America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by Covfireman. 84 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Fair and Balanced
tailgater Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
It's obvious the media is in the suit-pant pocket of the Hill Dog.
We get it.

But this whole issue with Trump and the Gold Star families?
The media is chasing down members of the GOP to get comments, and of course none of them are positive.

But where was this push from the media when Hillary did the same thing to the gold star mom of a soldier who died in Benghazi?

Compare the two:
A. Trump is an idiot who said stupid things.
B. Hillary is a greasy dirtbag who said stupid things.

But Hillary's comments are WORSE than Trumps. Trump didn't LIE to the parents. Trump wasn't involved in their son's death. Trump isn't calling the parents liars.

Both are despicable. I get that.
But bring it to a personal level:
If my kid died in service and somebody said the things Trump said, I'd be furious.
But if somebody else was a reason he died? And then lied to me? And then called me a liar when I call them out?

Perspective.

Neither side has any. But the left wear their ignorance like a badge of honor.

ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
🙈🙉🙊
banderl Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
tailgater wrote:
It's obvious the media is in the suit-pant pocket of the Hill Dog.
We get it.

But this whole issue with Trump and the Gold Star families?
The media is chasing down members of the GOP to get comments, and of course none of them are positive.

But where was this push from the media when Hillary did the same thing to the gold star mom of a soldier who died in Benghazi?

Compare the two:
A. Trump is an idiot who said stupid things.
B. Hillary is a greasy dirtbag who said stupid things.

But Hillary's comments are WORSE than Trumps. Trump didn't LIE to the parents. Trump wasn't involved in their son's death. Trump isn't calling the parents liars.

Both are despicable. I get that.
But bring it to a personal level:
If my kid died in service and somebody said the things Trump said, I'd be furious.
But if somebody else was a reason he died? And then lied to me? And then called me a liar when I call them out?

Perspective.

Neither side has any. But the left wear their ignorance like a badge of honor.




When did she do this?
victor809 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So This post actually made me go and look up what the "lying to families" thing is.

I'm not sure I'd call it worse.

I'm not sure we can establish that she knew the truth at that time.

And there are conflicting reports from the families as to what she even said.

Everyone hears what they want to hear.....
Speyside Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
We can debate all we want. The basic question is simple. Who do you think will be our best president. It is unfortunate that the 2 people with a realistic chance of winning and becoming president are not great choices.
victor809 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'm not thrilled by either. But there's little doubt that hillary would actually perform adequately as president, where trump would likely continue his 13 year old girl antics.
Gene363 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,838
tailgater wrote:
It's obvious the media is in the suit-pant pocket of the Hill Dog.
We get it.

But this whole issue with Trump and the Gold Star families?
The media is chasing down members of the GOP to get comments, and of course none of them are positive.

But where was this push from the media when Hillary did the same thing to the gold star mom of a soldier who died in Benghazi?

Compare the two:
A. Trump is an idiot who said stupid things.
B. Hillary is a greasy dirtbag who said stupid things.

But Hillary's comments are WORSE than Trumps. Trump didn't LIE to the parents. Trump wasn't involved in their son's death. Trump isn't calling the parents liars.

Both are despicable. I get that.
But bring it to a personal level:
If my kid died in service and somebody said the things Trump said, I'd be furious.
But if somebody else was a reason he died? And then lied to me? And then called me a liar when I call them out?

Perspective.

Neither side has any. But the left wear their ignorance like a badge of honor.



I would be too, however there is one big difference and god forbid any such event in your family, I doubt you would use your family tragedy to promote a politician of any ilk, much less base that promotion on a distortion of the what was said. A proposed moratorium on muslim immigrants, what Trump proposed as did Jimmy Carter implement(?) versus outright banning muslims and deporting them all.

Election hyperbole, SOP, unlike the past, Trump feeding it back 100x, the democrats are just not used to taking their own medicine. Republicans have almost always just rolled over wringed their hands when attacked. Like it or not, Trump is beating them at their own game. The voters are eating it up, but it's still disgusting. At least the democrats now know what it feels like to be on the receiving end for a change.

Victimhood: Personally, I do not feel victims or families of victims of a tragedy have some special insight as to what should or shouldn't be done to prevent the next one, a great example are the 911 families. They have every right to their opinion and their grief, but that doesn't magically imbue them with the knowledge to resolve such issues or to decide if anyone else has contributed. It also does not give them licence to say anything they please without taking the consequences for what they say.

