America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Get alot of illegal sea creatures trying to get into da city..??

Takes a lot to freeze SALT WATER FILLED WITH HUMAN CRAP...which is exactly what is in Boston's Harbor...

When this thaws? Nathaniel Hall Market area will be filled with TURDS AND USED CHARMIN TISSUE...

I dunno Mr. Jones...I heard reports of frozen sharks washing ashore...THAT's COLD...

Or just some zombie sheep types that frequent a cigar forums site........

when I was a boy, global warming was just called summertime...

The real money is in denying...just ask Big Energy.

Tailgater, it sounds to me that you don't believe in global warming. I find it disappointing that you are so familiar with the weather, tides, moon cycle, etc, But not in global warming. Im not.saying the flood happened directly due to global warming but in some small way has done so indirectly.

The scientific consensus is clear. Building on two previous studies (Doran and Zimmerman 2009 and Anderegg et al. 2010), a landmark 2013 peer-reviewed study evaluated 10,306 scientists to confirm that over 97 percent climate scientists agree, and over 97 percent of scientific articles find that global warming is real and largely caused by humans.

Liberal Conspiracy?

Climate change is a hoax created by the Chinese!

DEY WUNT ER JERBS!

Marco Polo came back with noodles

He said "in the history of China", have to take him at his word. HaHaHaHa!!!!!!!!
Of course, the ignorant troll has no conception of China's history. Not like he ever read a book on the subject.

Apparently, we sent the Chinese noodles.

chow mein or lo mein?

Cretin

....When I began to research ... noodle – Noodle meaning “simpleton” is probably unrelated to noodle meaning “pasta.” Noodle meaning “stupid person” was in use ...

I agree, 98% of the time.
But this was from a site called "union of concerned scientists "
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming#.WlBHXGhOmf0

Besides, even if man is not responsible for it, wouldn't you rather err on the side of caution?
I would.

Create crap like ethanol that causes the price of milk and beef to skyrocket so we can feel better about the ozone layer..??

It dont really matter now anyhow... 100% of all of you are going to die anyway. Give the worry to the next generation. If they blame me I wont give a chit cause I will be dead as well so I am not going to waste what time I have stressing over it. Not like any of the everyday peeps will listen to wise advice any way cause they all a bunch of idiots, cry babies and butt hurt puzzies.

Just my .02

And we have another example of a liberal not being able to have a conversation without disparaging counter opinions...

THIS

^+1

LOL!

Consensus?

Tell me, what percentage of global climate change is caused by the burning of fossil fuels?
Because that's what being taxed.

Now, what percentage is caused by our exponential human population growth?
And clear cutting forests?
And by the way we feed the burgeoning population with crop and feedstock acres?
And by how humans now populate coastlines? And control rivers?
And how giant concrete heat absorbing cities are growing larger and larger?

Yet none of these things are being addressed beyond a mere mention in any of the protocols to "curb climate change".
Only carbon credits.

And your "consensus" is divided on at least one major factor: Carbon
Is the percent of carbon in our atmosphere a cause or an effect?
Because warmer air hold more carbon.

And our ONLY way to measure climate and atmosphere from thousands of years ago is to use deep ice sampling.
And does your "consensus" explain why high carbon content is proven to occur AFTER temperature spikes in climate?
If you're unsure what this means, you're not alone.

97%
LOL again.

You don't even know what the question is, so it's funny when you provide an answer.

97% of left funded climate researches agree, the subject requires more funding.

I think that percentage is low.

All of these will require additional funding to see wuz up...


1.) Scientists predicted in 2000 that kids would grow up without snow. It was 14 years ago now when UK climate scientists argued that global warming would make snowfall a “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000.

After the wettest winter in 248 years, the UK was hit with snowstorms last week. Last year, the UK’s climate authority predicted that this winter would be drier than usual, with only a 15 percent chance of being wet. They were very wrong.

2.) It’s been 10 years since scientists predicted the “end of skiing” in Scotland. An article from the UK’s Guardian in 2004 quoted scientists and environmentalists predicting the demise of Scotland’s winter sports industry, including more remarks from Dr. David Viner, who had already predicted the end of snow in Britain.

“Unfortunately, it’s just getting too hot for the Scottish ski industry,” said Dr. Viner. “It is very vulnerable to climate change; the resorts have always been marginal in terms of snow and, as the rate of climate change increases, it is hard to see a long-term future.”

“Adam Watson, from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Banchory, Aberdeenshire, believes the industry has no more than 20 years left,” the Guardian reported.

Viner and Watson must have been surprised to see the BBC report that Scottish mountains may be their snowiest since 1945.

3.) The Arctic would be “ice-free” by now. “Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” Gore said in 2008.

Gore was echoing the predictions made by American scientist Wieslaw Maslowsk in 2007, who said that “you can argue that may be our projection of [an ice-free Arctic by 2013] is already too conservative.”

But in 2013, Arctic sea ice coverage was up 50 percent from 2012 levels. Data from Europe’s Cryosat spacecraft showed that Arctic sea ice coverage was nearly 2,100 cubic miles by the end of this year’s melting season, up from about 1,400 cubic miles during the same time last year.

4.) Environmentalists predicted the end of spring snowfall. In March 2013, the Union of Concerned Scientists predicted that warmer springs would mean declines in snow cover.

“Warmer, earlier springs are a clear signal of a changing climate,” the group said. “March temperatures have grown 2.1 degrees (F) hotter, on average, in the United States since reliable record-keeping began in 1880s. Similarly, the first leaves have started appearing on plants several days earlier than they used to across the country.”

But the record levels of snowfall to hit this year may have caught UCS off guard. On Monday, the U.S. east coast was hit with a massive snowstorm that stretched for 1,300 miles and those in the Baltimore-D.C. area were hit with a 141-year record cold of 4 degrees Fahrenheit on Tuesday morning.

“Many places tied or broke record lows all over the Eastern half of the U.S.,”