America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by DrafterX. 159 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Obama Blows Up Fox News Lies and The GOP
gummy jones Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Just sitting here waiting for all these unfunded liabilities to bankrupt their states. Once a couple clamor for bailouts they will start dropping like flies.
Burner02 Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Wonijack wrote:
Only problem is that the facts he quotes are manufactured numbers. The. Middle class is dying off. The welfare class is growing. Jobs are down. Unemployment is higher than the numbers because many people just can't find work and aren't counted as unemployed. Wages are stagnant. Stocks are wobbly.

I guess if you think the growth of government is good then we are doing great. But soon there will be not enough working to take care of the nonworking. Fox News is not the culprit. They are conservative based and many people hate conservatives because they want people to be part of the solution and not just be part of the nanny state.




Be very careful for you will be condemned for your above thoughts but well played.
frankj1 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,228
Wonijack wrote:
Only problem is that the facts he quotes are manufactured numbers. The. Middle class is dying off. The welfare class is growing. Jobs are down. Unemployment is higher than the numbers because many people just can't find work and aren't counted as unemployed. Wages are stagnant. Stocks are wobbly.

I guess if you think the growth of government is good then we are doing great. But soon there will be not enough working to take care of the nonworking. Fox News is not the culprit. They are conservative based and many people hate conservatives because they want people to be part of the solution and not just be part of the nanny state.

no hate at all, just am only hearing "libs must be stopped, just say no".
I'd love to hear solutions. My vote is still available...Johnson/Weld have more to propose.
gummy jones Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969

maybe only half the amount of unicorns and rainbows as obama suggests?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-idUSKCN0YO1I8

and even some of the numbers in this report are noticeably cooked

dont get me wrong, im doing okay but i certainly cant extrapolate that to the entire economy
Abrignac Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
victor809 wrote:
Why are you guys so sure it's doing poorly?
Certainly the two regions of the country I've lived in have been growing in wealth, in property value, in job availability since Obama came into office.

I've almost doubled my rate in the past 7 years. We literally cannot find people to do the work that needs to be done, and we're talking about 100k/year as the bottom rates. There's a lot of work, and a ton of growth in this region and in this industry.

With that in mind, why are you all so sure that the economy is in shambles?



I guess 100k a year is not enough to lure someone to pay $2000 a month for an apartment across the street from a light pole corroded by pi$$ even if the can watch Beulah bend over and vertically smile.
teedubbya Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm in! Where do I sign up.
TMCTLT Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
The OP could've STOPPED right after typing the first two title words of his post.....

OBAMA BLOWS

There's sumpin we CAN agree on Beer
Gene363 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
So Obama was great to whites and not so good to blacks.

From NBC:

Quote:
Unemployment -- According to the Department of Labor, when President Obama took office in January 2008, the Black unemployment rate was 12.7 percent. The best Black unemployment number during the Obama Administration so far was in June 2015 at 9.5 percent. The best Black unemployment rate during George Bush's presidency was 7.7 percent in August 2007. The worst number under Bush was 12.1 in December 2008. The worst Black unemployment under Obama was 16.8 in March 2011 -- a 28 year high -- according to the Department of Labor.

But the landscape is a bit more complicated than the numbers. In 2011, evidence of a so-called "Black Manession" emerged. In September 2014, reports on the Black female unemployment rate showed at 10.6 percent, the same as it was the year before. Many assert that hiring discrimination and the fact that many have left the job market all together are factors for high Black unemployment overall.

Poverty -- The poverty rate for African Americans has become worse over the past few years. It was 25 percent when President Bush left office. It rose to 28 percent in 2013 -- the most recent stat available. One out of three black children, 38 percent of all African American children, lived in poverty in 2013, as reported by PEW on July 14. Overall, there are more people living in poverty in the U.S. than at other time in U.S. history at 45 million people.


http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/donald-trump-right-what-obamas-done-black-america-n403881
Abrignac Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
But wait, didn't he double the national debt. Why not brag about that???
Gene363 Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
Abrignac wrote:
But wait, didn't he double the national debt. Why not brag about that???


Point, he also 'fixed' health care, everyone is thrilled with their new higher premiums and mammoth deductibles.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
I like that we've closed Guantanamo Bay and ended all military actions.

tailgater Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
banderl wrote:
Too many dudes with man buns up there.


