Kawak
  • Kawak
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
15 years ago
For the past thirty years, David Mamet has been a controversial and defining force in theater and film, championing the most cherished liberal values along the way. In some of the great movies and plays of our time, his characters have explored the ethics of the business world, embodied the struggles of the oppressed, and faced the flaws of the capitalist system.

But in recent years Mamet has had a change of heart. He realized that the so- called mainstream media outlets he relied on were irredeemably biased, peddling a hypocritical and deeply flawed worldview. In 2008 he wrote a hugely controversial op-ed for The Village Voice, "Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain- Dead Liberal,'" in which he methodically eviscerated liberal beliefs. Now he goes much deeper, employing his trademark intellectual force and vigor to take on all the key political and cultural issues of our times, from religion to political correctness to global warming. A sample:

The problems facing us, faced by all mankind engaged in Democracy, may seem complex, or indeed insolvable, and we, in despair, may revert to a state of wish fulfillment-a state of "belief" in the power of the various experts presenting themselves as a cure for our indecision. But this is a sort of Stockholm Syndrome. Here, the captives, unable to bear the anxiety occasioned by their powerlessness, suppress it by identifying with their captors.

This is the essence of Leftist thought. It is a devolution from reason to "belief," in an effort to stave off a feeling of powerlessness. And if government is Good, it is a logical elaboration that more government power is Better. But the opposite is apparent both to anyone who has ever had to deal with Government and, I think, to any dispassionate observer.

FuzzNJ
15 years ago
So was he healed by the blood of Ayn?
wheelrite
15 years ago
The Liberal commie homo disease is easy to understand...

Lazy phucks that want me to pay their way...


no need to write a book...
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

The Liberal commie homo disease is easy to understand...

Lazy phucks that want me to pay their way...


no need to write a book...

wheelrite wrote:




This is the word of the Lord, Ayn Rand.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
FuzzNJ is a captive to ideology.
wheelrite
15 years ago

This is the word of the Lord, Ayn Rand.

FuzzNJ wrote:



as opposed to Marx?

:-"
Kawak
  • Kawak
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
15 years ago

FuzzNJ is a captive to ideology.

HockeyDad wrote:



“I never questioned my tribal assumption that Capitalism was bad,” he writes now, “although I, simultaneously, never acted upon these feelings.” He was always happy to cash a royalty check and made sure to insist on a licensing fee. “I supported myself, as do all those not on the government dole, through the operation of the Free Market.”

He saw he was Talking Left and Living Right, a condition common among American liberals, particularly the wealthy among them, who can, for instance, want to impose diversity requirements on private companies while living in monochromatic neighborhoods, or vote against school vouchers while sending their kids to prep school, or shelter their income while advocating higher tax rates. The widening gap between liberal politics and liberal life became real to him when, paradoxically enough, he decided at last to write a political play, or rather a play about politics. It was the first time he thought about partisan politics for any sustained period
wheelrite
15 years ago

“I never questioned my tribal assumption that Capitalism was bad,” he writes now, “although I, simultaneously, never acted upon these feelings.” He was always happy to cash a royalty check and made sure to insist on a licensing fee. “I supported myself, as do all those not on the government dole, through the operation of the Free Market.”

He saw he was Talking Left and Living Right, a condition common among American liberals, particularly the wealthy among them, who can, for instance, want to impose diversity requirements on private companies while living in monochromatic neighborhoods, or vote against school vouchers while sending their kids to prep school, or shelter their income while advocating higher tax rates. The widening gap between liberal politics and liberal life became real to him when, paradoxically enough, he decided at last to write a political play, or rather a play about politics. It was the first time he thought about partisan politics for any sustained period

Kawak wrote:



They all know deep down,They're shallow ,self absobred morons...
HockeyDad
15 years ago

They all know deep down,They're shallow ,self absobred morons...

wheelrite wrote:




...but they mean well.
tweoijfoi
15 years ago
It's a real self-affirming circle in here... to put it nicely.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

“I never questioned my tribal assumption that Capitalism was bad,” he writes now, “although I, simultaneously, never acted upon these feelings.” He was always happy to cash a royalty check and made sure to insist on a licensing fee. “I supported myself, as do all those not on the government dole, through the operation of the Free Market.”

He saw he was Talking Left and Living Right, a condition common among American liberals, particularly the wealthy among them, who can, for instance, want to impose diversity requirements on private companies while living in monochromatic neighborhoods, or vote against school vouchers while sending their kids to prep school, or shelter their income while advocating higher tax rates. The widening gap between liberal politics and liberal life became real to him when, paradoxically enough, he decided at last to write a political play, or rather a play about politics. It was the first time he thought about partisan politics for any sustained period

Kawak wrote:



lol, so being a Republican means living in monochromatic neighborhoods, sending their kids to private prep schools, less diversity and sheltering their income?

