America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by Buckwheat. 94 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
BIDEN DOES IT AGAIN-Declares Government Regulates Guns
jackconrad Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Dogs Wife earns him da Pass !

tegulator Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
dpnewell wrote:
Typical liberal smoke screen. Read the Federalist Papers and then tell me we have no idea of what their intent was.


Hmmmm...I've never heard of these "Federalist Papers" which, I assume, were the collective opinions of every person who signed the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and all the state legislatures which ratified the latter. I forgot that "the Founders" were all in unanimous agreement on every single issue and all wanted to go to war with Britain, and that no competing political factions emerged after we successfully revolted.

DrMaddVibe wrote:
Yeah...so let's not read what they wrote...let's just let lawyers and lobbyists write legislation and do whatever...yeah...it's worked wonders.

Look at the mess they created.

A far cry from the "experiment" they created.


I also apparently forgot that dichotomies were the only way to view the world. Let's cherry-pick the gun control issue. Let's forget about slavery, women's rights, church/state separation, or the ability to question the government. The Founders were clearly right to put off those discussions because their decisions were and are completely perfect and perfectly applicable in the Digital Age in every way, shape, and form. Jefferson was both correct and wrong, which still makes him correct, when he said "God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion." We should take stands in any modern discussions based on the presumed opinions (which we somehow have complete certainty on) of a bunch of rich, white, men who died 150 years ago.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
I also apparently forgot that dichotomies were the only way to view the world. Let's cherry-pick the gun control issue. Let's forget about slavery, women's rights, church/state separation, or the ability to question the government. The Founders were clearly right to put off those discussions because their decisions were and are completely perfect and perfectly applicable in the Digital Age in every way, shape, and form. Jefferson was both correct and wrong, which still makes him correct, when he said "God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion." We should take stands in any modern discussions based on the presumed opinions (which we somehow have complete certainty on) of a bunch of rich, white, men who died 150 years ago.



The Federalist Papers are what they used to communicate to every citizen (see they didn't have American Idol back then) because they valued reading and wanted to know what we were fighting for! Educate yourself.

That bunch of rich, white men...many of whom lost loved ones...fortunes...created a document that many regard as the finest ever created as a basis for a government...so an idiot such as yourself could proclaim aburdities about it being an open ended document to change with the nation. They enabled that function because they were wise enough to see that it's not perfect. They also made it difficult to change for that reason!

Thanks for showing all the board how you cannot grasp that.


Why how would we have such a rebellion every 20 years if we didn't have the ability with the same weapons as the government we're supposed to overthrow?Think


Yeah.
tegulator Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
The Federalist Papers are what they used to communicate to every citizen (see they didn't have American Idol back then) because they valued reading and wanted to know what we were fighting for! Educate yourself.

That bunch of rich, white men...many of whom lost loved ones...fortunes...created a document that many regard as the finest ever created as a basis for a government...so an idiot such as yourself could proclaim aburdities about it being an open ended document to change with the nation. They enabled that function because they were wise enough to see that it's not perfect. They also made it difficult to change for that reason!

Thanks for showing all the board how you cannot grasp that.


Why how would we have such a rebellion every 20 years if we didn't have the ability with the same weapons as the government we're supposed to overthrow?Think


Yeah.


Ah, how quickly we descend into ad hominems. The Federalist Papers were written by three men (Hamilton, Madison, and Jay) urging people to support the newly-drafted Constitution, despite the best efforts of the Anti-federalists/Democratic-Republicans. This was long after the American Revolution, so there was no "fighting" going on...apart from the endless bickering over how states should pay off their Revolutionary War debt (unless you want to argue Shays' Rebellion). You're also fooling yourself if you think the literacy rate was high enough for this to be a democratizing effort, because there wasn't anything approaching universal white male suffrage until the Jackson administration (at the earliest).

Many of those who lost fortunes and loved ones were only able to sustain them because of slave labor. No one ever said the document was perfect.

DrMaddVibe Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Ah, how quickly we descend into ad hominems. The Federalist Papers were written by three men (Hamilton, Madison, and Jay) urging people to support the newly-drafted Constitution, despite the best efforts of the Anti-federalists/Democratic-Republicans. This was long after the American Revolution, so there was no "fighting" going on...apart from the endless bickering over how states should pay off their Revolutionary War debt (unless you want to argue Shays' Rebellion). You're also fooling yourself if you think the literacy rate was high enough for this to be a democratizing effort, because there wasn't anything approaching universal white male suffrage until the Jackson administration (at the earliest).

Many of those who lost fortunes and loved ones were only able to sustain them because of slave labor. No one ever said the document was perfect.





So, your selective memory only goes so far...got it.

Yes, there was a LOT of fighting going on, but I digress you are the big Constitutional "expert"...those "ignant" citizens wanted the 411...as to what was going on in the Congress...why it was taking so long. All you can do is bring the "debt" to the table?

You dare mention "cherry picking"?

Please.
tegulator Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Most of those "ignant" citizens weren't able to vote (as many people in here wouldn't be able to either). They weren't educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves. Thanks for helping me make my point. I fail to see any "selective memory" here. But continue on...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Most of those "ignant" citizens weren't able to vote (as many people in here wouldn't be able to either). They weren't educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves. Thanks for helping me make my point. I fail to see any "selective memory" here. But continue on...



I'd be willing to state that there were more voracious and competent readers say in the states of MA, NY and VA COMBINED back then than there are now in present day Wayne county Michigan! Could everyone attend college back then? No. At least back then they would go into the "family" business, pioneer or some other...wait...I know...they were scalped that's it...scalped or plagued with disease. Scalped, plagues and famine. Maybe not in that order, but The Man did it to them and they're responsible. I shudder to think what a man like Thomas Jefferson would do with the Information Superhighway. A tour of Monticello shows the visitor what the man did with the tools at his disposal, oh wait...you're going to say the slaves did it all aren't you? Yes, the slavemaster Jefferson whipped them until he flayed the skin off their bones...yes he did...that's ALL he did...and in his spare time he crafted the Constitution. Why the crafty ol' Devil hisself...whatever. Seen your type trying to take the same stance in the classrooms. That dog don't hunt. What you have is the government and the history we ALL share. It's not pretty. There were wrongs committed and it took better men than Jefferson to right them; however they did it under the same government he helped create. The blood this nation has shed to right the wrongs would fill an ocean, but you're expecting more? Is this nation so evil that you cannot live here anymore or are you the agent of change a divine entity divulged the wrongs and you're going to right them all? The aborted babies? Climate change? Over-population? Famine? Peace? What wrong did you forget because you're stuck with the "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" types. You're forgetting it is an open ended process that this Grand Experiment really is.

The people read more then they do now. They didn't have tv...radio...telegraph...telephones...they had newspapers. It took days and weeks to reach the people. In most cases they'd read the entire thing front to back multiple times. You choose to make this some racial bender by interjecting the quote above. The ONLY point you made is that you want to racebait like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson!

Then again, after reading The Federalist Papers...link provided, you're welcome...

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html

You'd be able to deduce that you don't have to be a rocket surgeon to figure it all out. It's cliff note format is pretty basic. STILL can't figure it out? Well, back then you were encouraged to engage in conversation. Unless you're yoked by the neck and aren't "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" ignant. You're stuck in the mud with the "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" not willing to do anything for yourself. C'mon...you're better than that...aren't you?
tegulator Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I'd be willing to state that there were more voracious and competent readers say in the states of MA, NY and VA COMBINED back then than there are now in present day Wayne county Michigan!


This point is neither falsifiable nor interesting.

DrMaddVibe wrote:
A tour of Monticello shows the visitor what the man did with the tools at his disposal, oh wait...you're going to say the slaves did it all aren't you? Yes, the slavemaster Jefferson whipped them until he flayed the skin off their bones...yes he did...that's ALL he did...and in his spare time he crafted the Constitution. Why the crafty ol' Devil hisself...whatever.