Some people only see what their heart desires.

victor809 Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
I guess 100k a year is not enough to lure someone to pay $2000 a month for an apartment across the street from a light pole corroded by pi$$ even if the can watch Beulah bend over and vertically smile.


Hehe.
If people were that unwilling to live next to the pizz covered light pole, the rent wouldn't be 2k a month. :)

It's a sad (?) state of our city that housing demand is so high that a neighborhood like mine is able to demand such a ridiculous rent.

And to be fair, 2k/mo is still only approx 1/3 of their after-tax income, so theoretically an acceptable cost for rent.
DrafterX Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I like that we've closed Guantanamo Bay and ended all military actions.




He's not done yet... One 737 will empty Guantanamo over night... Mellow
banderl Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
tailgater wrote:
Some people only see what their heart desires.




So that was you.
banderl Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Abrignac wrote:
But wait, didn't he double the national debt. Why not brag about that???



Let's be honest and tell the whole story, Anthony. If you're going to point the finger at one, you'd better be prepared to point it at all of them.
W doubled the debt (101%) during his presidency and Raygun nearly tripled it (186%) during his.
How quickly some of us forget.
TMCTLT Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
banderl wrote:
Let's be honest and tell the whole story, Anthony. If you're going to point the finger at one, you'd better be prepared to point it at all of them.
W doubled the debt (101%) during his presidency and Raygun nearly tripled it (186%) during his.
How quickly some of us forget.



I just love.....deflection

MOM....he did it first
Burner02 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
Let's be honest and tell the whole story, Anthony. If you're going to point the finger at one, you'd better be prepared to point it at all of them.
W doubled the debt (101%) during his presidency and Raygun nearly tripled it (186%) during his.
How quickly some of us forget.



Reagan - Brought down the wall.

H - Desert Shield/Desert Storm

W - Post 911

Billary - smoked cigars, fired a rocket at a camel and Kosovo.

Barry - Ended two wars and gave birth to ISIS.
Gene363 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
Burner02 wrote:
Reagan - Brought down the wall.

H - Desert Shield/Desert Storm

W - Post 911

Billary - smoked cigars, fired a rocket at a camel and Kosovo.

Barry - Ended two wars and gave birth to ISIS.


Huh, apparently not in Iraq or Afghanistan, we still have people getting killed in those sh|tholes and he extended the war to Yemen Libya Syria and who knows where else.
banderl Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Who started those wars in Irag and Afghanistan?
Again, how quickly some forget.
Mattie B Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
We also need to credit Obama with the severe shortage of ammo.


I've been searching the last 5 years for .22 rifle ammo. I can find some occasionally here or there, but the price has more than doubled.

The rounds Ocho uses to deer hunt could only be found online. I couldn't find the round I have hunted with for years....so I had to change.

Abrignac Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
banderl wrote:
Let's be honest and tell the whole story, Anthony. If you're going to point the finger at one, you'd better be prepared to point it at all of them.
W doubled the debt (101%) during his presidency and Raygun nearly tripled it (186%) during his.
How quickly some of us forget.


Reagan did add considerably to the debt through defense spending. But, look what was accomplished. He wanted a 600 ship Navy. Did we need it? Debatable but it created plenty of high paying jobs for US Citizens in R&D as well as giving unskilled workers an opportunity to serve. Consider the everyday technology that we've become accustomed to. Most of it is offspring of military R&D. So you're correct, there was a benefit to society. Unlike what we've experienced otherwise.

If Obama were to have increased the size of our forces US Citizens would be giving something back for the payments they receive. Instead, we spend $$$ that could support wages for jobs with transferable skills to give free cellphones.

Makes sense to some. Others not so much.
DrafterX Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
banderl wrote:
Who started those wars in Irag and Afghanistan?
Again, how quickly some forget.




You obviously forgot.. Shame on you
Gene363 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
banderl wrote:
Who started those wars in Irag and Afghanistan?
Again, how quickly some forget.


Bush with the consent of Hillary.

Who committed to end them?
banderl Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
TMCTLT wrote:
I just love.....deflection

MOM....he did it first



Deflection?
Do you even know what that means?
I pointed out some facts to Anthony, nothing more.
banderl Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Abrignac wrote:
Reagan did add considerably to the debt through defense spending. But, look what was accomplished. He wanted a 600 ship Navy. Did we need it? Debatable but it created plenty of high paying jobs for US Citizens in R&D as well as giving unskilled workers an opportunity to serve. Consider the everyday technology that we've become accustomed to. Most of it is offspring of military R&D. So you're correct, there was a benefit to society. Unlike what we've experienced otherwise.

