jade,
appart from doing Rick's homework we haven't heard your commentary on the article.
I did read it, and regardless of who printed it you don't need to get past the first paragraph to know that the author himself is completely biased.
Then, later in the article he equates a government employee with a welfare recipient.
This is wrong on so many levels that it's not even funny.
The guy he spoke to actually "works" for his governement paycheck and yet he compares it to receiving a welfare check by those who do nothing to earn it.
The fact that you posted this link poses the assumption that you agree with the author and therefore with his backwards logic.
I'm not surprised, but it still merits a "wow".
tailgater wrote: