donutboy2000
15 years ago


The anti-war movement was all over the news before President Obama was elected. But apparently they weren’t really anti-war ... they were just anti-President Bush. Two college professors just released a study of national protests between 2007 and 2009. What did they find?
… After January 2007, the attendance at antiwar rallies [measured in] roughly the tens of thousands, or thousands, through the end of 2008.
… After the election of Barack Obama as president, the order of magnitude of antiwar protests dropped [...] Organizers were hard pressed to stage a rally with participation in the thousands, or even in the hundreds. For example, we counted exactly 107 participants at a Chicago rally on October 7, 2009.
Amazing. Especially because the war in Afghanistan ramped up after Obama was elected. American fatalities shot up in 2009 and 2010.
The protesters have remained silent over Libya.
And I’m struck by the hypocrisy of the supposedly “anti-war” politicians who voted against Iraq, like Nancy Pelosi. Since Obama was elected, she has voted to continue the war in Afghanistan … and supported the attack on Libya.
Only a handful of Congressmen have remained principled on foreign intervention. One of them is Ron Paul.


John Stossel
jpotts
15 years ago
Anti-war fatigue?
robertknyc
15 years ago
Whatever happened to Cindy Sheehan? Where are the media chasing down lone anti-war protesters and featuring them as big news?
jpotts
15 years ago

Whatever happened to Cindy Sheehan? Where are the media chasing down lone anti-war protesters and featuring them as big news?

robertknyc wrote:



She served her purpose. Then when she got uppity and tried to push Nancy (buttsucker) Pelosi out of her seat, she got shown the door.

Life sucks when you're a liberal and don't quite know where your place is.
jackconrad
15 years ago
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") They are moving into holes all over the place! Took all my carrots and drank all my tuba wine !
ZRX1200
15 years ago
They are busy at union ralleys now.....Soros astroturf.
DadZilla3
15 years ago

And I’m struck by the hypocrisy of the supposedly “anti-war” politicians who voted against Iraq, like Nancy Pelosi. Since Obama was elected, she has voted to continue the war in Afghanistan … and supported the attack on Libya.

donutboy2000 wrote:


It's nothing more than typical liberal doublespeak. Where is NOW with their shrill criticism of the Neanderthal treatment of women by fundamentalist Muslims? Where is the liberal media's condemnation of the current administration's disconnect between his campaign rhetoric and his post-election agenda?

Liberals have no use for a moral compass. It would inhibit their ability to spin madly in every direction, on every issue.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
.



WHIRLING DERVISH

OUTRAGE!!!
Stinkdyr
15 years ago
You silly Republitards.........don't you realize?

2 wars are bad.........but 3 wars are good! (if a Demican is in office)


🇨🇮
DrafterX
15 years ago
Where Did All the Anti-War Protesters Go?



it's not cool anymore... 😟
none of them really knew why they were protesting in the first place...
daveincincy
15 years ago


Liberals have no use for a moral compass. It would inhibit their ability to spin madly in every direction, on every issue.

DadZilla3 wrote:




I agree. Fuzz said that democrats are poor organizers. I guess it's hard to organize/come together when a person becomes selfish and lacks any moral guidance. As the saying goes, "if you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything." ...people just looking for something to stand for, but actually falling for anything.

edit: oh, look...Fuzz is currently viewing this thread. 😰
FuzzNJ
15 years ago
It's true, and sad. There have been several actual protests, but the attendance is pathetic.

The same can be said in reverse about the tea party. They formed only after Obama was elected and taxes are at there lowest in 50 years, and the national debt has been a problem for much longer than 2 years.
MCAddict
15 years ago
There all scattered about at burials of fallen soldiers.
snowwolf777
15 years ago
They're gone because Bush is gone. As soon as these became "Obama's Wars" they became OK. Same locations. Same enemies. But we have changed the missions to ones of high moral purpose, instead of fighting for oil.

I mean, we're just primarily shooting foam darts and givin' em all a good talkin' to now. Not like people are dying or anything.

Besides, he's too busy investigating the high cost of gasoline to worry about a couple of wars and some police actions here and there. Vote present and move on. Somehow, someway, Bush and Cheney have managed to get the cost of gasoline sky-high again to line their pockets, even with our great protector in the White House.

[sarcasm]

snowwolf777
15 years ago
👍

They are busy at union ralleys now.....Soros astroturf.

ZRX1200 wrote:


donutboy2000
15 years ago

... taxes are at there lowest in 50 years, ....

FuzzNJ wrote:





Federal taxes, State taxes, Corporate taxes, Sales Taxes, Use Taxes, Capital Gains taxes, Social security taxes, self employment taxes, death taxes....?

Which taxes are the lowest in 50 years?
DadZilla3
15 years ago

The same can be said in reverse about the tea party. They formed only after Obama was elected and taxes are at there lowest in 50 years, and the national debt has been a problem for much longer than 2 years.

FuzzNJ wrote:



OK, a show of hands...who can say "I am truly grateful to president Obama and the liberals for lowering my taxes" without laughing hysterically, or projectile vomiting?
wheelrite
15 years ago

OK, a show of hands...who can say "I am truly grateful to president Obama and the liberals for lowering my taxes" without laughing hysterically, or projectile vomiting?

DadZilla3 wrote:



Fuzz is on the Deck of the SS Liberal, the band is playing and he can't get on a Life Boat unless he puts on a dress...


wheel,,
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

OK, a show of hands...who can say "I am truly grateful to president Obama and the liberals for lowering my taxes" without laughing hysterically, or projectile vomiting?

DadZilla3 wrote:



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/us/politics/19taxes.html 

What if a president cut Americans’ income taxes by $116 billion and nobody noticed?

It is not a rhetorical question. At Pig Pickin’ and Politickin’, a barbecue-fed rally organized here last week by a Republican women’s club, a half-dozen guests were asked by a reporter what had happened to their taxes since President Obama took office.

“Federal and state have both gone up,” said Bob Paratore, 59, from nearby Charlotte, echoing the comments of others.

After further prodding — including a reminder that a provision of the stimulus bill had cut taxes for 95 percent of working families by changing withholding rates — Mr. Paratore’s memory was jogged.

“You’re right, you’re right,” he said. “I’ll be honest with you: it was so subtle that personally, I didn’t notice it.”

Few people apparently did.

In a troubling sign for Democrats as they head into the midterm elections, their signature tax cut of the past two years, which decreased income taxes by up to $400 a year for individuals and $800 for married couples, has gone largely unnoticed.

In a New York Times/CBS News Poll last month, fewer than one in 10 respondents knew that the Obama administration had lowered taxes for most Americans. Half of those polled said they thought that their taxes had stayed the same, a third thought that their taxes had gone up, and about a tenth said they did not know. As Thom Tillis, a Republican state representative, put it as the dinner wound down here, “This was the tax cut that fell in the woods — nobody heard it.”
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Federal taxes, State taxes, Corporate taxes, Sales Taxes, Use Taxes, Capital Gains taxes, Social security taxes, self employment taxes, death taxes....?

Which taxes are the lowest in 50 years?

donutboy2000 wrote:



U.S. Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History, 1913-2011

http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html 
Users browsing this topic