If Obama were to have increased the size of our forces US Citizens would be giving something back for the payments they receive. Instead, we spend $$$ that could support wages for jobs with transferable skills to give free cellphones.

Makes sense to some. Others not so much.



The fact remains, he almost tripled the debt. No excuses for W's doubling down?
Free phones were not started by Obama, but I'm sure that you knew that.
banderl Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Gene363 wrote:
Bush with the consent of Hillary.

Who committed to end them?


Almost everyone was sucked into supporting Bush's wars because the administration was supplying false intell info to Congress.
DrafterX Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
wow really..?? never heard that one before..... Mellow
Mattie B Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Ever notice how the liberals here will argue nonstop about theory and policy, but when I give "real life impact" the silence is deafening.


Abrignac Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
banderl wrote:
The fact remains, he almost tripled the debt. No excuses for W's doubling down?
Free phones were not started by Obama, but I'm sure that you knew that.


If one were to judge a Presidency strictly on the basis of the debt rate it would be glaring, But, that's not the only way we do so.

Ronald Reagan left office in January of 1989
At the end of 1988 National Revenue was 35.22% of the National Debt.
At the end of 2015 National Revenue was 17.05% of the National Debt.

Based on those numbers, Obama years have left us twice the debt effect as Reagan.

You're right again, Obama didn't start the phone giveaway. But, I don't recall such a density of pop up tents in low income areas giving away multiple cell phones to just about anyone who wanted them during Reagan's years in office.

But, I'm sure you already knew all of that.
victor809 Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Your real life impact isn't because of Obama. I've not seen any laws restricting ammo sales, have you?

If there's an ammo shortage, it's either the manufacturers or retailers creating artificial scarcity, or consumers panicking and creating a run on the inventory.

DrafterX Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
or the gubment is buying it all up to create a shortage and raise prices... Mellow
Gene363 Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
victor809 wrote:
Your real life impact isn't because of Obama. I've not seen any laws restricting ammo sales, have you?

If there's an ammo shortage, it's either the manufacturers or retailers creating artificial scarcity, or consumers panicking and creating a run on the inventory.



Or Homeland Security buying a few billion rounds.
Mattie B Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Victor I doubt you purchase much ammo, so I won't ask that you know the subject.

And before I call you out, I'll allow you to research how Obama has impacted ammo.
Burner02 Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
Who started those wars in Irag and Afghanistan?
Again, how quickly some forget.




What if Billary had taken Sudan up on their offer of giving up Osama bin Laden in 1996. It is much easier for the left to blame Bush than the real culprit. If Billary had taken them up on their offer, 911 may never have occurred and there would not have been a reason to go into Afghanistan or Iraq as retribution.
Burner02 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
Almost everyone was sucked into supporting Bush's wars because the administration was supplying false intell info to Congress.



I think for the record it was the CIA that provided the bad intel but you spin it the way you want.
victor809 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Mattie, don't be shy. You're telling me that you can't buy. 22 rifle ammo, that it isn't in stock... I'm trying to figure out how this is Obama's fault, since I've not seen him restrict the amount of ammo which can be kept in Stock by retailers. Maybe he has, feel free to point it out.
Abrignac Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
victor809 wrote:
Mattie, don't be shy. You're telling me that you can't buy. 22 rifle ammo, that it isn't in stock... I'm trying to figure out how this is Obama's fault, since I've not seen him restrict the amount of ammo which can be kept in Stock by retailers. Maybe he has, feel free to point it out.


A bit more complicated than that. The federal government has been on a massive ammo buying kick. I've seen numbers quoted in the billions. Not sure exactly what the number is but its massive. Nearly every government agency has outstanding orders for ammunition. So factories that would normally produce large varieties of ammo have been focusing on the government orders. Thus perhaps they have scaled back non-military varieties of ammunition. Add in the fact that there have been ammo shortages since shortly after Obama won the election due to his anti-gun rhetoric. This has led to ammunition flying off the shelf as fas as it is received at sales outlets. In some cases, people working at retail outlets hold back ammo to sell to family and friends. Not to mention people stocking up as soon as they see it on shelves due to shortages.