Jefferson didn't whip his slaves. He had other people do it for him and couldn't bear to be around while they were whipped. Oh, and Jefferson was in France during the Constitutional Convention. And you said *I* am the one that needs to be educated...

DrMaddVibe wrote:
Seen your type trying to take the same stance in the classrooms. That dog don't hunt.


I don't teach animals, I teach undergraduates...although there are a few similarities. Let's see how quickly charges of "Marxism," "liberal-elitism," or "corrupting our nation's youth" come to play.

DrMaddVibe wrote:
What you have is the government and the history we ALL share. It's not pretty. There were wrongs committed and it took better men than Jefferson to right them; however they did it under the same government he helped create. The blood this nation has shed to right the wrongs would fill an ocean, but you're expecting more? Is this nation so evil that you cannot live here anymore or are you the agent of change a divine entity divulged the wrongs and you're going to right them all? The aborted babies? Climate change? Over-population? Famine? Peace? What wrong did you forget because you're stuck with the "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" types. You're forgetting it is an open ended process that this Grand Experiment really is.


I fail to see the point here. You're putting words in my mouth; but ramble on...

DrMaddVibe wrote:
The people read more then they do now. They didn't have tv...radio...telegraph...telephones...they had newspapers. It took days and weeks to reach the people. In most cases they'd read the entire thing front to back multiple times. You choose to make this some racial bender by interjecting the quote above. The ONLY point you made is that you want to racebait like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson!


I'm not race-baiting. Saying, as you have, by using the word "hisself" (and other intentionally misspelled words or improper grammar) is race-baiting.

DrMaddVibe wrote:
Then again, after reading The Federalist Papers...link provided, you're welcome...

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html

You'd be able to deduce that you don't have to be a rocket surgeon to figure it all out. It's cliff note format is pretty basic. STILL can't figure it out? Well, back then you were encouraged to engage in conversation. Unless you're yoked by the neck and aren't "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" ignant. You're stuck in the mud with the "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" not willing to do anything for yourself. C'mon...you're better than that...aren't you?


This is not interesting.
HockeyDad Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Uninteresting outrage
DrMaddVibe Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
I don't teach animals, I teach undergraduates...although there are a few similarities. Let's see how quickly charges of "Marxism," "liberal-elitism," or "corrupting our nation's youth" come to play.

This is not interesting.




Yes...I KNEW it.

Thanks for playing.
tegulator Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Yes...I KNEW it.

Thanks for playing.


Thanks for having me.
bloody spaniard Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
LMAO!Applause
DrMaddVibe Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Thanks for having me.



Having you?

Nope.

You took the "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" line..NOT me...the minute you went to Boo-Hoo town...I KNEW exactly which side your bread is buttered on and called it out. That dog don't hunt! Not today not yesterday.
tegulator Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Boo-hoo town doesn't allow dogs; so you're correct, that dog *literally* does not hunt (at least in Boo-hoo town).
DrMaddVibe Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Boo-hoo town doesn't allow dogs; so you're correct, that dog *literally* does not hunt (at least in Boo-hoo town).



You're the one crying the blues.

You're washed up old "oh, The Man is keepin' me down" schtick is amusing. Even with a degree...can't take the boy out of the trailer park and can't take the trailer park out of the boy! You're slipping.

BooHootown is in need of a mayor...you'd be perfect, but oh wait...you'll never leave the classroom where you can pontificate and spew your garbage.
tegulator Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
You know nothing of Boo-hoo town! Well, except for the fact that we don't allow dogs...
ZRX1200 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Whats the marxist professors favorite cigar?
DrafterX Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
tegulator wrote:
You know nothing of Boo-hoo town! Well, except for the fact that we don't allow dogs...



Bassards..!! Mad
DrMaddVibe Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
BooHootown...where the Vagisil flows like water and the repressed scream "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" are keeping me down all the time! What do we want?...Repairations...when do we want it?...When the union gives it to us!
tegulator Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
ZRX1200 wrote:
Whats the marxist professors favorite cigar?


