America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by tonygraz. 233 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
Trump Update
teddyballgame Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
victor809 wrote:
First.... huh? Now I'm not a government expert, but I'm guessing you aren't either, because I did a rudimentary wikipedia search and the government shutdown (2013) was due to the house and senate being unable to come to an agreement on the budget. Since the president doesn't get to write or approve the budget, I don't see how he can be responsible for the shutdown.



victor I am not surprised you don't know who is ultimately responsible for government shutdowns. The house passed a bill and sent it to the Senate and Harry Reid wouldn't take up the spending bill and put it to a vote. If we follow your "logic", since the Dems didn't pass a budget in Reid's tenure, the government should have shut down then, every year.

The President is responsible for a government shutdown. It has been done 18 times since Ford and every time, it has been said that the president (either party) shut down the government....until this time. Just because the media repeats the lie over and over, doesn't make it so.

Here, read Thomas Sowell, a brilliant economist:

http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2013/10/04/who-shut-down-the-government-n1716292/page/full
teedubbya Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Love him or hate him Newt owned his shutdown and it was orchestrated and planned. As were Tip's. If you go back and read the contemporary headlines it usually falls on congress who of course has the power of the purse. Newts writings make it clear it was his and he's proud of it. He had a plan. The current congress doesn't.

Revisionist history is an interesting thing.
victor809 Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teddyballgame wrote:
victor I am not surprised you don't know who is ultimately responsible for government shutdowns. The house passed a bill and sent it to the Senate and Harry Reid wouldn't take up the spending bill and put it to a vote. If we follow your "logic", since the Dems didn't pass a budget in Reid's tenure, the government should have shut down then, every year.

The President is responsible for a government shutdown. It has been done 18 times since Ford and every time, it has been said that the president (either party) shut down the government....until this time. Just because the media repeats the lie over and over, doesn't make it so.

Here, read Thomas Sowell, a brilliant economist:

http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2013/10/04/who-shut-down-the-government-n1716292/page/full

I'm not surprised there is a lot about government which I don't know. But I read to fill the gaps.

I am surprised you think you know what happens in the government, since you don't even bother reading the articles you use to defend your position. That article didn't say it was Obama's government shutdown. The article simply defended the House's right to submit any budget they want. How exactly do you think you can blame this on Obama still? He wasn't responsible for proposing the budget or passing it, and he never got an opportunity to veto it.

But go on... Tell us how it's always the president who shuts down the government.

You don't actually think there's a but red switch or something do you?
teddyballgame Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Pull quote from the article:

"If Senator Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run ObamaCare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility.

You cannot blame other people for not giving you everything you want. And it is a fraud to blame them when you refuse to use the money they did vote, even when it is ample to pay for everything else in the government.

The ball is in the president's court, no matter whose party it is.

Government shutdowns are the exclusive result of presidential inaction.

It happens, the presidents own it.. I am good with it.. the essential business of the government is not shutdown.
Money is coming in, the debt is paid first, SS checks and military checks are going out, etc.

As I stated before, Reagan shut it down 8 times and it was on him- I am not blaming the Dems in congress in those situations.

I liked Newt and when the shut down occurred, it was on Clinton- he was sent a bill and he vetoed it.

Not exactly revisionist history here.

Furthermore, I am not sure what a "but red switch" is. but it sounds kinda kinky and it is probably something Bill Clinton had installed while in office.
I am not down for that.
tonygraz Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
Now I know why you like Cruz. He said he shut the government down and then a few weeks later said he didn't (and probably blamed it on Obama).
teedubbya Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
RollEyes
Speyside Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
So the president should sign a budget/spending bill whether he agrees with it or not? Even if the bill never gets to his desk it's still his fault for a government shutdown? No one gets hurt even if there is no money to pay for various services?
DrafterX Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Everybody still gets paid.. even if they didn't work.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Stop, I say stop it boy, you’re doin’ alot of choppin’ but no chips are flyin'
DrafterX Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
I'm sorry... Sad
teddyballgame Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
I didn't say the president should or shouldn't sign anything.. that is up to him and up to the congress to over ride it or not.

83% of the government does not get shut down and all essential services.. we are not going to "default" as the lie goes. There is money to pay.. do taxes stop coming in with a government shutdown?
teedubbya Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
one of the biggest problems with our government is there is no correlation between taxes collected and expenditures.
teddyballgame Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tonygraz wrote:
Now I know why you like Cruz. He said he shut the government down and then a few weeks later said he didn't (and probably blamed it on Obama).


I didn't see that quote.

perhaps you can provide proof on your statement?
teedubbya Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
I'm sorry... Sad


Nice mannered kid, just a little on the dumb side
teddyballgame Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
teedubbya wrote:
one of the biggest problems with our government is there is no correlation between taxes collected and expenditures.