Stinkdyr Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
victor809 wrote:
I'm not thrilled by either. But there's little doubt that hillary would actually perform adequately as president, where trump would likely continue his 13 year old girl antics.



The problem with her adequate Prezzi performance is that it will drain more $ and freedom out of my pocket.

Beer
Gene363 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,838

As to the title of this thread, Fair and Balanced, a Fox News slogan, does not apply to their coverage of Trump. I try my best to avoid the news, but I'm not the only person in my house. With a couple of exceptions, I get the distinct feeling most of Fox news personalities are not fans of Trump at all.

I know this will stress some of you out since you will in essence be agreeing with Fox News, but facts are facts. ram27bat
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Victor, she told her daughter and foreign leaders it was a terrorist attack. That's NOT what she told the families....
victor809 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Stinkdyr wrote:
The problem with her adequate Prezzi performance is that it will drain more $ and freedom out of my pocket.

Beer


Don't delude yourself for a second that won't happen with Trump.
Stinkdyr Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
victor809 wrote:
Don't delude yourself for a second that won't happen with Trump.



And now you know why I vote Libertarian.

Herfing
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
On the issue of the Benghazi terror strikes, Clinton denied telling family members of people killed in the Sept. 11, 2012, incident on a U.S. outpost in Benghazi, Libya, that the attack was sparked by an anti-Islam video and was not terrorism.

She instead suggested the family members misunderstood her because they were overwhelmed by grief.

“I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that,” Clinton said. “As other members of families who’ve lost loved ones have said, that's not what they heard. I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who, in that moment, may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said.”



Mellow
victor809 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
Victor, she told her daughter and foreign leaders it was a terrorist attack. That's NOT what she told the families....


According to politifact she gave the leaders and her daughter incorect information. She relayed that some random group who had claimed responsibility did it. That group then retracted the claim.

I can understand completely keeping that information from going to too many people until it's verified. Why would she tell them some group took responsibility if it isn't verified?

victor809 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
On the issue of the Benghazi terror strikes, Clinton denied telling family members of people killed in the Sept. 11, 2012, incident on a U.S. outpost in Benghazi, Libya, that the attack was sparked by an anti-Islam video and was not terrorism.

She instead suggested the family members misunderstood her because they were overwhelmed by grief.

“I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that,” Clinton said. “As other members of families who’ve lost loved ones have said, that's not what they heard. I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who, in that moment, may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said.”



Mellow


And how do you know she's lying about that?
victor809 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Seriously guys. This isn't hard to understand why the media is willing to report on one thing over the other.

Trump's words are on tape. He willingly repeats them and then re-tweets them. There is no ambiguity, the words are a fact.

Whatever you believe may have happened between hillary and the families of those killed in the benghazi attack, there is no evidence of what was said. The families don't all say the same thing even, and not all of them say they heard anything about a video. With this much unknown, why would the news cover it as a fact. It's the sort of thing that shows up in spin rags.
mikey1597 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Al Capone was convicted for tax evasion and not all the murders, muggings, extortion... he ordered or committed himself. He was a good liar too.
DrafterX Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
And how do you know she's lying about that?



She's Hillary... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Seriously guys. This isn't hard to understand why the media is willing to report on one thing over the other.

Trump's words are on tape. He willingly repeats them and then re-tweets them. There is no ambiguity, the words are a fact.

Whatever you believe may have happened between hillary and the families of those killed in the benghazi attack, there is no evidence of what was said. The families don't all say the same thing even, and not all of them say they heard anything about a video. With this much unknown, why would the news cover it as a fact. It's the sort of thing that shows up in spin rags.


Victor,
You and I don't always see eye to eye on the issues.
But you're not usually this for off base.

It's not JUST the gold-star family lies here.

It's everything.

You want lies on tape?
Watch the multitude of youtube videos showing Hillary lying about the emails, with the FBI director saying the complete opposite time and time again.


DrMaddVibe Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
victor809 wrote:
So This post actually made me go and look up what the "lying to families" thing is.

I'm not sure I'd call it worse.

I'm not sure we can establish that she knew the truth at that time.

And there are conflicting reports from the families as to what she even said.

Everyone hears what they want to hear.....