All this had created the "perfect storm" for ammo purchasing.
Mattie B Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Victor the above is correct. I hate to cut and paste here. I promise you can easily find the correlation of ammo prices/availability to this administration.


I wouldn't steer you wrong buddy. I promise it's there.
Burner02 Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
I have been on this earth since 52 and there has never been a shortage of any ammo until O took office.

Just saying!
tonygraz Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,288
Is that really a bad thing ?
Mattie B Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
When I can't take my son hunting.....


YEAH ITS A BAD THING!!!!!

victor809 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
A bit more complicated than that. The federal government has been on a massive ammo buying kick. I've seen numbers quoted in the billions. Not sure exactly what the number is but its massive. Nearly every government agency has outstanding orders for ammunition. So factories that would normally produce large varieties of ammo have been focusing on the government orders. Thus perhaps they have scaled back non-military varieties of ammunition. Add in the fact that there have been ammo shortages since shortly after Obama won the election due to his anti-gun rhetoric. This has led to ammunition flying off the shelf as fas as it is received at sales outlets. In some cases, people working at retail outlets hold back ammo to sell to family and friends. Not to mention people stocking up as soon as they see it on shelves due to shortages.

All this had created the "perfect storm" for ammo purchasing.


Mattie B wrote:
Victor the above is correct. I hate to cut and paste here. I promise you can easily find the correlation of ammo prices/availability to this administration.


I wouldn't steer you wrong buddy. I promise it's there.


Guys,
I have no doubt that ammo prices have gone up since Obama took office. If you look at the spin-up after his nomination in 08, and everyone's certainty that he was going to immediately confiscate all guns to become leader for life (I'm pretty sure that exact thread was posted on this forum in 2008)... then it's no surprise that prices would soar.

The question is whether this is because of anything he actually did, or if it's just because everyone is afraid of him.

Both of you are suggesting that he's manipulating ammunition prices through controlling the amount of ammunition purchased by government agencies (this is a pretty big stretch to begin with, because it suggests the president has the time or inclination to meddle with the budget of independent agencies, when there are probably much simpler ways to take your ammunition)... I believe you are referring to the purchases addressed in this link:
http://www.politifact.com/oregon/statements/2014/jun/27/james-buchal/government-stockpiling-hundreds-millions-rounds-am/

As you can see, while the infowars article jumped on the government ammunition purchase, that wasn't an unusual purchase, and in fact is lower than prior years. According to politifact, (here's the snopes article, but they didn't go back to previous years: http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/ssabullets.asp) it simply isn't likely that government purchases are what is driving the prices up and availability down. In fact, both articles suggest that it's the paranoia which is causing individual civilian purchases to drive down availability (as I suggested in a previous post, it's a run on ammunition).
Here's a "bearing arms" website providing a graph of said arms purchases by the government:
http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2014/02/17/breaking-dhs-is-not-buying-up-all-the-ammunition/

And interestingly enough, here's a wikipedia article which says almost everything I just said, but smarter:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%9313_United_States_ammunition_shortage

Abrignac Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
victor809 wrote:
Guys,
I have no doubt that ammo prices have gone up since Obama took office. If you look at the spin-up after his nomination in 08, and everyone's certainty that he was going to immediately confiscate all guns to become leader for life (I'm pretty sure that exact thread was posted on this forum in 2008)... then it's no surprise that prices would soar.

The question is whether this is because of anything he actually did, or if it's just because everyone is afraid of him.

Both of you are suggesting that he's manipulating ammunition prices through controlling the amount of ammunition purchased by government agencies (this is a pretty big stretch to begin with, because it suggests the president has the time or inclination to meddle with the budget of independent agencies, when there are probably much simpler ways to take your ammunition)... I believe you are referring to the purchases addressed in this link:
http://www.politifact.com/oregon/statements/2014/jun/27/james-buchal/government-stockpiling-hundreds-millions-rounds-am/

As you can see, while the infowars article jumped on the government ammunition purchase, that wasn't an unusual purchase, and in fact is lower than prior years. According to politifact, (here's the snopes article, but they didn't go back to previous years: http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/ssabullets.asp) it simply isn't likely that government purchases are what is driving the prices up and availability down. In fact, both articles suggest that it's the paranoia which is causing individual civilian purchases to drive down availability (as I suggested in a previous post, it's a run on ammunition).
Here's a "bearing arms" website providing a graph of said arms purchases by the government:
http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2014/02/17/breaking-dhs-is-not-buying-up-all-the-ammunition/

And interestingly enough, here's a wikipedia article which says almost everything I just said, but smarter:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%9313_United_States_ammunition_shortage



I never once mentioned anything regarding prices. Perhaps you should reread my post.

