Kinda exposes the UN as useless.
So now that we know that (out loud), do we:
a. Form a coalition on our own and stand up for "right" in the face of "wrong" simply for the moral principles?
b. Form said coalition but secure some kind of favorable remuneration (natural resources, military bases, etc.) as a payment?
c. Sit back and let the events play out without intervening?
I know there are significant costs for "a" and "b" in both blood and treasure, but what about the costs of "c"?
I think everyone looks at WWII and says that millions of lives would have been saved if the US hadn't waited so long to join the efforts. Are we making the same mistake (obviously on a smaller scale) again?
I don't have answers (or my mind made up) yet, just wondering what any of you thought...