hinzna wrote:A) You should probably review your writing before bashing someone's editing abilities.(I.e. you're*, and "ability to edit, period".*) Just saying.
B) My comment actually spoke nothing towards my political affiliation, it was simply an observation. It is your kind of bull headed, outdated view (happens on both sides) of the world that keeps productive dialogue from happening, an attitude which is little different than "throwing gas on the fire". And in regards to "grotesque" homosexuality... it isn't a social issue, and it's your own fault if someone else's life bothers you that much. Whether or not I agree with it literally makes no difference. It is not the government's job to decide "natural order", and just the fact that you feel entitled to be offended by someone else's life because their views don't align with yours means that they are just as entitled to the same opinion of who you are. The bottom line is that the whole basis of our freedom is equal liberties for all citizens, not just the ones who are "American" enough. Remember, not too long ago many believed that it was "grotesque and socially unacceptable" for black people to use the same facilities as whites. And if you're planning on saying "that's not the same thing", it really is (aside from us dragging them over on boats and dehumanizing them for centuries). It is about civil liberties for Americans, and gay people have as much choice about who they are as we have about the color of our skin. So no, it's not just throwing gas on the fire, but the only reason you're even reading this far is to get more material to fire back at me with, which is why I don't usually find it worthwhile to actually get involved with these things.on the internet.
C) I prefer the term, "stirring the pot".
And
I prefer the term legislating a " feel good feeling " and to compare this ( being Gay ) to ones skin color is just foolish....one had NO choice, the other most definitely DOES. It's interesting that just recently a State Senator who had previously voted time and again to Uphold DOMA ( defense of Marriage Act ) = one man / one woman all of the sudden changed directions when finding out his son was Gay. And THAT is how this whole agends has gotten the legs it has. Apparently that's all it takes is to have one somewhere in the family and folks toss out ALL previously held beliefs BECAUSE otherwise they will be viewed as some kind of Hater, and that's just not the case. And for the record your referral to my thinking being " outdated " times don't change tool bag....people do!!! And as far as
" someone else's life bothering me " as stated many times before, I Do Not care what happens in the privacy of ones home, just don't legislate your sexual preference on the rest who do not see it the same.