wheelrite
Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:28:47 AM

Is the Pretribulation Rapture Biblical?

Brian M. Schwertley

One of the most popular teachings today in Evangelical and Charismatic churches is the doctrine of the pretribulation rapture. The pretribulation rapture teaching is that there are two separate comings of Christ. The first coming is secret and occurs before the future seven year tribulation. At this coming Jesus comes for the saints (i.e., all genuine believers) both living and dead. These saints meet the Lord in the air and then are taken to heaven to escape the horrible judgments that take place during the seven year tribulation. At the end of the great tribulation Jesus returns to the earth with the saints. This coming is not secret but is observed by all. At this coming Christ crushes His opposition, judges mankind and sets up a one thousand year reign of saints upon the earth (the millennium). Some pretribulation advocates speak of two separate comings while others prefer to speak of one coming in two separate stages or phases (phase one is the secret rapture and phase two is the visible coming in judgment). Hal Lindsey likes to refer to the rapture as “the great snatch.” He writes: “The word for ‘caught up’ actually means to ‘snatch up,’ and that’s why I like to call this marvelous coming event ‘The Great Snatch’! It’s usually referred to as the ‘Rapture,’ from the Latin word rapere, which means to ‘take away’ or ‘snatch out.’”1

Although the pretribulation rapture doctrine is very popular and is even considered so crucial to Christianity that it is made a test of a person’s orthodoxy in some denominations, Bible colleges and seminaries, the exegetical and theological arguments used by its advocates are all classic cases of forcing one’s theological presuppositions onto particular texts (eisegesis). The purpose of this brief study is to show that the pretribulation rapture theory is not plainly taught or directly stated in any place in Scripture, cannot be deduced from biblical teaching, contradicts the general teaching of the Bible regarding Christ’s second coming and was never taught in any branch of the church prior to 1830.

The Origin of the Pretribulation Rapture Teaching

Whenever a Christian encounters a doctrine that has not been taught by anyone in any branch of Christ’s church for over eighteen centuries, one should be very suspect of that teaching. This fact in and of itself does not prove that the new teaching is false. But, it should definitely raise one’s suspicions, for if something is taught in Scripture, it is not unreasonable to expect at least a few theologians and exegetes to have discovered it before. The teaching of a secret pretribulation rapture is a doctrine that never existed before 1830. Did the pretribulation rapture come into existence by a careful exegesis of Scripture? No. The first person to teach the doctrine was a young woman named Margaret Macdonald. Margaret was not a theologian or Bible expositor but was a prophetess in the Irvingite sect (the Catholic Apostolic Church). Christian journalist Dave MacPherson has written a book on the subject of the origin of the pre-tribulation rapture. He writes: “We have seen that a young Scottish lassie named Margaret Macdonald had a private revelation in Port Glasgow, Scotland, in the early part of 1830 that a select group of Christians would be caught up to meet Christ in the air before the days of Antichrist. An eye-and-ear witness, Robert Norton M.D., preserved her handwritten account of her pre-trib rapture revelation in two of his books, and said it was the first time anyone ever split the second coming into two distinct parts or stages. His writings, along with much other Catholic Apostolic Church literature, have been hidden many decades from the mainstream of Evangelical thought and only recently surfaced. Margaret’s views were well-known to those who visited her home, among them John Darby of the Brethren. Within a few months her distinctive prophetic outlook was mirrored in the September, 1830 issue of The Morning Watch and the early Brethren assembly at Plymouth, England. Early disciples of the pre-trib interpretation often called it a new doctrine.”2

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882), who was the leader of the Brethren movement and the “father of modern Dispensationalism,” took Margaret Macdonald’s new teaching on the rapture, made some changes (she taught a partial rapture of believers while he taught that all believers would be raptured) and incorporated it into his Dispensational understanding of Scripture and prophecy. Darby would spend the rest of his life speaking, writing and traveling, spreading the new rapture theory. The Plymouth Brethren openly admitted and were even proud of the fact that among their teachings were totally new ones which had never been taught by the church fathers, medieval scholastics, Protestant Reformers or the many commentators.

