America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by tailgater. 71 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Bad week for republicans
Robby Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-30-2002
Posts: 5,067
John, an artful dodge, but you did not answer my question. Was it not clear?
jdrabinski Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 794
Robby,

I didn't actually intend to dodge. I thought my response made sense. Clarify? Then I'll answer.

John
Robby Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-30-2002
Posts: 5,067
John, did you see any of the footage of the Kurds that were gassed en-masse? Women and children lying bloated on the ground rotting in the midday sun? The USE of these weapons against his own people is documented. The USE of these weapons against Iran is documented. Therefore, given the known production, existence, ownership, and use of WMD, my questions stands, "what do you think happened to them?" Not what does Hans or Frans think happened, what do you think happened to them?
usahog Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
I'll give you a hint John... Saddam didn't sneak them out through IRAN.. you can rule that Country out.. because he'd a Had them right back in his Lap as I stated in another Post... only they would have been Live!!!!!! ohhhh here's another Hint.. we the USA lit up tons of the **** by Mistake in Gulf War 1 after the War ended and it Effected 160,000 of our own people with whats known as Gulf War Syndrom... Course no body gives a rats as about those FACTS now do they?

Hog
jdrabinski Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 794
Robby,

Are you suggesting that we went to war as revenge for gassing the Kurds? That's a very new one to me.

I suspect the weapons have been sold and destroyed. All the evidence is that they no longer exist. To claim otherwise is to fly in the face of existing evidence and blindly support a widely discredited administration position.

Sure, of course they did exist. Years of sanctions and inspections led to their destruction and the end of their production. Deny this all you want, but there is no evidence of any other position.

usahog,

By invoking GWS, you are going back a dozen years for justification for this war. And, again, THAT WAS NOT the reason for going to war. I suspect depleted uranium is to blame for GWS, which would better explain the culture of denial in the military about this syndrom. I'm on the victims' side on this one, hog, so we probably agree that MUCH more needs to be done...and heads need to roll for it taking so long.

John
usahog Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
"and heads need to roll for it taking so long."

Good John... that means you'll vote your Consious in 2004... because the first head I'd like to see is Clintons... but he is gone... and now how many members on the Arm's senete committie are there??? it took them virtually 12 long years almost to let loose... because of so much Pressure from the VA and other Organisations to get to the Facts of whats going on with our Veterans...Take a Real look at whose Cutting into the Veterans Budget.. I posted the link in one of the Threads... Rickamavan said he would save it and view it later... I haven't heard back from him...
bottom line... the Senate Folks you and I elected... really don't want WMD's to be to much exposure because there's way to much Cost involved in the long run!!!!
It's time to get back to We the people for the people.. and let these so called do gooders Retire!!!!

Hog
billyjackson Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 08-19-2002
Posts: 2,860
Sweet Bleeding Jesus....

I sure am glad that no one here (myself included) has any direct decision making power or influence over those who do. (For the love of God, don't give me a representitive democracy lesson...I know we can vote and you know that's not what I mean.)

Or maybe the decision makers should be as hellfire sure of themselves of the RIGHT and GOOD thing to do in any situation like both sides of these kinds of threads tend to be.

But as usual...what the hell do I know?
usahog Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Well Billy... thats what they get paid for... and thats why we sent the to Washington... to represent the peoples best Interest... not to Profit from and for themselves!!!!

Hog
donutboy2000 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 11-20-2001
Posts: 25,000
Yankees win!!!!
Robby Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 10-30-2002
Posts: 5,067
Professor!? And I use that term loosely...

"I suspect the weapons have been sold and destroyed."

So when I say, we know he had them, and what do you think happen to them? You truly in your heart of hearts believe? That a megalomaniac like Sadam who was hell bent on domination of at the very least his neighbors in the middle east, and arguably the region and attacks against us and our interest "sold and destroyed" all of the weapons of mass destruction he worked so hard to obtain? Do you REALLY believe this? Are you really educated as you claim?

If you’re truly intelligent, you can’t POSSIBLY “truly” believe this? It is more of a statement in keeping with your political views (if you’re truly intelligent).
tailgater Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
So let me get this straight.

The professor said there was never any WOMD in Iraq.
Then he said there once was some.
But they were only used on the Kurds.
And the UN sanctions solved this potential crisis because Sadam wisely destroyed them all like he was supposed to.
But he kept no clear records and/or proof of the destruction.
Even though the ONLY reason they would destroy them would be to satisfy the UN and US.
And then he kept up the appearence of actually having the same weapons he destroyed.
And he did this.....WHY?
So the US would destroy him and his power?

huh?
Robby Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-30-2002
Posts: 5,067
Zackly… But you’re just not educated enough to understand it fully, and neither am I…
jdrabinski Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 794
Never said there were never...I assumed we were talking about now, before the war in the build up.

