Break out the tar and feathers and stocks...it's past due.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

So seeking an ambiguous answer rather than an absolute answer is analytical?

So you like the hunt more than the kill......

I like both.

ZRX1200 wrote:

I would also add the inability to properly understand and/or the deliberate misrepresentation of another person's opinions or statements.

FuzzNJ wrote:

Actually, I don’t think ZR’s comments are ether. He was simply saying that he agreed – in an ambiguously analytical way.

And that hunt’n is fun, just like kill’n. Odd sort of comment I thought . . . . .

Brewha wrote:

What a crock,,,

They studied "Young Adults"
Most young adults,18-32 are apolitical and most lean to the left bcause they have'nt had to pay outrageous taxes and deal with other gov't bull chit...

I'm sure this study was funded by a Liberal Think Tank,,,

wheelrite wrote:

In a vain attempt to dispel the ambiguity I have introduced;
I know many people who are uncomfortable with the fact that there are some things we will never know, or that the truth of a situation depends on your point of view. They insist on absolute answers – insisting that there is no room for interpretation;

Why are we here? Lots of answers on this one – no tangible proof. But it is very telling if a person approaches it as “no one really knows” or “there is only one answer”.

“Never believe your doubts and never doubt your believes” is a phrase that epitomizes conservative thinking.

“The truth is mutable” would be the liberal slant.

Brewha wrote:

Just wow.

No faith in your world?

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Lots of faith in my world. Faith is good. So is a questioning mind.

Yes – you can have faith and still ask questions. After all, you can’t really have faith, until you admit you don’t know.

Brewha wrote: