America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by Whistlebritches. 43 replies replies.
Baby Killer Abortionist , Guilty in Philly !!
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
wheelrite Offline
#1 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 6:07 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
I am against the Death Penalty but if anyone deserves it, this Butcher Abortionist does..








By MARYCLAIRE DALE Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA May 13, 2013 (AP)







An abortion doctor was convicted Monday of first-degree murder and could face execution in the deaths of three babies who were delivered alive and then killed with scissors at his grimy, "house of horrors" clinic.

In a case that became a grisly flashpoint in the nation's abortion debate, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, 72, was also found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the overdose death of an abortion patient. He was cleared in the death of a fourth baby, who prosecutors say let out a whimper before the doctor cut the spinal cord.

Gosnell, who portrayed himself as an advocate for poor and desperate women in an impoverished West Philadelphia neighborhood, appeared hopeful before the verdict was read and calm afterward.


wheel
ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 6:32 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
I am pro death penalty and I hope he rots in hell.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 6:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
Take him out the same way he took out the other babies.

Justice will be served.

People turned their backs on what was going on there for years because if they uttered the horrors...they feared abortions would no longer be paid by the taxpayers.
Burner02 Offline
#4 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 6:39 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
ZRX1200 wrote:
I am pro death penalty and I hope he rots in hell.





+1
paulkeck Offline
#5 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 6:41 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
Burner02 wrote:
+1

X2
dpnewell Offline
#6 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 7:36 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.
wheelrite Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 7:37 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
dpnewell wrote:
What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.


um, yes..

both are murder,,,
HockeyDad Offline
#8 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 7:46 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,199
dpnewell wrote:
What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.



One is murder, one is a woman's right to choose.
jackconrad Offline
#9 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 8:48 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Death is too good for him. Torture for years is more suitable

Send Him too Egypt with a Convert to Christianity or be damned sign on his back ..
MACS Offline
#10 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 8:50 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,899
HockeyDad wrote:
One is murder, one is a woman's right to choose (murder).


Fixed!
Gene363 Offline
#11 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:29 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,876
I have no problem with the death penalty. Show me a crowd bomber, child toucher or sex pervert and I'll be glad to pull the switch, but not in this case. The woman he killed by neglect/incompetence is bad, but not death penalty level murder.

As for killing those babies, unless they prosecute the co-conspirators he shouldn't get the death penalty. Who are these co-conspirators? The mothers of those children that came to this doctor to get rid of their babies, Like paying for a hit on someone, they conspired to murder. If it wasn't for them, there would have been no dead babies.

I'm not defending this guy, this story made me cry. When he started out doing abortions it was in the early stages of pregnancy. Back in a time women were dying all the time from back street abortions. Over time, it got later and later into the pregnancy, each time a desperate mother asking him to kill her child. I don't care who you are, after a while that has to mess up your mind. Again, it's no excuse for what went on in the clinic, but it might explain how it ended up where it did.
Brewha Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:42 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .
wheelrite Offline
#13 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:43 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Gene363 wrote:
I have no problem with the death penalty. Show me a crowd bomber, child toucher or sex pervert and I'll be glad to pull the switch, but not in this case. The woman he killed by neglect/incompetence is bad, but not death penalty level murder.

As for killing those babies, unless they prosecute the co-conspirators he shouldn't get the death penalty. Who are these co-conspirators? The mothers of those children that came to this doctor to get rid of their babies, Like paying for a hit on someone, they conspired to murder. If it wasn't for them, there would have been no dead babies.

I'm not defending this guy, they story make me cry. When he started out doing abortions it was in the early stages of pregnancy. Back in a time women were dying all the time from back street abortions. Over time, it got later and later into the pregnancy, each time a desperate mother asking him to kill her child. I don't care who you are, after a while that has to mess up your mind. Again, it's no excuse for what went on in the clinic, but it might explain how it ended up where it did.


what difference do co-conspirators have to do with his guilt and punishment ??

he did what he did ...

btw,

he kept Fetus' in jars and did what he did for money,,

The reason why he did it means nothing,,,


wheel,
Gene363 Offline
#14 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:49 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,876
Brewha wrote:
This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .


It doesn't require religion to know killing children is just a bad idea all by it's self.
wheelrite Offline
#15 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:55 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .


dude,,
even this post is beneath you,,,

religion has nothing to do with killing babies,,,

This case strips away the antiseptic vision of Abortion that Planned Parenthood has depicted for the masses,,
ever seen a puppy put down ?

wheel,
Confuzed Offline
#16 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 9:57 PM EST
Joined: 07-19-2012
Posts: 1,571
Snipping the spinal cord of a 32 week old baby--- Murder. Taking money to do it time and time again--- Just disgusting. There is no "choice" at this stage... Stuffing a baby in a shoe box after you sever his/her spinal cord? Seriously? The mothers who knew what they were getting themselves into should be punished the same.

