tailgater wrote:Huck,
Poor use of quotes aside, you have to at least make an attempt to stay on topic.
You ask if I'm OK with Trump having sex with the porn star. I put it into context. You come back chastising me because Trump met with Russia.
Always Russia.
Then you put the knee in Irony by punctuating your rant with " I'd much rather he'd have sex in the oval office every hour on the hour."
Go on with your unabashed and irrational hatred.
No skin off my back.
But don't waste my time by pretending to want a conversation and then getting mad simply because I disagree with the premise that YOU float out there.
I got one word for you.
Russia.
(ducks)
Tail, you objected to Bill having sex in the oval office.
You know, the office where Donald gave Russians state secrets.
Yup, there entirely different scenarios, but which is worse was my...point...
See what I did there....?
But I'm sure Donald's chaste now of course...so it's a non issue.
But you're right. I can't have a really serious conversation with you.
To my way of thinking, you have this habit of erroneously reading what you imagine is on the page, missing actual points. It's amusing but, not productive for either of us.
You're right. It was time wasted. Apologies.
I made too much out of the obvious Russian connection, imagine...
Btw, I didn't ask for a conversation. In fact I asked that you didn't answer.
I known you are hard of hearing....opposing points of view.
You say I dont stay on topic...you mean cherry pick. Or nitpick. Ok.
Well I guess for me, some ideas are broader and connect with other ideas.
I know you have an ally in that assessment of me. *laughs...
Maybe I'm long-winded.. .I dunno...probably something like that..
..maybe one day we'll be able to design how others frame their arguments.
Anyway, no need to answer this post either!
Obviously we are experiencing different realities.
To be fair, congrats, yours seems less complicated.