now thats the million $ question huh?
although im not suprised at the gross ineffectiveness of our legal system, it does show the decline of our culture. maybe she didnt kill the baby directly but none of us could actually take our dead child and leave its body in the woods to be gnawed on, then go party it up for a month. we just couldnt. it's incomprehensible to us.
my one question to the jurors who believe she didnt kill her....... why would you put duct tape over the mouth of a child who is already dead?
all the individual pieces dont look like much, just like a puzzle but when you fit them all together, the big picture is clear...from the top of my head..
googled chloroform before child went missing, chloroform in car, cadaver dogs picking up scent in yard and car, testimony from several individuals including seasoned officers about cadaver smells in car, decomp bugs/chemicals in trunk, duct tape on mouth (and hands i think?) of body, body was left with blankets from the house, duct tape was unique/rare brand that was also found at house, not reporting her missing, partying, lying about nanny, the list goes on and on........
maybe there is no clear answer as to how she died but either
A. casey killed her and took her out there or
B. she died at the house in an accident and then she took her out there but the duct tape on the mouth kills that theory in my mind.
Papachristou wrote: