America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by teddyballgame. 82 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Time to clarify "Natural Born" in the constitution ?
gummy jones Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
tigers kill whatever the heck they want
teddyballgame Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Brewha wrote:
Your vision sir, is what superman sees when he looks at lead. And he would not feel jealousy in your regard if you were Lois Lane kissing Lex Luthur.

(I would like to take a moment and apologized to my fellow Cbid posters for the suggested and repulsive image of TBG dresses as Lois Lane. I fully realize that it now cannot be "unseen"and will likely haunt the dark corners of your mind. Again, please accept my apology in this matter.)

Cbid is more conservative than not. And most, in true conservative form, discuss and debate. As opposed to your simple poop slinging, labeling, and general vitriol toward those who differ with your rather narrow field of view. Where they argue points in earnest, you foster dissension. So while your views may have there roots in conservatism, your attitudes are those of an extremist.




(putting down my poop catapult)

And I stopped wearing dresses when Bruce Jenner made it so "in" to do so. I was the trail blazer...dammit! But that would be a repulsive sight as I do not shave my legs and I have a very broad shoulders.

I am an unabashed conservative, firm in my belief in the Constitution and limits on a central national government.
It is odd and sad that liberals (there's that label again) consider anyone that wants to adhere to the founding document of the country "extremist."

The country for 100 years has been veering left and look where we are now. It is time to right the ship and steer back towards the brilliant vision of the framers.
Change is hard, don't be afraid of it though.. it is toward Liberty of the individual that we seek.

on a side note, I must have missed your short list of whom you consider real conservatives in politics.

tonygraz Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Cheer up Teddy, I'm sure you are on a lot of short lists. Perhaps you should put on your dress and go and join the the other true conservative patriots in Oregon.
DrafterX Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
Think
you have to be a conservative to call yourself a patriot..?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Yes.
DrafterX Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
Lincoln would be pissed... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teedubbya wrote:
Yes.

no
teedubbya Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
maybe?
DrafterX Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
I heard Obama is gonna enact a Patriot tax.. your gonna have to get a permit and put on a list and stuff... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
DrafterX wrote:
I heard Obama is gonna enact a Patriot tax.. . Mellow


Roger Goodell has already done that.
tonygraz Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Saw an interesting article with Ted Cruz's constitutional law professor. It seems that Ted is an original constitution proponent, which would make him ineligible for office.
Also, that would also preclude any laws or changes to the constitution, like maybe all the amendments. Teddy got some splainin' to do.
frankj1 Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
tailgater wrote:
Roger Goodell has already done that.

you are on comedic fire!
Brewha Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
teddyballgame wrote:
(putting down my poop catapult)

And I stopped wearing dresses when Bruce Jenner made it so "in" to do so. I was the trail blazer...dammit! But that would be a repulsive sight as I do not shave my legs and I have a very broad shoulders.

I am an unabashed conservative, firm in my belief in the Constitution and limits on a central national government.
It is odd and sad that liberals (there's that label again) consider anyone that wants to adhere to the founding document of the country "extremist."

The country for 100 years has been veering left and look where we are now. It is time to right the ship and steer back towards the brilliant vision of the framers.
Change is hard, don't be afraid of it though.. it is toward Liberty of the individual that we seek.

on a side note, I must have missed your short list of whom you consider real conservatives in politics.


When you say "broad shoulders", you mean shoulders like a broad???
(Jk)

Now I feel that adhering to the founding documents is right and honorable. And your view are positively conservative - it is your actions that are extreme. And that does not do your views justice. I mean if your so damn right, then sell it.

Oh, there is no list.
tonygraz Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Yep T-ball and the real conservatives wanna go back 240 years - does that mean before those darn amendments ?







52
frankj1 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
what's up with the 51's and 52's?
teedubbya Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
1738 mofo
tonygraz Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
frankj1 wrote:
what's up with the 51's and 52's?


Aha ! Someone is observant ! It's a meaningful number for something (Iowa not involved).
teddyballgame Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tonygraz wrote:
Yep T-ball and the real conservatives wanna go back 240 years - does that mean before those darn amendments ?





This is what is meant by ''originalist" when we are talking constitution- or at least the constitutional conservatives that I follow:

http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/introessays/3/the-originalist-perspective


The framers also put in ways for "those darn amendments" to be added to the Constitution. So if we are amending it the way that is put forth in the Constitution, I am ok with that.

But that is not how its going now, is it?

The constitution is not being followed.

I'd be ok going back 150yrs.
DrafterX Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
150 years..?? So the Indian treaties will still be in effect..?? Huh
Brewha Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
150 years..?? So the Indian treaties will still be in effect..?? Huh

Like we honored them in the first place....
DrafterX Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
ya... Sad


Bassards... Mad
tailgater Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
what's up with the 51's and 52's?


He's counting to 57 in honor of Obama's Islamic states.



teddyballgame Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tailgater wrote:
He's counting to 57 in honor of Obama's Islamic states.






+1

ThumpUp
tonygraz Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Nope.

and it's not the number of meaningful posts by tailgater either.
tailgater Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Then it's in honor of John Kerry's wife.

Same goal of 57.
ZRX1200 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,662
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd703.htm

Plenty of links in the article which is why I didn't post the text. Look at the JB Williams link when you're done with the entire article.
tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
uh, that would be a "no".

If I had two sh*ts I wouldn't give one of them.
tailgater Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Ok.
I did peek.

But I didn't read it.

Yet.


ZRX1200 Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,662
It's biased, but just pay attention to the info not the rhetoric.
teddyballgame Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Silly article.

When the author says "the very dangerous Mark Levin.." I know he is a kook.

big time biased.

tonygraz Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,320
Read another article about Cruz and the birther thing. Seems his late brother's birth certificate has her last name as Wilson on that certificate.
He says his Dad and Mom married a year before he was born, but there seems to be no marriage record.
When one of the boys was born Mom's ex-hubby was in the hospital at the same time and was rather surprised she was having a child and said he hadn't seen her in over a year.
Lots of questions to be made here.
teddyballgame Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
area 51 is needing your attention too tony.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12