Here Here!

That is why Milton Freedman's suggestion of the government only being allowed to spend 17 or 18% of GDP every year is a good idea.
teedubbya Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm with Teddy on this one. I don't think Ted ever owned it. He is disingenuous and would never do so.
victor809 Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teddyballgame wrote:
Pull quote from the article:

"If Senator Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run ObamaCare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility.

You cannot blame other people for not giving you everything you want. And it is a fraud to blame them when you refuse to use the money they did vote, even when it is ample to pay for everything else in the government.

The ball is in the president's court, no matter whose party it is.

Government shutdowns are the exclusive result of presidential inaction.

... dude...
You realize that if the bill doesn't get to the president, he can't "refuse to accept" the money... right? If the senate had passed it and Obama refused to sign it then it would be Obama's shutdown. But it never got that far. The fact that you keep trying to pin this on Obama sort of highlights how myopic you are on this issue.... A partisan might choose to blame this on Republican congress for passing a bill that they knew would never get through. A partisan might choose to blame this on Democrat Senators for refusing to pass the republican budget (which they wouldn't pass because the republican congress refused to include obamacare).... but it takes a special sort of lack of understanding to blame it on the part of our government it never got to.

Quote:


It happens, the presidents own it.. I am good with it.. the essential business of the government is not shutdown.
Money is coming in, the debt is paid first, SS checks and military checks are going out, etc.

As I stated before, Reagan shut it down 8 times and it was on him- I am not blaming the Dems in congress in those situations.

I liked Newt and when the shut down occurred, it was on Clinton- he was sent a bill and he vetoed it.

Not exactly revisionist history here.

first, a shutdown costs money. Everyone furloughed eventually gets paid even if they do no work. A government shutdown is simply increasing expense, which if you're a true conservative you should be against... so don't give me that "hurts no one" bs...
Second, your reagan examples were from him actually vetoing bills. You know... bills that made it to his desk because the senate and house agreed on it.
Third, and hilariously, aren't you the one who said reagan never compromised??? Look through the resolution of those shutdowns and you'll find he frequently got some of what he wanted and gave of some of what he wanted for the shutdown to end.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/25/here-is-every-previous-government-shutdown-why-they-happened-and-how-they-ended/

Quote:

Furthermore, I am not sure what a "but red switch" is. but it sounds kinda kinky and it is probably something Bill Clinton had installed while in office.
I am not down for that.

That was supposed to read "big red switch"....
Your lack of kink is your own issue.
DrafterX Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Anything that happens under Obama's watch is Obama's fault... unless the rules changed since Bush was in office... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
Anything that happens under Obama's watch is Obama's fault... unless the rules changed since Bush was in office... Mellow


I don't recall bush ever being blamed for actions of congress. Do you? Can you link a thread?
DrafterX Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Everything is still Bush's fault... I think you're purposely not seeing the point again just to argue... Shame on you
victor809 Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
Everything is still Bush's fault... I think you're purposely not seeing the point again just to argue... Shame on you


Plenty of things are bush's fault. Just as plenty of things are obama's fault. Things that relate directly to the executive branch of the US government.... invading countries, not invading countries... hell, I'll even blame obama for obamacare (even though, despite how much conservatives want to claim otherwise, it was passed through congress as a bill)... but I'd like you to find a single instance on cbid where bush was blamed for congress not passing something.
teedubbya Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Well at least it will all not be Obamas fault soon
DrafterX Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Apparently it's not now... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard he didn't sign a bill he never received and stuff
DrafterX Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Did he get banned..?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
no they stopped doing that around the time Lincoln went to the theater.
DrafterX Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
but I'd like you to find a single instance on cbid where bush was blamed for congress not passing something.


#17 Posted: Tue, Dec 9 2007, 6:29 PM
victor809 wrote:
Today Bush was blamed for congress not passing something.



Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
#17 Posted: Tue, Dec 9 2007, 6:29 PM



Mellow


OhMyGod
DrafterX Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
it wasn't hard to find... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
#17 Posted: Tue, Dec 9 2007, 6:29 PM



Mellow


Man... that was really mean and blamey of me.
teedubbya Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
and stuff!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
victor809 wrote:
hell, I'll even blame obama for obamacare (even though, despite how much conservatives want to claim otherwise, it was passed through congress as a bill).



