".

What's your guess, how many people who are on minimum-wage need food stamps and government support?
DrafterX Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Think
I think labor being brought in by bus or subway is very common... Think
Brewha Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
wheelrite wrote:
unbridled Capitalism ?

what country are you living in,,,

We ( business owners) are smothered in regulations that cost $$$ and jobs for the underlings...


Btw,

Toyota is relocating from the chit hole California to the area you and I live in and have received an exemption pkge from the City of Plano. Well worth every penny.


wheel,,


So you can' be drafted?
wheelrite Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
Now my last round I shot a 42. That par 28 nine-hole will never be the same!

Nice casino there at Choctaw. Maybe we'll have to organize a round. I could be there . . .


We sound like about the same ( as Golfers)

Let's do it !!

William can caddy for us !!

It will be fun,,
We'll smoke and drink..


wheel,,
DrafterX Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Brewha wrote:
I said "lots" not "all".

What's your guess, how many people who are on minimum-wage need food stamps and government support?



prolly just the ones with kids and no future and stuff , Walmart has lots of management opportunties and prolly pays them well... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
wheelrite wrote:
We sound like about the same ( as Golfers)

Let's do it !!

William can caddy for us !!

It will be fun,,
We'll smoke and drink..


wheel,,



no way man.... I'm not going in da woods looking for balls.... Not talking
Brewha Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
Think
I think labor being brought in by bus or subway is very common... Think

Well I reckon you out clevered me there.
Beer
wheelrite Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrafterX wrote:
no way man.... I'm not going in da woods looking for balls.... Not talking


William, I swear I won't ride the Mechanical Bull...


wheel,,

Brewha Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
no way man.... I'm not going in da woods looking for balls.... Not talking

You can take your shotgun. Tell folks it's the new TaylorMade driver......
wheelrite Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
When do you guys wanna do this thing ?

They have a nice pool there and I have a new speedo !


wheel,,
wheelrite Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
When do you guys wanna do this thing ?

They have a nice pool there and I have a new speedo !


wheel,,
wheelrite Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
When do you guys wanna do this thing ?

They have a nice pool there and I have a new speedo !


wheel,,
Brewha Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Three times? I take it you're excited about your speedo.


Me not so much.
Abrignac Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,358
A short bald guy in a speedo....

Do you wear a disco chain to go with it?
wheelrite Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
Three times? I take it you're excited about your speedo.


Me not so much.


oops...
wheelrite Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Abrignac wrote:
A short bald guy in a speedo....

Do you wear a disco chain to go with it?


I am not short...

and yes,,,
and a Gold Nugget Pinkey Ring,,,


wheel,,
DrafterX Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
wheelrite wrote:
When do you guys wanna do this thing ?

They have a nice pool there and I have a new speedo !


wheel,,



I'd prolly bring the Bounder down again.... it was cool sitting up most of the night watching the building change colors... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Anyway . . . . It sound like a boys night out for me. Drive up, hit some balls, stay the night at Choctaw and drive back.

Sounds like Drafter and his RV might dictate the schedule. I recon the course would be better during the week .. .

And Wheel, you bring the speedo and you swim alone.
wheelrite Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
Anyway . . . . It sound like a boys night out for me. Drive up, hit some balls, stay the night at Choctaw and drive back.

Sounds like Drafter and his RV might dictate the schedule. I recon the course would be better during the week .. .

And Wheel, you bring the speedo and you swim alone.


How about playing on a sunday hanging sunday afternoon/ night and heading home on monday ?


wheel,,
DrafterX Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
prolly have to be a Saturday/saturday night for me... I'm starting a new job and stuff.... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Sounds good. Two hour drive for me, we would need a late morning T time.

Drafter, you gonna hit some balls or not?


And a Sunday night would be better. Can't you call in sick??? I can call them for you - Dr. Brewha at your service . . . .
DrafterX Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Brewha wrote:
Sounds good. Two hour drive for me, we would need a late morning T time.

Drafter, you gonna hit some balls or not?


And a Sunday night would be better. Can't you call in sick??? I can call them for you - Dr. Brewha at your service . . . .



could happen I suppose.. we just need to set a date.... Think
eye2 Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 04-30-2014
Posts: 227
^ Is your handle like RacerX from Speed Racer?
Abrignac Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,358
eye2 wrote:
I guess we're in luck then. We have a government willing to sacrifice our own homeland.

I shouldn't talk about politics. The current state of affairs is overly aggravating. And I like to come off as a nice (at least decent/honest) person.

Last post for me in the Politics forum.


Peace Out.




eye2 wrote:
^ Is your handle like RacerX from Speed Racer?




That didn't last long....

Shame on you
DrafterX Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
eye2 wrote:
^ Is your handle like RacerX from Speed Racer?



Mellow
wheelrite Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrafterX wrote:
could happen I suppose.. we just need to set a date.... Think


In June ?

and yes Willam you are gonna play,,,

or else...