She had the State Department fabricate the whole You Tube video lie to hide the fact that they were NOT going to send in any military to help them. Despite the fact it was a CIA annex house where they sold weapons out the back door...and had guys on the ground with ruby red lighting up the place so a pinpoint air attack via drone or smart bomb would hit the direct target. Those planes...were turned away.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFf0dUH3OtU

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-secret-cia-mission-in-benghazi-2013-8

"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/01/bombshell-us-rescue-team-on-way-to-benghazi-turned-back-video/

Yeah...reconcile that any way you have to but...she just marginalized the lives of Americans. Americans that had families, loved ones and friends.
tailgater Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
DrafterX wrote:


“I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that,” Clinton said. “As other members of families who’ve lost loved ones have said, that's not what they heard. I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who, in that moment, may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said.”



Mellow



At least she forgives them for being liars...
tailgater Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
banderl wrote:
When did she do this?


Was this a serious question, or were you being ironic?

tailgater Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
So This post actually made me go and look up what the "lying to families" thing is.

I'm not sure I'd call it worse.

I'm not sure we can establish that she knew the truth at that time.

And there are conflicting reports from the families as to what she even said.

Everyone hears what they want to hear.....


I'm going backwards on my responses here, but your post proves my point.

Trump lies and it's front page.
Hillary lies and you get opposing forces trying to define how much she lied.

Maybe it was simply too much when she landed in Bosnia under sniper fire...wait. Oh, nevermind.

banderl Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
tailgater wrote:
Was this a serious question, or were you being ironic?




http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/18/checking-patricia-smiths-claims-about-clinton-and-/

What was said to the woman?
mikey1597 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
It depends on what the definition of "is" is.
victor809 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Victor,
You and I don't always see eye to eye on the issues.
But you're not usually this for off base.

It's not JUST the gold-star family lies here.

It's everything.

You want lies on tape?
Watch the multitude of youtube videos showing Hillary lying about the emails, with the FBI director saying the complete opposite time and time again.




We're not asking about the email thing here. I don't disagree with that one, she was incorrect when saying he said she didn't do anything wrong.

But in this thread we're asked to compare her interaction with the benghazi families with trump's interaction with the khan's. I think it's clear why there is more media attention on one.
victor809 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
She had the State Department fabricate the whole You Tube video lie to hide the fact that they were NOT going to send in any military to help them. Despite the fact it was a CIA annex house where they sold weapons out the back door...and had guys on the ground with ruby red lighting up the place so a pinpoint air attack via drone or smart bomb would hit the direct target. Those planes...were turned away.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFf0dUH3OtU

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-secret-cia-mission-in-benghazi-2013-8

"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/01/bombshell-us-rescue-team-on-way-to-benghazi-turned-back-video/

Yeah...reconcile that any way you have to but...she just marginalized the lives of Americans. Americans that had families, loved ones and friends.


I tend to agree with her here.

The important part of the story is "american dead". the important part isn't "because of riot due to video" or "because of planned attack". Either way americans are dead. If you think the important part is trying to parse whether a politician correctly identified the cause within the first 72 hours (there is plenty of time for analysis later)... then I'd say you've got your priorities wrong. But that's just me.
victor809 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I'm going backwards on my responses here, but your post proves my point.

Trump lies and it's front page.
Hillary lies and you get opposing forces trying to define how much she lied.

Maybe it was simply too much when she landed in Bosnia under sniper fire...wait. Oh, nevermind.



Again. You are presupposing that she lied, without any clear information. While I understand you don't like her, you can't possibly think that you are looking at this in an unbiased manner when the words you use are assuming she was wrong before you even think about the problem.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
victor809 wrote:
I tend to agree with her here.

The important part of the story is "american dead". the important part isn't "because of riot due to video" or "because of planned attack". Either way americans are dead. If you think the important part is trying to parse whether a politician correctly identified the cause within the first 72 hours (there is plenty of time for analysis later)... then I'd say you've got your priorities wrong. But that's just me.



The important part of the story is NOT "american dead". It's that the CIA were selling guns and holding hostages at an annex building. They attacked the place for over 8 hours. They smoked out a US ambassador of his safe room and killed him.

Then again, you tend to believe her lies.

I really thought you were smarter than that. Thanks for clearing that up. Your priorities are wrapped up in defending lies. Good luck with that, but then again...you're used to it. You're a useful idiot to a power elite that wipe their feet on your back.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/why-hillary-clinton-keeps-lying/493841/
ZRX1200 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
It's situational for him
Brewha Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
tailgater wrote:
It's obvious the media is in the suit-pant pocket of the Hill Dog.
We get it.

But this whole issue with Trump and the Gold Star families?
The media is chasing down members of the GOP to get comments, and of course none of them are positive.

But where was this push from the media when Hillary did the same thing to the gold star mom of a soldier who died in Benghazi?

