America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by rfenst. 61 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
U.S. Supreme Court's milestone ruling protects cellphone privacy
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
jetblasted Offline
#51 Posted: Fri, Jun 27 2014, 4:00 PM EST
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I had an affair with a woman who had an affair w/ Gene Simmons. His affair was longer than my affair.
Abrignac Offline
#52 Posted: Fri, Jun 27 2014, 4:03 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
FWIW, the actual ruling was a really good one. It's very rare that the entire court agrees in a matter where civil liberties and police action are at odds.
teedubbya Offline
#53 Posted: Fri, Jun 27 2014, 4:05 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
jetblasted wrote:
I had an affair with a woman who had an affair w/ Gene Simmons. His affair was longer than my affair.



prolly due to his toungue
Gene363 Offline
#54 Posted: Fri, Jun 27 2014, 5:20 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,838
Abrignac wrote:
FWIW, the actual ruling was a really good one. It's very rare that the entire court agrees in a matter where civil liberties and police action are at odds.


True and the recess appointments B'slap was unanimous too. Gee, maybe some those right wing conservative wing nuts know a thing or two about freedom and following the Constitution. Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall
teedubbya Offline
#55 Posted: Fri, Jun 27 2014, 5:40 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Unanimous. The libtards occasionally get something right too.

The appointments was absurd.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#56 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 1:20 AM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
any respectable hacker can copy everything on your cell phone from

15 feet away on or off in less time then it takes to sneeze..
Gene363 Offline
#57 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 8:09 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,838
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
any respectable hacker can copy everything on your cell phone from

15 feet away on or off in less time then it takes to sneeze..



They would be breaking the law... like the police have been doing for some time now.
gryphonms Offline
#58 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 8:28 AM EST
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Rick, I do not follow what your comment about hackers has to do with a Supreme Court ruling.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#59 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 8:44 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
gryphonms wrote:
Rick, I do not follow what your comment about hackers has to do with a Supreme Court ruling.



Everyone's doing it so it's no big deal. It's the price of having a cellphone nowadays!Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan
DrafterX Offline
#60 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 9:52 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Wouldn't you have to have blue tooth turned on for that..?? Huh
rfenst Offline
#61 Posted: Sat, Jun 28 2014, 11:20 AM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
gryphonms wrote:
Rick, I do not follow what your comment about hackers has to do with a Supreme Court ruling.


I think his gist is that no matter what the law is, your cell phone data is accessible to all/others.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Back to Top