America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by frankj1. 179 replies replies.
4 Pages1234>
So Trump and conservatives think social media is biased against them.
pacman357 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
We are spending yet more money to salve the wounds of the thinnest-skinned president ever. I cannot let this pass without comment.

1. THESE ARE NOT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, YOU TOOLS. The First Amendment does not apply to them. You don't like the neighborhood? Move! That's your working slogan, after all. Start up your own social media platform. You can even have a name I'll offer up, free of charge: Doucheface.

2. Shut them all down. Trump loves the media when they do his bidding. He hates them when they pierce his tissue-thin skin. Fine. Kill them all off. It'd be nice to go through a single day of this administration without having to hear about the multiple idiotic and false claims he makes on Twitter. I'm a big supporter of the First Amendment, but some times dropping a nuclear bomb on a large set of problems makes sense. Shut them all down. Trump can stand on the south lawn, mewling about how nobody gives him enough credit for things he hasn't done.

3. This only works if you shut down Fox "news".

4. Shut the muthereff up. Take your ball and go home. If you cannot figure out a way to spread your lies and disinformation, then you don't deserve to be spewing your hatred on the interwebs.

5. And a special message for the whiner-in-chief: I want him brought from his happy holiday slumber over there on Melody Lane with all the other rich people and I want him brought right here, with a big ribbon on his head, and I want to look him straight in the eye and I want to tell him what a cheap, lying, no-good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, blood-sucking, dog-kissing, brainless, dickless, hopeless, heartless, fat-ass, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sack of monkey shiat he is! Hallelujah! Holy ****! Where's the Tylenol?
victor809 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Can I get an A-MEN!

rfenst Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,336
Tylenol?
I was thinking more like Valium.
And... amen.
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,557
Hillary lost... Mellow
pacman357 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
DrafterX wrote:
Hillary lost... Mellow

Your wit and wisdom, together with your marvelous economy of language, borders on ultra-genius. I just wish to hell someone had bothered to tell me about Hillary sooner. That might be why all the mail I send her at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue keeps getting returned.

My most humble thanks for your keen insight.
RMAN4443 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
You should try contacting her illegal servers, you might have a better chance making contact.....at this point, what difference does it really make?
pacman357 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
RMAN4443 wrote:
You should try contacting her illegal servers, you might have a better chance making contact.....at this point, what difference does it really make?

So you point is that there is no point? Got it. Meanwhile, I am going to ignore the email server, especially since Ivanka and Jared have been doing similar stuff, and focus on the fact that the president is burning down the world. Call me when those email servers take over the world and start killing people. Or at least threaten to wipe Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea and any number of other countries off of the map. Or they start retrenching from parts of the world that Russia and China are now stepping in to fill. But yeah, the effing email server keeps me awake all night like a case of Red Bull spiked with meth.

d'oh!
MACS Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
So... who would have guessed that ol' Pacman has TDS?

*raises hand*
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,557
Laugh
dstieger Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
pacman357 wrote:
So Trump and conservatives think social media is biased against them.


pacman357 wrote:
We are spending yet more money to salve the wounds of the thinnest-skinned president ever. I cannot let this pass without comment.

1. THESE ARE NOT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, YOU TOOLS. The First Amendment does not apply to them. You don't like the neighborhood? Move! That's your working slogan, after all. Start up your own social media platform. You can even have a name I'll offer up, free of charge: Doucheface.

2. Shut them all down. Trump loves the media when they do his bidding. He hates them when they pierce his tissue-thin skin. Fine. Kill them all off. It'd be nice to go through a single day of this administration without having to hear about the multiple idiotic and false claims he makes on Twitter. I'm a big supporter of the First Amendment, but some times dropping a nuclear bomb on a large set of problems makes sense. Shut them all down. Trump can stand on the south lawn, mewling about how nobody gives him enough credit for things he hasn't done.

3. This only works if you shut down Fox "news".

4. Shut the muthereff up. Take your ball and go home. If you cannot figure out a way to spread your lies and disinformation, then you don't deserve to be spewing your hatred on the interwebs.

5. And a special message for the whiner-in-chief: I want him brought from his happy holiday slumber over there on Melody Lane with all the other rich people and I want him brought right here, with a big ribbon on his head, and I want to look him straight in the eye and I want to tell him what a cheap, lying, no-good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, blood-sucking, dog-kissing, brainless, dickless, hopeless, heartless, fat-ass, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sack of monkey shiat he is! Hallelujah! Holy ****! Where's the Tylenol?


Huh?