The person most responsible for the rather widespread acceptance of Pretribulationalism and Dispensationalism among Evangelicals is Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921). C. I. Scofield published his Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. This Bible, which espoused the doctrines of Darby in its notes, became very popular in Fundamentalist circles. In the minds of many a Bible teacher, fundamentalist pastor and multitudes of professing Christians, Scofield’s notes were practically equated with the word of God itself. If a person did not adhere to the Dispensational, Pretribulational scheme he or she would almost automatically be labeled a modernist.

Today there is a whole plethora of books advocating the pretribulation rapture theory and the Dispensational understanding of the end times. Given the fact that among professing Christians the pre-trib rapture is still wildly popular, a comparison of this theory with scriptural teaching is warranted

HockeyDad
Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:38:19 AM

Although the pretribulation rapture doctrine is very popular and is even considered so crucial to Christianity that it is made a test of a person’s orthodoxy in some denominations

wheelrite wrote:

Later the article also says it is "wildly popular".

Popular perhaps from the standpoint of making the news every time someone tries to "call his shot" and predict the dates. The reality still is that rapture doctrine is still only a minority viewpoint across Christianity. Describing it as popular may be overstating things a bit.

wheelrite
Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:43:50 AM

Later the article also says it is "wildly popular".

Popular perhaps from the standpoint of making the news every time someone tries to "call his shot" and predict the dates. The reality still is that rapture doctrine is still only a minority viewpoint across Christianity. Describing it as popular may be overstating things a bit.

HockeyDad wrote:

Our best friends are Catholics that joined a Mega Baptist Evangelical Church here in Dallas.Last evening while drinking and eating at Jimmy Buffett the Rapture topic came up.I said that pre-trib rapture is a misnomer and that it is not in the Bible.They got all pissy .So,I forwarded this article to her this morning,before they go to church.

HockeyDad
Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:53:15 AM
I wonder how many evangelicals are calling all their friends today trying to figure out if they were "left behind" or the date was just wrong.
wheelrite
Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:59:38 AM

I wonder how many evangelicals are calling all their friends today trying to figure out if they were "left behind" or the date was just wrong.

HockeyDad wrote:

My buddy says he sees many of their church members at Bars on saturday night,drinking and dancing..

DaQueenBeez
Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:19:25 AM

My buddy says he sees many of their church members at Bars on saturday night,drinking and dancing..

wheelrite wrote:

You know, I was raised Southern Baptist, and I never understood those taboos. Jesus, Himself, turned water into wine, and David - "a man after God's own heart," - REALLY had his boogie on. Sometimes you wonder - do people actually READ their Bibles and verify what's being spouted, or do they take the whole "be like sheep" bit a little too much to heart?

JadeRose
Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:19:51 AM
Religion is for suckers. One does not need to sit in a special building or even read the words written by men to be at peace with one's God.
wheelrite
Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:26:44 AM

Religion is for suckers. One does not need to sit in a special building or even read the words written by men to be at peace with one's God.

JadeRose wrote:

a valid point,,,,

good morning ya homo

daveincincy
Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:52:30 AM

You know, I was raised Southern Baptist, and I never understood those taboos. Jesus, Himself, turned water into wine, and David - "a man after God's own heart," - REALLY had his boogie on. Sometimes you wonder - do people actually READ their Bibles and verify what's being spouted, or do they take the whole "be like sheep" bit a little too much to heart?

DaQueenBeez wrote:

No, they do not. They rely on their priest, pastor, minister, etc to tell them the TRUTH. Many priest and pastors [literally] bank on the fact their members don't read/study the bible OR have a closer relationship with Christ...for them it means job security. Pastors love to teach John 3:16, "for God so loved the world..." But they teach it in a condemning way, so they wouldn't want to read verse 17, "God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world.." and they hope the congregation doesn't pick up on it because it just blows their whole ministry out of the water.

daveincincy
Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:55:12 AM

My buddy says he sees many of their church members at Bars on saturday night,drinking and dancing..

wheelrite wrote:

But as long as they go to church on Sunday it's cool, right? [sarcasm] Fire insurance sold every Sunday. 🤥