Yes, I believe that weapons inspections and destruction that took place (yes, it happened...the UN has been there for a dozen years). What evidence is there for your position? None. Simply put, no evidence. Why do you doubt Blix? He was the man in charge. Read what he said recently. Why doubt him?

You guys are obsessed with my education. Give it a rest already. I like debating these issues and all that, but the personal stuff is pretty tiring. Just stick to the topic, ok?

John
Robby Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 10-30-2002
Posts: 5,067
Blitz is a dunderhead obsessed with obfuscating his own failure. And yes, the UN, august body that they are has been there for 10 years... What have they accomplished??

Take me and show me all of your WMD or we’ll, we’ll, we’ll ummmmm, ahhhhh ummmmm, JUST TAKE US AND SHOW US OK!!??

Yeauper, that would put the fear of God in me for sure… So if I take a salt shaker and hide in “somewhere” in your local mall, and you go in and start looking for it, but all the people in the mall work for me and know that I don’t want you to find the salt shaker, and you must be “assisted” by my myrmidons, do you think you could find the salt shaker in a year? In 10? In a hundred? No way in hell would you ever find it.

Then exiting the mall after years of research, you could proclaim with pride and authority that you had done your job and that there was perhaps a salt shaker there years ago, but surely I’ve destroyed it because you can’t find any proof that it exists. This is what you're trying to convince us has happened.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. At night I can’t see the sun, but I know it’s still there…
DrMaddVibe Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
BUT, will the sun come out tomorrow? I stay up real late just to see if it will. I think it's like the fridge light. Is it on all the time or just when I open the door? How do I know? Do I want to know? Are there others that want to know or care?

What about breathing? Ever stop to think about that? I mean what if I stop. Can you make the body stop? What make it continue? Would abortion be called murder then?

As for the WOMD. He has them. Until we can get a little cooperation from the powers that be(or were!) in that country. Everyday citizens are starting to open up and tell soldiers about this and that Kay was on the news talking about this. Until the people of Iraq see that Saddam will be joining his sons, they fear retribution. Imagine living under the tyranny those people had to endure. Where do you put YOUR trust? I can only answer for myself, and know what I'd do, but these people behead people for assisting the "Great Satan".
Charlie Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Hell John, (Professor) the ACLU said the minority voters were not smart enough to use the machines in LA and lost in court! Maybe they agree with Rush on something?

Charlie
usahog Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

Exerpt; STATEMENT BY DAVID KAY ON THE INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE IRAQ SURVEY GROUP (ISG)
BEFORE THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE, AND THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
October 2, 2003


Let me turn now to chemical weapons (CW). In searching for retained stocks of chemical munitions, ISG has had to contend with the almost unbelievable scale of Iraq's conventional weapons armory, which dwarfs by orders of magnitude the physical size of any conceivable stock of chemical weapons. For example, there are approximately 130 known Iraqi Ammunition Storage Points (ASP), many of which exceed 50 square miles in size and hold an estimated 600,000 tons of artillery shells, rockets, aviation bombs and other ordinance. Of these 130 ASPs, approximately 120 still remain unexamined. As Iraqi practice was not to mark much of their chemical ordinance and to store it at the same ASPs that held conventional rounds, the size of the required search effort is enormous.

How long do you think it would take to clear out a warehouse 50 square miles in size, and at the same time be wearing gear to protect yourself from possible wmd's exposure, Plus working around 600,000 tons of other known Explosives?? they've only completed 10 of the 130 complexes so far!!! and the above link will show whats been found so far...

Enjoy!!!!
Hog
usahog Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
the above post was for John and the Others

"--No weapons of mass destruction. Still. Still. Still."

How Long would it take John???

Hog

jmvfrva Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 05-22-2003
Posts: 53
It's very simple for me.

When it comes to Democrats, I reject them.

It's very easy to do and it makes you feel good.
tailgater Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Professor,
It wasn't I who bragged about some statistic regarding my field of endeavor and reading comprehension.

But either way I'm just bustin your chops. Didn't mean to offend so I'll appologize now.

E-Chick Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2002
Posts: 4,877
Saw a bumper sticker this weekend...

"Kill babies. Save whales.
Raise taxes. Vote Democratic"

Marla
tailgater Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Just one more in a long list of reasons that you are indeed a perfect "10"

If I were a band member of Spinal Tap, you'd be an "11"...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12