rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:35:00 AM

Add Up the Damage

By BOB HERBERT

Published: December 29, 2008

Does anyone know where George W. Bush is?

Skip to next paragraph

Bob Herbert

Go to Columnist Page » Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

Read All Comments (702) »

You don’t hear much from him anymore. The last image most of us remember is of the president ducking a pair of size 10s that were hurled at him in Baghdad.

We’re still at war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Israel is thrashing the Palestinians in Gaza. And the U.S. economy is about as vibrant as the 0-16 Detroit Lions.

But hardly a peep have we heard from George, the 43rd.

When Mr. Bush officially takes his leave in three weeks (in reality, he checked out long ago), most Americans will be content to sigh good riddance. I disagree. I don’t think he should be allowed to slip quietly out of town. There should be a great hue and cry — a loud, collective angry howl, demonstrations with signs and bullhorns and fiery speeches — over the damage he’s done to this country.

This is the man who gave us the war in Iraq and Guantánamo and torture and rendition; who turned the Clinton economy and the budget surplus into fool’s gold; who dithered while New Orleans drowned; who trampled our civil liberties at home and ruined our reputation abroad; who let ****** Cheney run hog wild and thought Brownie was doing a heckuva job.

The Bush administration specialized in deceit. How else could you get the public (and a feckless Congress) to go along with an invasion of Iraq as an absolutely essential response to the Sept. 11 attacks, when Iraq had had nothing to do with the Sept. 11 attacks?

Exploiting the public’s understandable fears, Mr. Bush made it sound as if Iraq was about to nuke us: “We cannot wait,” he said, “for the final proof — the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.”

He then set the blaze that has continued to rage for nearly six years, consuming more than 4,000 American lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. (A car bomb over the weekend killed two dozen more Iraqis, many of them religious pilgrims.) The financial cost to the U.S. will eventually reach $3 trillion or more, according to the Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz.

A year into the war Mr. Bush was cracking jokes about it at the annual dinner of the Radio and Television Correspondents Association. He displayed a series of photos that showed him searching the Oval Office, peering behind curtains and looking under the furniture. A mock caption had Mr. Bush saying: “Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere.”

And then there’s the Bush economy, another disaster, a trapdoor through which middle-class Americans can plunge toward the bracing experiences normally reserved for the poor and the destitute.

Mr. Bush traveled the country in the early days of his presidency, promoting his tax cut plans as hugely beneficial to small-business people and families of modest means. This was more deceit. The tax cuts would go overwhelmingly to the very rich.

The president would give the wealthy and the powerful virtually everything they wanted. He would throw sand into the regulatory apparatus and help foster the most extreme income disparities since the years leading up to the Great Depression. Once again he was lighting a fire. This time the flames would engulf the economy and, as with Iraq, bring catastrophe.

If the U.S. were a product line, it would be seen now as deeply damaged goods, subject to recall.

There seemed to be no end to Mr. Bush’s talent for destruction. He tried to hand the piggy bank known as Social Security over to the marauders of the financial sector, but saner heads prevailed.

In New Orleans, the president failed to intervene swiftly and decisively to aid the tens of thousands of poor people who were very publicly suffering and, in many cases, dying. He then compounded this colossal failure of leadership by traveling to New Orleans and promising, in a dramatic, floodlit appearance, to spare no effort in rebuilding the flood-torn region and the wrecked lives of the victims.

He went further, vowing to confront the issue of poverty in America “with bold action.”

It was all nonsense, of course. He did nothing of the kind.

The catalog of his transgressions against the nation’s interests — sins of commission and omission — would keep Mr. Bush in a confessional for the rest of his life. Don’t hold your breath. He’s hardly the contrite sort.

He told ABC’s Charlie Gibson: “I don’t spend a lot of time really worrying about short-term history. I guess I don’t worry about long-term history, either, since I’m not going to be around to read it.”

