Joined: 06-28-2006 Posts: 13,000
|
DrMaddVibe wrote:Your opinion must hold for the opposite of this statement...
That's a problem. I consider myself to be a Conservative. It's not government's place to create a job for ANYONE! That's why I asked for you to point out where in the documents does it say it's government's role to create jobs? A government that gives you a payday is a government that's stealing from somewhere to do it! Yes...STEALING! We're supposed to be operating under a budget...and we're not. There's never been a surplus. Your weakass attempt to show there ever was was blown out of the water as being a projection. It was a vapor on paper that never materialized...ever. Now you're stating that CRA and our own government sat around and were victimized? Nope.
As far as your President statement, I'd buy into that one too but not with the current pRESIDENT. He's a pox. His lobbyists rammed down another round of bailouts, stiffled us with (what should be un-Constitutional!) Obamacare that we cannot even fund, entered us into yet another war and continues to rack the debt with more and more. He does have an effect on the economy. NOBODY is going to invest in America with this guy behind the wheel. They're marking time and will wait this guy out of office. Economists everywhere loathe what he's doing and despite their best efforts to notify the White House that the rocks on the shore are dead up ahead...he's not listening. There are scads of them out there that say he's exactly what I'm saying...he's a pox on America!
Obama is a fine, very impressive person. He really is. Unfortunately, everything that he is doing in economics is exactly wrong. He is a crappy president,” Laffer said.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35341
“I think the White House has this completely wrong,” Moore said. “The Republicans are saying we are not going to let you have the increase in the debt until you get this spending under control.”
“If Republicans fold on this one, which I don’t think they are going to do, but if they blink first . . . that’s what put America at risk of a financial crisis and a potential run on the dollar and a run on U.S. bonds.”
Moore said he approves of Republican House Speaker John Boehner’s call to cut spending by every dollar the debt limit is raised. “That’s a good way of framing the issue,” he said, adding, “The real question is, how much is Obama willing to cut the budget?”
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/obama-debt-ceiling-/2011/06/04/id/398832
However, economists' main criticism of the Obama team centered on delays in enacting key parts of plans to rescue banks. "They overpromised and underdelivered," said Stephen Stanley of RBS Greenwich Capital. "Secretary Geithner scheduled a big speech and came out with just a vague blueprint. The uncertainty is hanging over everyone's head."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123671107124286261.html
I can keep going with this if you REALLY need more examples. The only economists that do approve of Owebama's Presidency are the ones making his policy and attending the State dinners.
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/michelle-malkin-hannity-1
LOL!!!
Pointed out that time and time again...FAILURE from the Economic front that promised they'd be transparent...look at them. Eat the Hannity/Malkin lovefest...POW! Nailed to the floor with their OpEd from FoxNews. You have to hear about weiner first though!
Strawman?
Please...come to the table with something of real tangible fact..not some "If" "And" or "But" defending this stooge. There is no way in Hell you can post the drivel on here defending this guy when you , Rick and any other water carrier railed (and STILL do!!!!) on GW Bush for 8 years. Oh, he was the worst we heard. He's stupid we heard. Now with Hope and Change in front of our steaming eyes we see the sheer failure and incompetence the magnitude that Keystone Cops episodes were written around! There is not one single thing this guy has done that erases 3 I can think of!
Talk about a strawman...Hope and Change. The opposite does not have to be true, it could be something similar or a little of this and a little of that. Secondly, it is a straw man because you are attributing positions to me and demanding I defend them even though I have not stated that they are my positions. And you keep doing it.
|