Are you channeling your own inner-Trump, pac? This is about as coherent as a Trumptweetstrom. Is this somehow about social media? Or 'mainstream media'? Or, does it really matter...its just an anti-Trump rant? The first amendment does not apply to whom? And how much money is being spent for what?
If you cannot figure out a way to spread your lies and disinformation, then you don't deserve to be spewing your hatred on the interwebs. :)
Buckwheat Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
RMAN4443 wrote:
.....at this point, what difference does it really make?


Applause
Speyside Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I get what Pac man is saying. Though I am no longer willing to let him affect me on a personal level. I hate Trump. Who ever the Democratic is in 2020 will get my vote.
MACS Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
Speyside wrote:
I get what Pac man is saying. Though I am no longer willing to let him affect me on a personal level. I hate Trump. Who ever the Democratic is in 2020 will get my vote.


Oh... my... GOD! You'd vote for a socialist because you hate Trump?

GTFO.
teedubbya Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Anyone who voted for the hot mess we have now because they hated hillary has no room to talk.

I'd vote ham sammich before voting for him.
victor809 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
Oh... my... GOD! You'd vote for a socialist because you hate Trump?

GTFO.


It's dumb azz comments like this which make me certain our nation will not survive.

It's "us vs them" on a bizarrely stupid scale. The democratic candidates aren't any more socialist than trump. They're just not distributing that tax money to the rich.

It shows a lack of understanding of what trump did, or of what any of the ridiculously stupid democratic party candidates are trying to do.

It shows a lack of understanding of how much damage trump is doing to our nation in ways which we will not be able to fix.

Ironically, a strong argument could be made that a truly socialist candidate (real "take the means of production" socialist) would do less damage to our nation than trump will in the next 6 years.

And most amusingly, it makes me more likely to vote for trump.

We don't deserve this nation. May as well vote for the candidate most likely to destroy it as quickly as possible.
RMAN4443 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
victor809 wrote:
It's dumb azz comments like this which make me certain our nation will not survive.

It's "us vs them" on a bizarrely stupid scale. The democratic candidates aren't any more socialist than trump. They're just not distributing that tax money to the rich.

It shows a lack of understanding of what trump did, or of what any of the ridiculously stupid democratic party candidates are trying to do.

It shows a lack of understanding of how much damage trump is doing to our nation in ways which we will not be able to fix.

Ironically, a strong argument could be made that a truly socialist candidate (real "take the means of production" socialist) would do less damage to our nation than trump will in the next 6 years.

And most amusingly, it makes me more likely to vote for trump.

We don't deserve this nation. May as well vote for the candidate most likely to destroy it as quickly as possible.

Spoken like a True Patriot....Not talking Applause ApplauseNot talking God Bless America
victor809 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
RMAN4443 wrote:
Spoken like a True Patriot....Not talking Applause ApplauseNot talking God Bless America


Of course you'd talk about patriotism.

The party trying to wrap itself in the flag and claim it's american supports a president who does not believe in 1st amendment rights, has tried to squash the press and has told legal american citizens to "go back to where they came from". This party is made up of citizens who believe the same thing.

Those citizens don't deserve the ideals of this nation, yet they claim to be the patriotic ones.

MACS Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
victor809 wrote:
It's dumb azz comments like this which make me certain our nation will not survive.

It's "us vs them" on a bizarrely stupid scale. The democratic candidates aren't any more socialist than trump. They're just not distributing that tax money to the rich.

It shows a lack of understanding of what trump did, or of what any of the ridiculously stupid democratic party candidates are trying to do.

It shows a lack of understanding of how much damage trump is doing to our nation in ways which we will not be able to fix.

Ironically, a strong argument could be made that a truly socialist candidate (real "take the means of production" socialist) would do less damage to our nation than trump will in the next 6 years.

And most amusingly, it makes me more likely to vote for trump.

We don't deserve this nation. May as well vote for the candidate most likely to destroy it as quickly as possible.


It's dumb azz comments like this which make me certain our nation will not survive.

Look in the mirror, pal. Bernie is a socialist, by his own admission. And he's likely the dems best shot.

You can go eat an entire d*ck sandwich.
victor809 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
It's dumb azz comments like this which make me certain our nation will not survive.

Look in the mirror, pal. Bernie is a socialist, by his own admission. And he's likely the dems best shot.

You can go eat an entire d*ck sandwich.


Well, at least we can agree the nation won't survive.

Bernie Sanders may call himself a socialist, but I haven't seen him once try to nationalize the means of production. He's been in congress how long?

The most "socialist" the democrats have gotten is to try to distribute tax money differently than the "capitalists".

Just because you don't know the definition of socialist, and just trust a politician to tell you who is/isn't isn't my fault.

