hoyodude wrote:You mean "over rated" like the ones you guys love that I didn't? Hell, everyone's palate is their own. I'm thinking this isn't a very relevant thing, from my experience. Disappointing would be a better term. Ratings, in my way of thinking, are for Cigar Aficionado reading noobies.
Yep........disappointing is a much better term.
The numerical "scoring" that goes on with cigars, wine, scotch, beer, etc., ................it's just a "business" for the most part.
Assigning an objective rating, to something which is subjectively experienced or evaluated, is always loaded with controversy, and too often, an element of corruption.
I always put more trust what 50 end users say about a cigar, than what one "expert" says................how's that for a captain obvious moment?