Brewha bring your wife or partner, whatever..

I'll get the golf set up when you girls decide a date .
can't do the weekend of the 21/22nd. My dad's B-day,,


wheel,,
wheelrite Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrafterX wrote:
could happen I suppose.. we just need to set a date.... Think


In June ?

and yes Willam you are gonna play,,,

or else...

Brewha bring your wife or partner, whatever..

I'll get the golf set up when you girls decide a date .
can't do the weekend of the 21/22nd. My dad's B-day,,


wheel,,
DrafterX Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Mellow
victor809 Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
Okay, let's pretend you really do have a magic book lists what labor is worth everywhere. So Walmart opens in Beverly Hills. And since no one is more worth more than three dollars an hour, and for some totally unexplainable reason they can't find people to work there for that. Then the government should bus in low paying labor so that the good citizens of Beverly Hills could have their shelves stocked at a labor rate that is correct?

Any job is worth what it costs you to have people do it. Get it? And if no one is willing to do the job then you have to pay more. And if you have lots of available labor and can drive the price to dirt then you can do that too. Except at some point you are driving people to slave labor - by not sharing an equitable measure of the profits for the work they do. And I would tell you that's wrong, but I don't think you get right and wrong.

Face it Victor, for you the biggest kid deserves all the milk money. And you cannot see beyond that.

So if your house keeper gets pregnant, give her a 50% pay cut. After all she's not moving as fast and now she really needs the job.





It's been five years. Stick up crowbar in your wallet and give them miserable SOBs up pay increase.


Dude... you never took an economics class did you?
If the value of a labor is worth less than what the labor pool is willing to do the work for, then the work does not get done. This isn't hard to understand. If specific labor produces $1 worth of value for an hour's worth of work (as in the intrinsic value of the goods increases by $1 due to an hour's worth of labor), I can't pay $10 for the labor. If no one will work for the $1, then the work is not worth doing within our society.

And no, a job is NOT "worth what it costs to have people do it". If the product of that job is worth less than the labor the people producing it demand, then it's not going to happen.

You simply don't get it. You want to have your cake and eat it too. I have simply pointed out to you that your desire to raise the minimum wage (you've never said to what level, but as you claim all workers must have a living wage, I will assume it is to between $10 and $20 an hour) will have significant impact on the demand curve surrounding labor. I asked you to explain how you'd deal with that.... and you fall back to "you're an evil fat cat capitalist" claims.

Get better at your arguments Brew, and stop dodging my points, I get very bored when you don't actually engage in a conversation.
Hillbillyjosh770 Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 02-09-2014
Posts: 2,999
Sounds like they are just trying to give an incentive for all the lazy fugs of MERICA to get off there arses and get a job. I remember when mw was 4.25 and I busted my Azz for that paycheck and was proud of it.
DrafterX Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I keep saying it's just a way to make the small business dude support Obamacare..... Obama thinks the minimum wage worker will give him their new found moneys.... Mellow
cacman Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
It's all about the wealth distribution agenda.
I reminded of the Ant and the Grasshoper fable.
victor809 Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Another interesting twist on the concept of a minimum wage is demanded value.

On an extreme scale, you're looking at the difference between hiring 5 $2/hr laborers to monkey around and eventually maybe get something done, vs hiring 1 $10/hr laborer who can get the same work done in the same time. Employers will be more selective on who they hire, and as long as we have such a high unemployment, they will be able to be.

Essentially, if you fix the minimum wage to some value (let's say $10/hr) you are ensuring that individuals who are simply unable to produce anything of that value will never be hired. They will always have an income of 0, and will be eternal welfare draws. They have no opportunity to even contribute some part of their livelihood, because an hour of their work is not worth the federally mandated price.
tailgater Offline
#195 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Another interesting twist on the concept of a minimum wage is demanded value.

On an extreme scale, you're looking at the difference between hiring 5 $2/hr laborers to monkey around and eventually maybe get something done, vs hiring 1 $10/hr laborer who can get the same work done in the same time. Employers will be more selective on who they hire, and as long as we have such a high unemployment, they will be able to be.

Essentially, if you fix the minimum wage to some value (let's say $10/hr) you are ensuring that individuals who are simply unable to produce anything of that value will never be hired. They will always have an income of 0, and will be eternal welfare draws. They have no opportunity to even contribute some part of their livelihood, because an hour of their work is not worth the federally mandated price.


Well, they could always go into politics.
tailgater Offline
#196 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Actually, Vic, for the most part an employer will only hire one of those $2/hour laborers.
The employer generally doesn't say "I've got $10 per hour to give."
They say "I need X amount of man-hours to perform a task"

Further, regardless of what the mandated minimum is, it doesn't make the worker any more qualified.
And even at the $2/hour you cite, why would an employer accept sub-par performance?
If a higher skill level is required, they'd have to pay MORE than the minimum regardless of where that is set.

victor809 Offline
#197 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Actually, Vic, for the most part an employer will only hire one of those $2/hour laborers.
The employer generally doesn't say "I've got $10 per hour to give."
They say "I need X amount of man-hours to perform a task"

Further, regardless of what the mandated minimum is, it doesn't make the worker any more qualified.
And even at the $2/hour you cite, why would an employer accept sub-par performance?
If a higher skill level is required, they'd have to pay MORE than the minimum regardless of where that is set.