You can go eat an entire digested and sh*t out d*ck sandwich.
teedubbya Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
yea the other party are all socialists and communists (per the orange one) and hate our country. its the only logical conclusion you can draw and isn't hyperbole or talking points at all.
pacman357 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
MACS wrote:
So... who would have guessed that ol' Pacman has TDS?

*raises hand*

Catchy. Original. Apparently I've given you too much credit over the years. Consider myself corrected on that issue.
victor809 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
Bernie is a socialist, by his own admission.


This seemed odd to me so I decided to look it up.

I don't see Sanders calling himself a socialist anywhere.

I do see him calling himself a Democratic Socialist.

This is hilarious, because a democratic socialist is not a socialist any more than a Nazi is a socialist.

It appears macs has fallen into the very common conservative trap of "it has the word in it so they must be the same!!!"

I know it's difficult. It has led him to classifying jellybeans as legumes, ponytails as equines and doggystyle as bestiality.

We should all pray for him.

And encourage him to eat two 10' party sized d$ck sandwiches.
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Pac TDS has become a catch phrase used to avoid actual thought. If you oppose anything it can't be because you think.... it's because you are sick therefore no more discussion is needed. It's a way to be lazy.

Its used much like some folks accuse the term racist as being used.
pacman357 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
Apparently I was a bit too subtle when I posted this. Of course I don't think we should shut down all social media. Well, maybe these forums (to those not able to grasp nuance, that is a joke).

It was a rant. I'm tired of listening to someone well into his 70's whine like an 8 year old who skinned his knee for the first time. I mean, look at the dipwad's twitter feed...praises Fox when it supports him, whines when it doesn't. Like it's his own personal network (it seems like it at times, but it is owned by someone else). He wants credit for stuff he hasn't done, then mewls like a wounded child when he doesn't feel enough love.

I'd love to have a president with an emotional level that at least reaches double digits. Better yet to also have one with an IQ that reaches into triple figures as well. Obama did some good things, but didn't exactly wow me. The past two GOP presidents do not have the intellectual power (combined) to light a 3 watt Christmas tree light bulb. Frankly, until we figure out a way to get someone who can get sh...tuff done, I don't hold much hope for future generations. We're on a planet that we're destroying, and we're not even up to the level of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. We're still arguing about whether deck chairs are appropriate, and what color they should be. But under Trump, we are just going backwards, and it won't be for years that we truly realize how much damage is being done while Trump's "Me First" attitude to everything is gone. Governing by Twitter has to be one of the worst ideas in the history of bad ideas, and hence the reason for my rant.

I'm starting to remember one of the reasons I left this forum for a while. Too many damned babies who cannot stand the idea that someone might have opinions different from their own, and rather than engaging in at least a semi-intelligent debate, just start ad hominem attacks and spouting brainless campaign slogans. Well-done. Pick up your idiot $3 trucker MAGA hats on the way out the door. Oh, and at some point, Google "sarcasm" and "political satire". Have mommy or daddy help if need be, or maybe your local librarian can show you how to use a puter.

Dynasties usually die not of homicide, but of suicide. I don't have kids, so I'm not going to bother fighting idiots to perpetuate their genes. You all drinking the Trump Kool-Aid can figure out how to apologize to your grandkids when and if you realize the damage being done in the U.S. and around the world,. My conscience is clear. Peace out.
teedubbya Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The forum right now reminds me very much of the GWB years right after we fabricated the WMD issue and invaded Iraq. The support of GW and that was intense in here and to question it was to be a lib. Most now have come around just like most will see this Admin for what it really is. It will just take awhile and in the mean time the other side is unpatriotic and hates this country.


Meh. History will not be kind.
MACS Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
Same tired group spouting the same tired sh*t.

PAC, I don't recall you ever giving me credit for anything. In fact, I recall you leaving because of disagreements. Pretty sure I got "unfriended" on another site due to political disagreements.

So either your memory is worse than mine... or mine's getting better?
opelmanta1900 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
History will never remember antifa as patriotic and it will never mistake social justice warriors for any form of defenders of our freedoms...
MACS Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
teedubbya wrote:
The forum right now reminds me very much of the GWB years right after we fabricated the WMD issue and invaded Iraq. The support of GW and that was intense in here and to question it was to be a lib. Most now have come around just like most will see this Admin for what it really is. It will just take awhile and in the mean time the other side is unpatriotic and hates this country.


Meh. History will not be kind.


LOL!! Another subject discussed at length. By the time we got in there they were mostly gone, and we still found some.
MACS Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,803
opelmanta1900 wrote:
History will never remember antifa as patriotic and it will never mistake social justice warriors for any form of defenders of our freedoms...