Compare the two:
A. Trump is an idiot who said stupid things.
B. Hillary is a greasy dirtbag who said stupid things.

But Hillary's comments are WORSE than Trumps. Trump didn't LIE to the parents. Trump wasn't involved in their son's death. Trump isn't calling the parents liars.

Both are despicable. I get that.
But bring it to a personal level:
If my kid died in service and somebody said the things Trump said, I'd be furious.
But if somebody else was a reason he died? And then lied to me? And then called me a liar when I call them out?

Perspective.

Neither side has any. But the left wear their ignorance like a badge of honor.



I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Brewha wrote:
I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.



Yes...but of course...because Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats can offer...yes...it's all so there and blatant.



Gimmie a break...she's as bad if not worse than him! Why you can substitute Hillary in your last post and it's EXACTLY the same!
Brewha Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Yes...but of course...because Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats can offer...yes...it's all so there and blatant.



Gimmie a break...she's as bad if not worse than him! Why you can substitute Hillary in your last post and it's EXACTLY the same!

Well, it seems that Democrats, even Sanders supporters, are firmly behind Clinton. Trump has the most splintered of parties - even his own peeps won't endorse him.

Clinton's foreign policies are (today) a continuation of Obama's - that are well received and respected. Trump, while he really has no cogent policy - has gained disrespect from many nations, that he truly earned.

So no - not the same - not even close - diametrically opposed in fact.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Brewha wrote:
Well, it seems that Democrats, even Sanders supporters, are firmly behind Clinton. Trump has the most splintered of parties - even his own peeps won't endorse him.

Clinton's foreign policies are (today) a continuation of Obama's - that are well received and respected. Trump, while he really has no cogent policy - has gained disrespect from many nations, that he truly earned.

So no - not the same - not even close - diametrically opposed in fact.



Keep on believing that. In all the people I know and meet that voted for Sanders...NOT ONE is voting for that bitch.

Clinton's foreign policies are a joke and Putin will stomp a mudhole in her ass and walk it dry...the Chinese and Iranians are right behind too. I predict we will flee the entire Middle East with our tails between our legs akin to what happened in Saigon in the final days of the Vietnam Conflict, but that's just me.

As far as Trump goes...seriously? Who cares. I don't. You're no expert on the guy. You're just buying the steak for the sizzle. Now, Clinton? EVERYONE KNOWS what kind of a lying, scumbag, elitist carpetbagging quid pro quo machine she is.

I will seriously miss the Kenyan King...next to these two it's only way to make him appear Presidential. Jimmy Carter will live to laugh now.
TMCTLT Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Brewha wrote:
I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.




Yeah...and yet the Obama supporters voted for him twice because he was an " eloquent speaker " he had No endearing qualities or foreign policy experience, in a nutshell you voted for a Community Organizer and your making fun of Trump and his supporters???..... you guys don't require much @ all from your POTUS do ya's ?
Brewha Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Keep on believing that. In all the people I know and meet that voted for Sanders...NOT ONE is voting for that bitch.

Clinton's foreign policies are a joke and Putin will stomp a mudhole in her ass and walk it dry...the Chinese and Iranians are right behind too. I predict we will flee the entire Middle East with our tails between our legs akin to what happened in Saigon in the final days of the Vietnam Conflict, but that's just me.

As far as Trump goes...seriously? Who cares. I don't. You're no expert on the guy. You're just buying the steak for the sizzle. Now, Clinton? EVERYONE KNOWS what kind of a lying, scumbag, elitist carpetbagging quid pro quo machine she is.

I will seriously miss the Kenyan King...next to these two it's only way to make him appear Presidential. Jimmy Carter will live to laugh now.

To be honest Dr. M. The only thing I actually agree with in your post is that you will seriously miss Obama.

The rest of it - no so much.....

But I will call you out on one thing:
"Carpetbagger"?

Wow. - you can really cross the line.....
Brewha Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
TMCTLT wrote:
Yeah...and yet the Obama supporters voted for him twice because he was an " eloquent speaker " he had No endearing qualities or foreign policy experience, in a nutshell you voted for a Community Organizer and your making fun of Trump and his supporters???..... you guys don't require much @ all from your POTUS do ya's ?

It was not eloquence alone. Some us us also understood both the words and the ideas.

But, any practical measure - he ase been the best president in our time.
Don't you think?
mikey1597 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
nope
Speyside Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Brewha, so your good with lying, scumbag, elitist?
Brewha Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
mikey1597 wrote:
nope

You're just trying to hurt my feeling, arn't you Mikey....
Brewha Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Speyside wrote:
Brewha, so your good with lying, scumbag, elitist?