The president chuckled, thinking — as he did when he made his jokes about the missing weapons of mass destruction — that there was something funny going on.

andytv
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:38:00 AM
hater!!
pacman357
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:47:00 AM
Living proof that ignorance is bliss. For the ignorant one, at least.
DrafterX
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:50:00 AM
^ BOB HERBERT?
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:56:00 AM
Almost makes me want to throw my shoes at him.
cbc812
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:18:00 AM
Worst. President. Ever.
usahog
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 5:39:00 AM
OH FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!

We Ain't Seen Nothin YET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Momma, We Ain't seen Nothin YET!

jpotts
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:24:00 AM
"And then there’s the Bush economy, another disaster, a trapdoor through which middle-class Americans can plunge toward the bracing experiences normally reserved for the poor and the destitute."

Funny.

Only a couple of years ago we had an economic boom - 5% unemployment, DOW at all time highs.

Never read "history" written in the present day.

The same people pointing fingers at people like me and asking, "you just can't over Clinton, can you?" are now the ones doing the same thing with Bush.

Not that this wasn't expected. I'm expecting at least another 4 years of the wailing and moaning over "Bush" when the seeds of this "New Great Depression" (which is a total crock) were actually planted back more than 40 years ago.

Keep electing people like Barney Frank. It's served us SO well up till now...

donutboy2000
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:29:00 AM
#3

rfenst is not ignorant, just a left wing nut job.

bloody spaniard
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:34:00 AM
Businesses began to tank & struggle after 9/11 and Dubya just helped it along with tighter restrictions and less competitive bidding. Goodby open market. Hello one world.

Not much we can do now. (shaking head & shrugging shoulders)

topper7788
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:36:00 AM
Potts,

It's taken a lot to get me to say this...

BUT I am counting the days till Bush is gone....

AND hoping for a CHANGE... Heck if Obama gets this country moving again, I'll be voting for the first Democrat since the 1970's... I hate to admit it but as a kid I voted for Carter! (once)

chiefburg
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:54:00 AM
While some of the article is true, much is crap as well. Torture started by Bush? No. It's been going on for centuries. Has the U.S. tortured people before Bush? Absolutely and much more so than Bush ever did! Prison camp on Cuba - is this new? Hell no. Look at what we did to the Japanese during WWII - 1000 times worse than Bush. Economy better under Clinton? On the surface, yes. Underneath the surface? No. In fact, it's Clinton policies and programs that put us where we are today. Bush isn't the first President to put us into war. Have we forgot about Korea and Vietnam? Look how those vets were treated by the American public. Have we forgotten the protesting? The riots? While war is never good, we've been put through so much worse for a lot less.

I don't mind the Bush bashing if it's accurate and deserved. And, frankly, I'm ready to see him go as much as the next guy. But please let's not forget our history. The American public is so short sighted most of the time. Carter did his damage. Clinton did some serious damage that didn't show for years and we are paying for it now.

In many respects, Bush is no different than half the Presidents we've had.

A one-sided article from an obvious liberal doesn't mean too much to me.

rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:07:00 AM
It meant enough to stimulate your participation in this discussion, didn't it?
bloody spaniard
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:13:00 AM
We THRIVED under slick willy & a Republican congress.

That's NOT anecdotal. Just ask most people with small businesses.

What we have now is a nincompoop with grandiose ideas about introducing democracy in ****holes that couldn't care less about anything but our greenbacks & one who obviously had little understanding of the business world and what made it work so well for EVERYONE. When he entered office he had a track record of nothing but failed business ventures with the exception of the buyout shenanigans he had orchestrated for him.

IMHO, a buffoon in the right place at the right time who did the wrong thing.

And I supported and voted for him & his dad at least through the first fiasco.

JonR
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:16:00 AM
Youse demoncrats take your last shots at G.W., because for we Republicans 1/20/09 is obama time for four freakin years.

JonR

PS: And if obama doesn't honor every campaign promise he made there will be hell to pay, hell to pay I tell you!

bloody spaniard
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:22:00 AM
^ You sound like you're bringing hell with you, Wyatt.
DrafterX
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:23:00 AM
interesting, looking back... never had a jack-booted thug kick in my door or had to show papers to cross state lines as predicted... not sure about the phone taps tho....
calavera
Wednesday, December 31, 2008 10:00:00 AM
yawn