As far as fact checking is concerned, I prefer to seek out relavent documentation instead of relying someone else to provide me an *unbiased* version of the facts.

Over the years I have done the research, read the RFP's etc... The government has been buying larger quantities of ammo in this administration as opposed to previous ones. As far as whether or not I believe that Obama is micromanaging individual agency budgets I don't think for a minute he is. But, one need not micromanage said budgets to see that agencies do so. One simply needs to tell his cabinet members to have their agencies stockpile ammunition.
Mattie B Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Victor.

I know you like to play the symantics game


Think of the Cuban middle crisis.

Did the Russians "do" anything , or were people just scared of what could happen?

So in my mind, absolutely, Obama has caused issues in me procuring ammo.
DrafterX Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
the Cuban middle crisis... Think Think

doesn't ring a bell... Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,288
Mattie B wrote:
Victor.

I know you like to play the symantics game


Think of the Cuban middle crisis.

Did the Russians "do" anything , or were people just scared of what could happen?

So in my mind, absolutely, Obama has caused issues in me procuring ammo.




There were Russian nuke missiles in Cuba - why would anyone be afraid ?
victor809 Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
I never once mentioned anything regarding prices. Perhaps you should reread my post.

As far as fact checking is concerned, I prefer to seek out relavent documentation instead of relying someone else to provide me an *unbiased* version of the facts.

Over the years I have done the research, read the RFP's etc... The government has been buying larger quantities of ammo in this administration as opposed to previous ones. As far as whether or not I believe that Obama is micromanaging individual agency budgets I don't think for a minute he is. But, one need not micromanage said budgets to see that agencies do so. One simply needs to tell his cabinet members to have their agencies stockpile ammunition.


You're right, but you were talking availability, and Mattie was talking price and availabilty, I figured two birds, one stone... :)

But come on Anthony, if you've been doing research then you have data to provide us. A graph of RFPs for ammo per agency over the past 8 to 10 years, something like that. I'm gonna assume that the people putting together the above linked articles assembled the public data (RFPs are public) prior to writing their articles, and even providing a graph. If you're going to say they're wrong and you're right, you've got to provide some equivalent data.

And to follow on, what would Obama's purpose be to tell his cabinet members to stockpile ammunition? The general story running around when this scare started was so he could take over the government, quash riots and never step down from president. As it stands, there doesn't appear to be any likelihood he isn't going to step down on schedule... heck, he seems eager to get the heck out of the office. He never did anything that would induce riots... so tht didn't seem to be a reason. Unless you're suspecting that he's having government agencies buy a lot of ammo, specifically to ensure that there will be less for civilians... jsut because he doesn't want civilians to have ammo. That seems roundabout.

victor809 Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Mattie B wrote:
Victor.

I know you like to play the symantics game


Think of the Cuban middle crisis.

Did the Russians "do" anything , or were people just scared of what could happen?

So in my mind, absolutely, Obama has caused issues in me procuring ammo.


This isnt' semantics. You're now saying that the shortage of ammo and high prices is because everyone is afraid obama is going to take away their guns and ammo, and that's entirely his fault.

Except conveniently that fear was stoked by the same groups that will profit from runs on ammo and guns. Wouldn't you blame them for some of this? Obama has never successfully taken any ammo or guns away (to my knowledge, I'm sure you can correct me if I'm wrong)... he didn't enact any laws restricting guns.. he encouraged the idea, but wasn't successful.

There has been so much hype from the gun manufacturers, and apparently outright lies from fringe media that anyone owning a gun is buying ammo the instant they see it anywhere... they're all blaming obama, but it certainly seems from the information I can find that they're just on some weird perpetual motion machine of fear.
Stinkdyr Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Oblome and the Fed are doing great.....if you like inflation, tax and fee increases.

Beer
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>