engletl wrote:If the media accounts are true and he put the letter out in a blast to more than was needed AND skipped his chain of command...well, being removed from command is the s.o.p.
However, if that rear admiral was the "problem" that he felt warranted said actions, he should have at least minimized the # of recipients.
Either way he should have anticipated backlash. Hopefully his crew has his back of the rear admiral was the issue.
I will add that I am still trying to read through all the he said/they said and develop what a timeline of all the actions supposedly transpired.
Thank you sir. Similar here. I have to follow a chain of command or expect ramifications. Sometimes it is worth suffering the consequences others not.
I don’t know enough on this one. It just startles me to see the gap between senior leadership and/or the admin and the sailors who were praising him.