An Añejo 55...very, very tasty smoke.
tegulator Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrafterX wrote:
Bassards..!! Mad


I actually voted against it, but I'm just on the Boo-hoo town town council...and democracy being what it is and all, I lost.
tegulator Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
BooHootown...where the Vagisil flows like water and the repressed scream "educated, white, property-owning, males with the means to inform themselves" are keeping me down all the time! What do we want?...Repairations...when do we want it?...When the union gives it to us!


Unions were phased out a long time ago when the Proletariat rose up and seized the means of production. Now we just sit in drum circles, sing kumbaya, and thank God-Marx that we don't have any messy dogs.
bloody spaniard Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
You guys have all the fun here.Herfing

Tegulator, you a marxist? (sorry, I've only skimmed a few posts)
DrafterX Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
Teg is a puppy-dog hater by association.... Mad
bloody spaniard Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
DrafterX wrote:
Teg is a puppy-dog hater by association.... Mad



Damn, that's not right!
Puppies should be loved. They are delicious!
tegulator Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
bloody spaniard wrote:
You guys have all the fun here.Herfing

Tegulator, you a marxist? (sorry, I've only skimmed a few posts)


No, I'm not a Marxist. I have a lot of sympathy for his project and what he was trying to do, but I can't really get behind the politics of it and the way certain later thinkers articulate it.

And no, I don't hate puppies!
DrafterX Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
that Nicar guy kicks his puppy-dog.... Mellow
dpnewell Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
tegulator wrote:
No, I'm not a Marxist. I have a lot of sympathy for his project and what he was trying to do, but I can't really get behind the politics of it and the way certain later thinkers articulate it.

And no, I don't hate puppies!


Wow, like I didn't see that one coming.

"I'm not a racist. I have a lot of sympathy for the KKK and what they where trying to do, but I can't get behind their politics, nor the actions taken by some in that group. But I'm not a racist."

Give me a frack'n break!
tegulator Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
I'm glad you foresaw it and had the insight to give such an accurate comparison!
Rick Wingfield Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2013
Posts: 25
You can be a debilled duck and have the media thrust the feeding tube down your gullet to fill your belly with the pap that they spew or you can understand the fundamental necessity of each and every American to keep and bear arms when necessary.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed."

United States Constitution, Amendment II
Bill of Rights
dpnewell Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
tegulator wrote:
I'm glad you foresaw it and had the insight to give such an accurate comparison!


Whatever I can do to brighten your day, Prof.
HockeyDad Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Rick Wingfield wrote:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed."

United States Constitution, Amendment II
Bill of Rights


Security of a free State...free...its not like we're that free anyway.
DrafterX Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
still no free gubment cheese for X..... Sad
DadZilla3 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
jackconrad wrote:
In a speech to House Democrats, Biden claimed, “It is clearly within the right of the government to determine what type of weapons can be owned by the public.”

Maybe he was talking about the federal government cracking down on the 800,000 or so street gang members violating weapons laws already on the books in the USA.

Yeah, that's it...Biden meant cracking down on street gang weapons.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
DadZilla3 wrote:
Maybe he was talking about the federal government cracking down on the 800,000 or so street gang members violating weapons laws already on the books in the USA.

Yeah, that's it...Biden meant cracking down on street gang weapons.



Pretty sure he was talking about the "Fast & Furious" gunrunning operation this administration has taken worldwide!...you want a MAC10?...sorry...we no a sella those this week...wea only gots a M16's! HEY! You takes what we sella ya!whip
Rick Wingfield Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2013
Posts: 25
DadZilla3 wrote:
Maybe he was talking about the federal government cracking down on the 800,000 or so street gang members violating weapons laws already on the books in the USA.

Yeah, that's it...Biden meant cracking down on street gang weapons.


Yea... that's the ticket, ehhhh it's Biden wanting to crack down on gang violence... ya that's itBrick wall
Rick Wingfield Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2013
Posts: 25
tegulator wrote:
No, I'm not a Marxist. I have a lot of sympathy for his project and what he was trying to do, but I can't really get behind the politics of it and the way certain later thinkers articulate it.