The dealth penalty is too easy... I say pass him around D Block for a few years THEN fry his ass... I can admit I probably shouldn't feel this way...maybe I'm wrong...can't help it, though...

This guy is more wretched than Kevorkian..
Gene363 Offline
#17 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:02 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,876
wheelrite wrote:
what difference do co-conspirators have to do with his guilt and punishment ??

he did what he did ...

btw,

he kept Fetus' in jars and did what he did for money,,

The reason why he did it means nothing,,,


wheel,


He did what he did because the mothers of those dead babies wanted it done and paid to get done. Unless I missed something in the trial, he didn't kidnap them and bring them in for an abortion, they wanted those babies dead. That is what abortion is all about. As big as some of those babies were those mothers felt their kicking in their womb, but they still went to this monster to get them murdered.

I'm not giving him a by, he needs to be severely punished. He will die in jail either doing life or awaiting another death penalty appeal. Let him stay alive and become the new face of the pro choice movement. Or, as Mac aptly posted, the right to chose murder. Stoning him to death seams almost too good, but we have laws and I don't want to be anything like Iran.
wheelrite Offline
#18 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:06 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Gene363 wrote:

He did what he did because the mothers of those dead babies wanted it done and paid to get done. Unless I missed something in the trial, he didn't kidnap them and bring them in for an abortion, they wanted those babies dead. That is what abortion is all about. As big as some of those babies were those mothers felt their kicking in their womb, but they still went to this monster to get them murdered.

I'm not giving him a by, he needs to be severely punished. He will die in jail either doing life or awaiting another death penalty appeal. Let him stay alive and become the new face of the pro choice movement. Or, as Mac aptly posted, the right to chose murder. Stoning him to death seams almost too good, but we have laws and I don't want to be anything like Iran.


ok Gene,,

whatever,,,

So,
If I want someone dead, the guy that kills that person gets a free pass ?

convaluted logic my friend,,
blakedeshotel1 Offline
#19 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:06 PM EST
Joined: 03-02-2013
Posts: 1,151
One thing I have to say bout this low life piece of **** I'm all for death penalty but I think thats to light of a sentence nail that bastid to a tree with honey all over him and make sure he is in a bed of fire ants and let them eat him alive screw abortion a human is a human no matter age r size its still murder. Ok that's my rant if some one doesn't like it oh well you'll get over r not any way I don't care good night folks


Blake
Gene363 Offline
#20 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:11 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,876
wheelrite wrote:
ok Gene,,

whatever,,,

So,
If I want someone dead, the guy that kills that person gets a free pass ?

convaluted logic my friend,,


Free pass? Hey, do I smell alcohol?d'oh! d'oh! d'oh!
wheelrite Offline
#21 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:12 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Gene363 wrote:

Free pass? Hey, do I smell alcohol?d'oh! d'oh! d'oh!


only if you spilled a Cosmo on your wife beater !
Burner02 Offline
#22 Posted: Mon, May 13 2013, 10:17 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
dpnewell wrote:
What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.




Yep, agree.
rfenst Offline
#23 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:13 AM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,447
Gene363 wrote:
I have no problem with the death penalty. Show me a crowd bomber, child toucher or sex pervert and I'll be glad to pull the switch, but not in this case. The woman he killed by neglect/incompetence is bad, but not death penalty level murder.

As for killing those babies, unless they prosecute the co-conspirators he shouldn't get the death penalty. Who are these co-conspirators? The mothers of those children that came to this doctor to get rid of their babies, Like paying for a hit on someone, they conspired to murder. If it wasn't for them, there would have been no dead babies.

I'm not defending this guy, they story make me cry. When he started out doing abortions it was in the early stages of pregnancy. Back in a time women were dying all the time from back street abortions. Over time, it got later and later into the pregnancy, each time a desperate mother asking him to kill her child. I don't care who you are, after a while that has to mess up your mind. Again, it's no excuse for what went on in the clinic, but it might explain how it ended up where it did.


Gene,

Interesting take and good explanation of your thought.

