ZRX1200 wrote:Robert you really feel Barry was vetted?
Seriously?
ZRX1200 wrote:Dunno still waiting for an answer.
He willingly mocks my simple question without answering it.
So currently he's still balls deep.
Why do you think I mock you? I don't even get where you are coming from with your question!
But, just to stay out of the cross-hairs of your paranoia:
I believe he was properly "vetted" as to place of birth. Hawaii's state record indicates he was born there. That, to me, is prima facia evidence. I take it to be true unless proven greater weighted evidence otherwise.
Could Hawaii be wrong? Sure, but I doubt it is. Is there some vast cover-up strategy? I doubt it, but sure, there could be.
Want to convince me he was not born within the constitutional the geographical requirement? Then, show me evidence direct evidence on-par with his Hawaii state issued birth record/certificate.
All the other evidence I have ever heard or seen is merely circumstantial and, even when stacked up, doesn't overcome the presumption that Hawaii's record(s) are accurate.
I really don't think enough people really buy into the allegation anymore where it makes sense to keep dancing to it between now and the election. If you want Obama gone, your time would be better spent convincing Independents and Undecideds to vote for Romney. After that, people could go back after Obama on this issue for the rest of their or his lives.
Still think I am mocking you???