And the Supreme Court upheld it as a tax!Not talking Not talking Not talking
DrMaddVibe Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
“Trump has risen because voters see him as authentic, independent, direct, firm, — and believe he can’t be bought,” Baker writes. “These are the same character traits our candidates should be advancing in 2016. That’s Trump lesson #1.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/private-memo-lays-out-how-the-gop-would-deal-with-trump-as-its-nominee/2015/12/02/78514cba-9909-11e5-94f0-9eeaff906ef3_story.html


Sounds like the GOP is learning as they go and don't want to be left at the station.
teddyballgame Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
victor809 wrote:

Third, and hilariously, aren't you the one who said reagan never compromised??? Look through the resolution of those shutdowns and you'll find he frequently got some of what he wanted and gave of some of what he wanted for the shutdown to end.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/25/here-is-every-previous-government-shutdown-why-they-happened-and-how-they-ended/



I don't believe I ever said Reagan never compromised.. of course he did, but his compromising wasn't kowtowing and moving left, and not having the left move right.

Find where I said Reagan never compromised.
victor809 Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teddyballgame wrote:
I don't believe I ever said Reagan never compromised.. of course he did, but his compromising wasn't kowtowing and moving left, and not having the left move right.

Find where I said Reagan never compromised.


My mistake... you said he "would not compromise with current democrats" (essentially saying nothing, as it's a fantastical idea that can be neither proven nor disproven...

Quote:

Reagan would not horse trade with a socialistic minded party like the democrats are now. He would explain his case and again force the democrats to move right.
tonygraz Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,284
teddyballgame wrote:
I don't believe I ever said Reagan never compromised.. of course he did, but his compromising wasn't kowtowing and moving left, and not having the left move right.

Find where I said Reagan never compromised.

DrMaddVibe Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Tony...drops the mic...boom!
victor809 Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teddyballgame wrote:
I don't believe I ever said Reagan never compromised.. of course he did, but his compromising wasn't kowtowing and moving left, and not having the left move right.

Find where I said Reagan never compromised.


But you agree with my first two points? That the shut-down in 2013 had nothing to do with Obama? Or are you just quietly dropping that and trying to jump on my third throwaway point, which was just a point of amusement for me and not actually part of our discussion?
teedubbya Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Hey Vic. I want to buy your 400g rolls Royce. I'll give you $20 for it. No? It's your fault you don't want to sell. It's on you.
victor809 Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
Hey Vic. I want to buy your 400g rolls Royce. I'll give you $20 for it. No? It's your fault you don't want to sell. It's on you.


Funny enough, the situation isn't even that vague. The real example would be if you wanted to buy my 400k Rolls Royce for $20, but your wife wouldn't let you... but it's still my fault even though I never saw the offer.
Abrignac Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
victor809 wrote:
Funny enough, the situation isn't even that vague. The real example would be if you wanted to buy my 400k Rolls Royce for $20, but your wife wouldn't let you... but it's still my fault even though I never saw the offer.


Thats bull$hit Victor and you know it. You're always trying to stir up $hit. Your Rolls isn't worth $400k unless someone cleans the pi$$ off, otherwise it will corrode and fall apart just like the light posts.
victor809 Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
Thats bull$hit Victor and you know it. You're always trying to stir up $hit. Your Rolls isn't worth $400k unless someone cleans the pi$$ off, otherwise it will corrode and fall apart just like the light posts.

Psh...
Do you have any idea the concentration of crack in the homeless urine here in SF? You could get high just licking the tires of that rolls... if anything it raises the value. I was giving tw a deal not counting the $50k worth of crack and meth pissed on the side of the car.
ZRX1200 Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
"Passed through congress as a bill"


You're a real peach Victor. Tell me when a major piece of legislation passed in the manor of that pile of schit.
victor809 Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
"Passed through congress as a bill"


You're a real peach Victor. Tell me when a major piece of legislation passed in the manor of that pile of schit.


Dude... the house voted on it and passed it, and the senate voted on it and passed it. The main difference in how it was passed was that there wasn't yet another opportunity to filibuster the bill... they still voted on it and passed it.
dstieger Offline
#195 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
ZRX1200 wrote:
"Passed through congress as a bill"


You're a real peach Victor. Tell me when a major piece of legislation passed in the manor of that pile of schit.



They should wrap the bills in corn.....maybe they'd come through more intact instead of being turned into 'pile(s) of schit' by the time they pass
Brewha Offline
#196 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
If they wrapped it in corn shucks and got it through, would that be called slipping the tamale?
tamapatom Offline
#197 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Brewha wrote:
If they wrapped it in corn shucks and got it through, would that be called slipping the tamale?

With hot sauce????
banderl Offline
#198 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
TMCTLT wrote:
And who took itin the F*n shorts when OBUMMER bailed out the banks who were Too BIG to FAIL??? Shame on you





LMAO!
TMCTLT Offline
#199 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
banderl wrote:
LMAO!




I was certain that football comment would get your panties in a bunch and send you off topping **** I posted....

Mission accomplished LMAO
banderl Offline
#200 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
TMCTLT wrote:
I was certain that football comment would get your panties in a bunch and send you off topping **** I posted....

Mission accomplished LMAO




Always happy to point out your extreme ignorance.
Thanks for being you.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>