And no, I don't hate puppies!


The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property.
Karl Marx

Are you now ready to join a kubbitz???

Seriously, you have a lot of sympathy for his "project" ?

20 million dead, conservatively in Russia by the hand of Lenin and Stalin
40 million dead, conservatively in China by the hand of "chairman" Mao

Need I go on to list all of the failed attempts to remove individual responsibilities from the caring of our own, and our brothers well being. Once you take the desire to care for one another and pass that responsibility to someone else more "enlightened" to take care of the needs of the people then you remove that bond between mankind in general. The United States of America is the most giving country in the world. We as a country give to more charitable organizations and to each other than any other country... why?? because we know that it is our responsibility to do so. God, yes I said it, God has given us inalienable rights that no man can take away. Mr. Marx, and his ilk, first remove God from the equation which then gives the "enlightened" ones the ability to determine what is necessary for each and every one for our own good. Once God is removed then it becomes easy to defer our individual responsibility to each other as human beings to look out for our own well being. Having compassion for your fellow man is not relying on someone else to do it. It's having the love in your own heart to look out for your brother. Once you take God out and remove the individual from any responsibility to his fellow man it then becomes easy to view him as inanimate, with less feeling of what does or does not happen to them. No longer caring for each other but for ones own well being. It then doesn't matter that your neighbor is taken out and shot. There is no longer that bond that binds us as human beings. That is the only way that you can attribute the calamitous numbers of deaths that have befallen those that live by the belief and the release of not having to answer to a greater one than us.

Your sympathy is miss placed.



dpnewell Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
^Well said, Rick, but you really shouldn't try to confuse the dear professor with facts and opinions that differ from the liberal party line.
tegulator Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Rick Wingfield wrote:
The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property.
Karl Marx

Are you now ready to join a kubbitz???

Seriously, you have a lot of sympathy for his "project" ?

20 million dead, conservatively in Russia by the hand of Lenin and Stalin
40 million dead, conservatively in China by the hand of "chairman" Mao

Need I go on to list all of the failed attempts to remove individual responsibilities from the caring of our own, and our brothers well being. Once you take the desire to care for one another and pass that responsibility to someone else more "enlightened" to take care of the needs of the people then you remove that bond between mankind in general. The United States of America is the most giving country in the world. We as a country give to more charitable organizations and to each other than any other country... why?? because we know that it is our responsibility to do so. God, yes I said it, God has given us inalienable rights that no man can take away. Mr. Marx, and his ilk, first remove God from the equation which then gives the "enlightened" ones the ability to determine what is necessary for each and every one for our own good. Once God is removed then it becomes easy to defer our individual responsibility to each other as human beings to look out for our own well being. Having compassion for your fellow man is not relying on someone else to do it. It's having the love in your own heart to look out for your brother. Once you take God out and remove the individual from any responsibility to his fellow man it then becomes easy to view him as inanimate, with less feeling of what does or does not happen to them. No longer caring for each other but for ones own well being. It then doesn't matter that your neighbor is taken out and shot. There is no longer that bond that binds us as human beings. That is the only way that you can attribute the calamitous numbers of deaths that have befallen those that live by the belief and the release of not having to answer to a greater one than us.

Your sympathy is miss placed.



You've obviously read Marx.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
You've obviously read Marx.



I believe the correct word is understood not read.
DadZilla3 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Rick Wingfield wrote:
Yea... that's the ticket, ehhhh it's Biden wanting to crack down on gang violence... ya that's itBrick wall

I do feel way more safer already.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
REGULATORS...Saddle up!

horse horse horse
HockeyDad Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Rick Wingfield wrote:
20 million dead, conservatively in Russia by the hand of Lenin and Stalin
40 million dead, conservatively in China by the hand of "chairman" Mao




They had extra people. Think of it as a "reduction in force" Those countries are doing fine now.
Buckwheat Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
drywalldog wrote:
They have been regulating them since 1968, where have you guys been?


Since 1934, where have you been? Sarcasm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12