You guys are using him as an example of someone who has seen the light when these are all Republican stereotypes of rich white guys that he, as a liberal, was doing? Might as well become a republican, I'm acting like one.

But the majority of republicans are not rich white guys, yet they vote for the party that protects them, not the working men and women like them, all on the hopes that someday, just maybe someday if I work hard enough, they too can be just like them.

You won't.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

lol, so being a Republican means living in monochromatic neighborhoods, sending their kids to private prep schools, less diversity and sheltering their income?

You guys are using him as an example of someone who has seen the light when these are all Republican stereotypes of rich white guys that he, as a liberal, was doing? Might as well become a republican, I'm acting like one.

But the majority of republicans are not rich white guys, yet they vote for the party that protects them, not the working men and women like them, all on the hopes that someday, just maybe someday if I work hard enough, they too can be just like them.

You won't.

FuzzNJ wrote:




More gobblety-gook from the resident homemaker.[frypan]
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

More gobblety-gook from the resident homemaker.[frypan]

DrMaddVibe wrote:




lmao. Keep voting against your own interest. You can keep whining and complaining then.
daveincincy
15 years ago
It makes sense, but it's not just a "liberal" disease. It's a political disease...right, left, dem, rep, etc. It's also a social disease...rich, poor, white, black, etc. It's also a "religion" disease...catholic, prodestant, lutheran, jewish, muslim, etc. People don't know who they are and attach themselves to a group in the hopes of some sort of affirmation.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

lmao. Keep voting against your own interest. You can keep whining and complaining then.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Yeah..voting for the Dems is really in my better interest. Let's just pile on more debt and crush the system monetarily instead of a violent revolution like the Marxists want...yeaaaa!

Make some cookies...maybe you're good at that.

Because here...you're THE joke.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

It makes sense, but it's not just a "liberal" disease. It's a political disease...right, left, dem, rep, etc. It's also a social disease...rich, poor, white, black, etc. It's also a "religion" disease...catholic, prodestant, lutheran, jewish, muslim, etc. People don't know who they are and attach themselves to a group in the hopes of some sort of affirmation.

daveincincy wrote:




Yet when people stand up for themselves they get labeled as racists or intolerant.

Damned if you do...damned if you don't.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Yeah..voting for the Dems is really in my better interest. Let's just pile on more debt and crush the system monetarily instead of a violent revolution like the Marxists want...yeaaaa!

Make some cookies...maybe you're good at that.

Because here...you're THE joke.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



They both suck, it's just that one party's policies work slightly better for the working class. The Democratic party is way to conservative now as they have moved to the right. A revolution, violent or not, is not out of the question because at no time in our history has more wealth been controlled by so few. This has started scores of revolutions before.

How many wall st. executives responsible for the melt down are in jail? You know, the guys who lost your pensions, 401k's, retirement accounts and nearly sent the entire world into a depression? The guys who because of their greed and gambling will force most of us to work longer, for less pay. The same guys who want to take over your Social Security money. One. Madoff, and why? Because he stole from the rich.

All the rest got bailed out with money from the very people they stole from. Now not only have we lost retirement money, we need to pay more taxes for the bailout. But suggest that the people who made all the money and have all the money pay a little more in taxes and it's like the world is going to end. And people, who are living paycheck to paycheck defend them! It's insanity.

And see how I ignored the personal insults?
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Yet when people stand up for themselves they get labeled as racists or intolerant.

Damned if you do...damned if you don't.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



lmao, so stupid.

Sounds like a white supremacist saying he doesn't hate black people, he just loves white people.

If it's racist or intolerant, it is. Has nothing to do with standing up for yourself.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

They both suck, it's just that one party's policies work slightly better for the working class. The Democratic party is way to conservative now as they have moved to the right. A revolution, violent or not, is not out of the question because at no time in our history has more wealth been controlled by so few. This has started scores of revolutions before.

How many wall st. executives responsible for the melt down are in jail? You know, the guys who lost your pensions, 401k's, retirement accounts and nearly sent the entire world into a depression? The guys who because of their greed and gambling will force most of us to work longer, for less pay. The same guys who want to take over your Social Security money. One. Madoff, and why? Because he stole from the rich.

All the rest got bailed out with money from the very people they stole from. Now not only have we lost retirement money, we need to pay more taxes for the bailout. But suggest that the people who made all the money and have all the money pay a little more in taxes and it's like the world is going to end. And people, who are living paycheck to paycheck defend them! It's insanity.

FuzzNJ wrote:




and YOU defend those policies! You think and still do that it was the government's role to bailout and buyout Wall Street.

No, you don't get to change your tune now Rachael Ray.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

lmao, so stupid.

Sounds like a white supremacist saying he doesn't hate black people, he just loves white people.

If it's racist or intolerant, it is. Has nothing to do with standing up for yourself.

FuzzNJ wrote:




See what I mean Dave?

It's like some warped Pavlovian experiment.[whip]
Users browsing this topic