True... true... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
History will never remember antifa as patriotic and it will never mistake social justice warriors for any form of defenders of our freedoms...



I agree with you.... it's not mutually exclusive
teedubbya Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
MACS wrote:
LOL!! Another subject discussed at length. By the time we got in there they were mostly gone, and we still found some.



LOL yea right.... because a cousin of a cousin said so. It is pretty well documented what really happened.
victor809 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
History will never remember antifa or social justice warriors ...


FIFY.

They are reactionary and not even "groups". They will not be remembered.

The people and ideas they are opposing will likely be remembered.
teedubbya Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I just hope the blind allegiance doesn't get us in to another unnecessary war. This one could be worse.
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
I just hope the blind allegiance doesn't get us in to another unnecessary war. This one could be worse.


nonsense, trump already promised us it'll be over in 10 days and only kill 10MM people.

we've already got cbidders eager for it to happen in another thread.
teedubbya Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
but then he said he doesn't want that thus he's going another direction...... another have your cake and eat it too moment. He can now claim to be tough and not tough at the same time!
pacman357 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
MACS wrote:
Same tired group spouting the same tired sh*t.

PAC, I don't recall you ever giving me credit for anything. In fact, I recall you leaving because of disagreements. Pretty sure I got "unfriended" on another site due to political disagreements.

So either your memory is worse than mine... or mine's getting better?

I enjoyed discussion about cars and cigars with you. You served in the military, something I greatly appreciate and respect. Amidst all other commentary, I want to stress that last statement remains constant, and same goes for anyone else who served.

I largely stopped coming because (1) my health was just getting worse and worse, (2) I was depressed as hell about it, and it was hard to be sociable in that state, (3) despite our differences on some issues, I still liked and respected you, so that had nothing to do with it, (4) this place to me is like an alcoholic working in a distillery...coming to the boards, with my OCD and CAD is just playing with fire, (5) I went through a really tough time coming to grips with a doctor's mistake resulting in me becoming blind in one eye (I have filed a lawsuit over that now, but even 18 months after going blind in that eye, I'm still trying to adapt and cope), and (6) the general tenor of some of the commentators was just making this place less fun.

You can decide for yourself where that leaves our respective memories.
victor809 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
but then he said he doesn't want that thus he's going another direction...... another have your cake and eat it too moment. He can now claim to be tough and not tough at the same time!


Dammit... you mean he's not going to go the 10 days direction?

So we're going to have another 20 year war.

Thanks republicans.

Have we finished the other one yet?
teedubbya Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The issue is the other side hates america, are socialists, are racists etc. How can you pretend to respect someone when they are supporting the enemy, socialists, racists etc. It's one thing to see it in politics but becomes harder and harder to deal with it on a personal level when folks spew that crap in here. Its an interesting dilemma.... because I find myself losing respect for folks in here quite a bit lately and I don't like it. It's not my normal MO. remember I'm a fence post, you can disagree with me all you like. Folks have gotten way to dug in to some crazy nonsense.... on both sides...both sides And I'm sure some folks will accuse me of same.... and being a lib etc.... round and round
ZRX1200 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,620
^ yup.
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,620
I mean....you stinky libtard
teedubbya Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I thought you liked the smell of vinegar and smegma
tailgater Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
I thought you liked the smell of vinegar and smegma


That's my go to pick-up line.

opelmanta1900 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
victor809 wrote:
FIFY.

They are reactionary and not even "groups". They will not be remembered.

The people and ideas they are opposing will likely be remembered.

So Antifa won't be remembered but the proud boys will?
teedubbya Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
That's my go to pick-up line.




Mine too. I trademarked the flavor for kettle chips but it never took off
opelmanta1900 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
but then he said he doesn't want that thus he's going another direction...... another have your cake and eat it too moment. He can now claim to be tough and not tough at the same time!

Like speaking softly and carrying a big stick....
teedubbya Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
So Antifa won't be remembered but the proud boys will?



I think I differ on that. I suspect they will be remembered similar to the Klan and Malcom X
opelmanta1900 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
I think I differ on that. I suspect they will be remembered similar to the Klan and Malcom X

Who?
teedubbya Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Like speaking softly and carrying a big stick....



Um no. Trump doesn't know the meaning of speaking softly.
tailgater Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Mine too. I trademarked the flavor for kettle chips but it never took off


Try pork rinds.
I think they'll be more open minded.

victor809 Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
So Antifa won't be remembered but the proud boys will?


I think that's an accurate prediction.
But it's just a guess.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages1234>