victor809 wrote:Gene. You're either being obtuse or intentionally cryptic to avoid being called out in a lie.
If you're friends with women who are happy about an abortion they had in the past and have told you, then say so. And if you are, feel free to take back your statement referencing women regretting abortions. I don't care, neither way is it "statistics"... All I want you to do is stop with the "you're wrong about x"... Then "you're wrong about -1(x)" BS... Make an actual statement.
victor809 wrote:Yeah I'm gonna bet that the sample size of women willing to tell gene that they had an abortion in the past is pretty small. The chances of him having a friend who is both pleased and vocal about an abortion are about the same as me having a friend who's a vocal Evangelical.
Gene363 wrote:Well, you'd be wrong, again. So what is your count?
You able about a sample size, though I didn't claim to do a study. You never answer my question, but wander off to avoid the answer. You did say you have died for an abortion, but that is not very specific and you do live in California.
victor809 wrote:So now your stance is that you know women who are pleased they had abortions?
Your assumption, period and no response to my question.
Gene363 wrote:Just the opposite, now answer the question?
Your assumption continues, but you impune my comprehension:
victor809 wrote:Then your comprehension is poor.
I stated:
"The chances of him having a friend who is both pleased and vocal about an abortion are about the same as me having a friend who's a vocal Evangelical."
You chose to state I was wrong and that just the opposite is true.
Gene363 wrote:And... you're still wrong and failed to answer my question. On the positive side, you did bring up reading comprehension, you might want to work on yours.
victor809 wrote:Sigh.
If you believe that women who have had an abortion regret it 15 years later. Then why do you reference friends who are both pleased with and vocal about their past abortions.
You can't have it both ways gene. And I'm a male. I can't have an abortion. I have paid for them.
I didn't say it was both way, you made that assumption.
victor809 wrote:Where did I say they did? Jesus Christ gene... Be smarter.
I was specifically referencing sampling bias which in and of itself acknowledges that not all "of group x" think alike.
Ok... Let me spell this out very slowly for you.
You select your set of friends based on who you get along with. That likely requires having similar values. As such, your sample size of "women who regret abortions they had in the past" is likely irrelevant, because that's exactly the group which would lean anti abortion, and would then have things in common with you.
Your inability to understand my statements, claim I'm wrong when I say one thing, and wrong when I then state the exact opposite is ridiculous.
Gene363 wrote:You're so busy making assumptions that you cannot see that you are wrong, still. It is not impossible that I know people on the opposite ends the abortion issue. Perhaps you never associate with people that are not just like you, but some folks are a lot more open minded.
victor809 wrote:Gene. You're either being obtuse or intentionally cryptic to avoid being called out in a lie.
If you're friends with women who are happy about an abortion they had in the past and have told you, then say so. And if you are, feel free to take back your statement referencing women regretting abortions. I don't care, neither way is it "statistics"... All I want you to do is stop with the "you're wrong about x"... Then "you're wrong about -1(x)" BS... Make an actual statement.
Lie? It would be a lie if I stoped saying your wrong, because you are. I made my statement and your didn't like it, it's your problem, not mine.