FuzzNJ wrote:Yes, patriot act too. I am still against that also. Bush taking away Habeous Corpus, bad.
I believe I did say I was against the war in Iraq, and I did 'rail about it', and 'against a sitting president'. I see the latter being done daily here.
Bush did NOT have it right. He invaded a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 and diverted resources that should have been used to get the terrorists. 10's of thousands, and probably 100's of thousands of people died. 10's of thousands of our men and women are injured for life, over 4 thousand killed for that diversion. I did not change my mind about any of it, none, zero, zilch. Understand?
There are not enough differences between Obama and Bush for my liking, but there are many.
And...there...we...go. Fuzz is back to his liberal idiocy. How may posts that it finally take?
The reason why Habeous Corpus does not exist so that we can continue to interrogate people like KSM without continuious legal intervention from idiot liberal saps like yourself. KSM is not a legitimate enemy combatant under the Geneva Convention, he is not a US citizen. He is essential a walking side of beef. He has no rights.
Just like waterboarding is OK, which we now are finding out got us started down the path to killing Osama bin Laden.
Bush had it 100% correct.
However, you revel in the death of a man, but condemn the people and the methods that facilitated his assassination. And now you want to join in on the festivities?
If you had any principles whatsoever, you'd be OUTRAGED that the man was not given a trial, allowed to defend himself, or even be granted a lawyer. After all, you've been the one spouting all of this "we're better than that" crap when it came to Gitmo, interrogations, and all of your inane BS.
At the very least, you'd garner more respect by sticking to your alleged principles. However, you've now made it real clear that you've never had any in the first place.
The fact is, I have more respect for a guy like Rickamaven - who voted for Idi Amin Jr., and then was outraged when he got Bush Redux - because he's actually fairly consistent. He may be a loon, but he's consistent with his beliefs. He may be wrong, but he sticks to his guns for the most part.
You, on the other hand, are such an attention-craving little child, you'll throw what you claim to believe overboard, just so you can either claim some laughable sort of victory, or join in on the festivities.
In short: you're nothing more than a political hack. Your principles are a joke. Everything you claim to believe in is a lie.
At least the rest of us were consistant. Terrorists are little more than spies. The don't have the rights of enemy combatants, and they are not citizens of the US. If apprehended, they have the rights of a sirloin steak. You can "torture" them, hold them indefinately, and blow their head off if you can get a SEAL team in to do so. End of discussion.
So spare us all of your intellectual gymnastics (which assumes you have enough brain cells for it to be qualified as actual intellectual activity). We pretty much see you for what you are: a fraud.