Yes and no.
If an employer is paying $2/hr, and estimates they need x man hours to do the task, they hire sufficient laborers to accomplish within the time.

If the work takes X+y man hours to complete, and the employer is only paying $2/hr, they probably aren't going to care about the overage as much as if the employer is paying $10/hr. They are going to be more selective at $10/hr than they are at $2/hr. I'm not talking "skilled labor", I'm just talking about not re-hiring people who don't accomplish the task by the deadline, or are insolent... or are on cbid all day.... Whistle

Whether we like it or not, every worker out there has an "efficiency". Some workers, if you give them 1 hour of labor, they accomplish it in 30min. Others, it takes 1.10hrs to accomplish. the more you force employers to pay for that hour of labor, the more they will emphasize retaining the more efficient laborers, to minimize their loss in the labor cost increases. Companies will become leaner and more efficient (a good thing), but that means the inefficient workers will be left as a burden upon society (which brewha is theoretically trying to avoid by raising the minimum wage).
tailgater Offline
#198 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Yes and no.
If an employer is paying $2/hr, and estimates they need x man hours to do the task, they hire sufficient laborers to accomplish within the time.

If the work takes X+y man hours to complete, and the employer is only paying $2/hr, they probably aren't going to care about the overage as much as if the employer is paying $10/hr. They are going to be more selective at $10/hr than they are at $2/hr. I'm not talking "skilled labor", I'm just talking about not re-hiring people who don't accomplish the task by the deadline, or are insolent... or are on cbid all day.... Whistle

Whether we like it or not, every worker out there has an "efficiency". Some workers, if you give them 1 hour of labor, they accomplish it in 30min. Others, it takes 1.10hrs to accomplish. the more you force employers to pay for that hour of labor, the more they will emphasize retaining the more efficient laborers, to minimize their loss in the labor cost increases. Companies will become leaner and more efficient (a good thing), but that means the inefficient workers will be left as a burden upon society (which brewha is theoretically trying to avoid by raising the minimum wage).


Vic,
We're talking mandated minimum wages here.
Raising it from $2/hr to $10/hr doesn't make the worker worth more.
It doesn't make them more efficient and it doesn't make them work harder.
If one guy in a $2/hour world was indeed 5X better at his job, he'd be getting paid the $10/hour already.

Raising the minimums helps the teenagers, the part timers, and those whose work ability is worth less than $10/hour (by choice or by circumstance).

Good workers don't make minimum wage. At least not for very long.

victor809 Offline
#199 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Vic,
We're talking mandated minimum wages here.
Raising it from $2/hr to $10/hr doesn't make the worker worth more.
It doesn't make them more efficient and it doesn't make them work harder.
If one guy in a $2/hour world was indeed 5X better at his job, he'd be getting paid the $10/hour already.

Not if you talk to Brew... he's pretty convinced that no matter what the labor is worth, evil companies are trying to pay less than the worker is worth. For the record, I think you're both right on this, because it depends on the type of work and the mentality of the worker.

Quote:

Raising the minimums helps the teenagers, the part timers, and those whose work ability is worth less than $10/hour (by choice or by circumstance).

Good workers don't make minimum wage. At least not for very long.


This depends on what the minimum wage is in relation to how "good" the worker is. I'm not talking about the best workers, I'm talking about people on the margins here. None of the hypothetical workers we're talking about are worth more than whatever magical number Brew wants to set the minimum wage to.

And for the record, if we were only talking about teenagers and intentionally part-time labor there is absolutely no good reason to raise it to a living wage. These are not individuals looking for a job with which to support themselves and/or their family. We're talking about people who's work ability is worth less than (magic number)/hr.
stogiefan Offline
#200 Posted:
Joined: 10-23-2012
Posts: 80
tailgater wrote:
Vic,
We're talking mandated minimum wages here.
Raising it from $2/hr to $10/hr doesn't make the worker worth more.
It doesn't make them more efficient and it doesn't make them work harder.
If one guy in a $2/hour world was indeed 5X better at his job, he'd be getting paid the $10/hour already.

Raising the minimums helps the teenagers, the part timers, and those whose work ability is worth less than $10/hour (by choice or by circumstance).

Good workers don't make minimum wage. At least not for very long.



Raising the minimums does not help teenagers or those with limited work history. It raises the lowest rung on the ladder to a level they don't have the work skills to meet and prices them out of work. Bottom line if you produce less than $10/hr or whatever the arbitrary minimum is you become unemployable.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages<1234567>