heeheeeheee..... they both have the same nose....

hee hee hee....

um.. I mean... D@MN our judicial system!!!

SteveS, I couldn't have said it better... Maybe he's guilty? Maybe she's just a b!tch. But don't just assume that because he's "who he is" that there's no way the former is true. It will be a very interesting trial...

very true, Robby ... he may well be guilty as charged ... through the miracle of satelite TV, I frequently see news on the Denver channels and as a result, am seeing even more coverage of this whole brouhaha than most and I know the DAs office there seems to think they're really onto something ... but this gal was no babe in the woods ... I've seen a lot of interviews with folks who know her and know of her. There is room for skepticism about stuff she says ...

The case really does ring a bell reminiscent of the OJ business ... everyone now says 'oh, what a slime-ball ... I knew all along he did it' ... as though no one remembers the 'slow chase' on the day of his arrest in which THOUSANDS were lined up along the way and on overpasses with signs saying 'go, Juice, go' and 'OJ, we're with you all the way' ... and people who wanna spit now when they say his name were, before the trial, saying 'oh, I just can't BELIEVE he did it ... OJ is SUCH a great guy' ...

In this case, as I said before, I could believe either of them is guilty ... there's no outcome I can think of that could possibly surprise me

SteveS

sorry chap. is your email "from steves" ?

if not ...anyway can you send me the channel number for the denver station and the name of the station also. please.