Speyside wrote:Tail, you really are a moron. Here is what the Russians did to effect the elections. I will use little words and simple concepts so there is a miniscule chance so you can understand it.
The indictment mentions that the Russian accounts were meant to embed with and emulate “radical” groups. The content was not designed to persuade people to change their views, but to harden those views. Confirmation bias is powerful and commonly employed in these kinds of psychological operations (a related Soviet concept is “reflexive control”—applying pressure in ways to elicit a specific, known response). The intention of these campaigns was to activate—or suppress—target groups. Not to change their views, but to change their behavior.
This is how the GRU effected the elections. Do you need this in picture form. I look forward to your simplistic response. You prolly will continue to mention hate, lies, and lack of evidence. Even though I have not lied and presented you with plausible evidence. I hate Trump, many people do. Now it's probably time for you to whatever Trump lunatics do.
How can I not mention hate when you are absolutely are dripping with it?
You can't start a statement with "you really are a moron" and then cry about being accused of being hateful. that's not how it works in real life. Or on a cigar forum.
As for your drivel above?
Please tell us the net effect.
You can't state that something is effected and call it fact without some means of measuring the effect.
Is it 80%?
was it 2 votes?
Did it decrease voter turnout or increase it?
Or did it just solidify the beliefs already ingrained in each sides base?
You like to invent your own facts willy nilly and then get mad at me for asking for details.
Remember, I'm not telling you that you're wrong. I merely asked for you to tell us what the net effect was.
The WHAT. not the HOW.
Drop the anger and the hate and maybe you'll see that you're mad at me for literally just asking you to quantify your statement that was presented as a fact.