RF
teedubbya Offline
#24 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:22 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
wheelrite wrote:
ok Gene,,

whatever,,,

So,
If I want someone dead, the guy that kills that person gets a free pass ?

convaluted logic my friend,,


Reading comptrehension is a lost art.
paulkeck Offline
#25 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:30 AM EST
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
teedubbya wrote:
Reading comptrehension is a lost art.

so is the art of spelling!!!!
teedubbya Offline
#26 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:31 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
paulkeck wrote:
so is the art of spelling!!!!


never have been able to spelt (or type)
paulkeck Offline
#27 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:33 AM EST
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
teedubbya wrote:
never have been able to spelt (or type)

me either just busting your chops
teedubbya Offline
#28 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:35 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
its just too damn easy though
paulkeck Offline
#29 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:38 AM EST
Joined: 02-24-2013
Posts: 2,686
teedubbya wrote:
its just too damn easy though

yeah this forum is a chit talkers paradise
teedubbya Offline
#30 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 11:40 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
that's what mekase it great

(purposely didn't fix spellins
DadZilla3 Offline
#31 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 12:34 PM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Brewha wrote:
But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .

There would actually two opposing religious agendas at play there. We'd have the pro-life Christians who tout that way-out doctrine of 'thou shalt not kill' on the one side, and the pro-choice women's rights types for whom abortion is the primary sacrament of the feminist church on the other.
Gene363 Offline
#32 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 12:50 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,876
DadZilla3 wrote:
There would actually two opposing religious agendas at play there. We'd have the pro-life Christians who tout that way-out doctrine of 'thou shalt not kill' on the one side, and the pro-choice women's rights types for whom abortion is the primary sacrament of the feminist church on the other.


Well said.

Pro choice makes the Old Testament sound pretty tame, too bad (for babies) it's their New Testament.
teedubbya Offline
#33 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 12:56 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
"primary sacrament of the feminist church "

interesting
TimFusco Offline
#34 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 9:12 PM EST
Joined: 08-10-2012
Posts: 928
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Take him out the same way he took out the other babies.




Bingo. Bolt cutters at the base of the neck.
jetblasted Offline
#35 Posted: Tue, May 14 2013, 10:27 PM EST
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Or, going back to hanging on the court house steps !!

That'd stop it in an instant.

But, Wait !!

What about the poor sumbitch who was in the wrong place and the wrong time ??

Well, that'd stop that, too. No more wrong sumbitches in the wrong place !!

Duh !!

horse
Buckwheat Offline
#36 Posted: Wed, May 15 2013, 3:13 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Matthew 7:1-5
tegulator Offline
#37 Posted: Wed, May 15 2013, 4:40 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Buckwheat wrote:
Matthew 7:1-5


And Ephesians 4:31-32.
Brewha Offline
#38 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 5:17 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
wheelrite wrote:
dude,,
even this post is beneath you,,,

religion has nothing to do with killing babies,,,

This case strips away the antiseptic vision of Abortion that Planned Parenthood has depicted for the masses,,
ever seen a puppy put down ?

wheel,

Religion has everything to do with calling legal, first trimester abortions murder - which is what you do my friend. And as I said, this guy was murdering.

And you just watch these puppy allusions, or Drafter post the angry emoticon on you!
Brewha Offline
#39 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 5:18 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Gene363 wrote:

It doesn't require religion to know killing children is just a bad idea all by it's self.

Careful Gene, you are dangerously close to making a point.
Brewha Offline
#40 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 5:30 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DadZilla3 wrote:
There would actually two opposing religious agendas at play there. We'd have the pro-life Christians who tout that way-out doctrine of 'thou shalt not kill' on the one side, and the pro-choice women's rights types for whom abortion is the primary sacrament of the feminist church on the other.

Feminists believe in God?









Just kidding . . . .
DadZilla3 Offline
#41 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 6:37 PM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Brewha wrote:
Feminists believe in God?

Feminists are not strictly speaking monotheistic. Their guiding spirit is more an amalgam of Billy Jean King, Ellen DeGeneres, k d lang, Marissa Etheridge, and Marlena Dietrich.
Brewha Offline
#42 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 9:47 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DadZilla3 wrote:
Feminists are not strictly speaking monotheistic. Their guiding spirit is more an amalgam of Billy Jean King, Ellen DeGeneres, k d lang, Marissa Etheridge, and Marlena Dietrich.

Marlena Dietrich as a god? Ha!



Ok, I could see that . . . .
Whistlebritches Offline
#43 Posted: Thu, May 16 2013, 10:44 PM EST
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,129
I've never prayed for a person to rot in hell......til I read the good doctors resume.If I could think of worse I would've prayed for it.




Ron
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top