I think I made it clear that I would not vote for Trump.
mikey1597 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Brewha wrote:
You're just trying to hurt my feeling, arn't you Mikey....



nope, my opinion
Brewha Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
mikey1597 wrote:
nope, my opinion

But I remember when we had beers in Dallas, and you told me of you respect for him - not just as a president or a Democrate, but as a man.
A strong, tall, muscular black man......



... Or maybe Drafter said that ....
TMCTLT Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Brewha wrote:
It was not eloquence alone. Some us us also understood both the words and the ideas.

But, any practical measure - he ase been the best president in our time.
Don't you think?





It'a a shame you have to consistently insult others intelligence in order to defend your own biases...

Again....you couldn't have possibly said that with a straight face....
mikey1597 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Brewha wrote:
But I remember when we had beers in Dallas, and you told me of you respect for him - not just as a president or a Democrate, but as a man.
A strong, tall, muscular black man......



... Or maybe Drafter said that ....



Ha Ha Ha, what kind of drugs were you on that night?

Next herf I'll remind you what I said, they wont let me post it here on the boards.
Brewha Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
mikey1597 wrote:
Ha Ha Ha, what kind of drugs were you on that night?

Next herf I'll remind you what I said, they wont let me post it here on the boards.

Steroid if I recall - I was fighting off the last of a chest infection......
Ah - good times.

Don't worry about Drafter - I could never shake his love for Obama.
Not that he has a lot of it....

Brewha Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
TMCTLT wrote:
[/color]



It'a a shame you have to consistently insult others intelligence in order to defend your own biases...

Again....you couldn't have possibly said that with a straight face....

Now if you would bother to look, I did not insult Mikey - who disagreed with my "biases". So much for the consistency theory.

I'll have you know I take great pride giving a few hopefully well crafted insults - playful and not. But when they are only dispensed when earned - I mean that's only good manners. Or, manners of some kind anyway.

I did in fact have a smirk on my face when I wrote it. Not because I didn't believe it, but rather the audience I wrote in in front of. Why, you would not believe how polarized and hateful some people can be on this forum.....

Would you?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Brewha wrote:
To be honest Dr. M. The only thing I actually agree with in your post is that you will seriously miss Obama.

The rest of it - no so much.....

But I will call you out on one thing:
"Carpetbagger"?

Wow. - you can really cross the line.....



Full Definition of carpetbagger
1
: a Northerner in the South after the American Civil War usually seeking private gain under the reconstruction governments
2
: outsider; especially : a nonresident or new resident who seeks private gain from an area often by meddling in its business or politics
victor809 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
The important part of the story is NOT "american dead". It's that the CIA were selling guns and holding hostages at an annex building. They attacked the place for over 8 hours. They smoked out a US ambassador of his safe room and killed him.

Then again, you tend to believe her lies.

I really thought you were smarter than that. Thanks for clearing that up. Your priorities are wrapped up in defending lies. Good luck with that, but then again...you're used to it. You're a useful idiot to a power elite that wipe their feet on your back.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/why-hillary-clinton-keeps-lying/493841/


You conflate "believing" or "defending" lies with being interested in evidence over predisposed dislike for her.

If your biggest concern is whether a dead american's family was told they were killed by a riot or a premeditated attack within the first 72 hours (when we know they were eventually given the accurate information), then perhaps she's done a great job.

I mean seriously... the way the republicans talk she's the devil incarnate. And the best she's managed to do is that? I think you should expect a bit more in your evil incarnate.

I didn't even want the dems to nominate her... but I'm pretty unimpressed with the scandal everyone wants to try to bring her down on.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
victor809 wrote:
You conflate "believing" or "defending" lies with being interested in evidence over predisposed dislike for her.

If your biggest concern is whether a dead american's family was told they were killed by a riot or a premeditated attack within the first 72 hours (when we know they were eventually given the accurate information), then perhaps she's done a great job.

I mean seriously... the way the republicans talk she's the devil incarnate. And the best she's managed to do is that? I think you should expect a bit more in your evil incarnate.

I didn't even want the dems to nominate her... but I'm pretty unimpressed with the scandal everyone wants to try to bring her down on.



Yet she quotes her time as Secretary of State as being some crowning achievement. I don't know who's worse in that job...her or JOhnKErry!


And now this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GdLClHAMB0
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>