DrMaddVibe
14 years ago
[frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

[frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]

DrMaddVibe wrote:


yeah, that's an intelligent response.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago
and DMV is ahead of Hockeydad by 73 posts, but he's pretty much going for volume, not quality
FuzzNJ
14 years ago
Conservatives want you to believe that if we don't give the wealthy more money they will be lose their incentive to work while at the same time argue that giving money to the poor will cause them to lose their incentive to work. Sh*t you gotta believe if you are a republican.
Brewha
14 years ago

and DMV is ahead of Hockeydad by 73 posts, but he's pretty much going for volume, not quality

pdxstogieman wrote:



Lieutenant Le HockeyDad is impersonating an officer, as he is really a fascist puppet of the dictator elite.

DMV is – well, what can I say . . . . . . .
[frypan] ?
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Conservatives want you to believe that if we don't give the wealthy more money they will be lose their incentive to work while at the same time argue that giving money to the poor will cause them to lose their incentive to work. Sh*t you gotta believe if you are a republican.

FuzzNJ wrote:





I didn't know that giving more money to the wealthy was even on the table. Are we talking just the top 1% or the whole upper class (top 20%)?

One of the problems with giving more money to anyone is that you first have to take it from someone else.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Lieutenant Le HockeyDad is impersonating an officer, as he is really a fascist puppet of the dictator elite.

Brewha wrote:




What's your point?
wheelrite
14 years ago

What's your point?

HockeyDad wrote:



he has none...
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

I didn't know that giving more money to the wealthy was even on the table. Are we talking just the top 1% or the whole upper class (top 20%)?

HockeyDad wrote:



You should watch a republican debate or two. They have one every couple days or so. Tax cuts for 'job creators' are one of their favorite topics.
wheelrite
14 years ago

You should watch a republican debate or two. They have one every couple days or so. Tax cuts for 'job creators' are one of their favorite topics.

FuzzNJ wrote:



btw,
Which Poor Person ever gave you a job ?
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

btw,
Which Poor Person ever gave you a job ?

wheelrite wrote:



None. This supports your position how exactly?
HockeyDad
14 years ago

You should watch a republican debate or two. They have one every couple days or so. Tax cuts for 'job creators' are one of their favorite topics.

FuzzNJ wrote:




I just don't watching a Republican debate fitting in my busy schedule. Besides, I'm under the Obama Cone of Protection. At some point that I think Obama could lose his re-election, I'll begin evaluating other cones of protection and making a determination on exactly how many minutes it will take to switch.
Brewha
14 years ago

What's your point?

HockeyDad wrote:


Ok – I guess we all know you’re a fascist puppet.

Just skip the posting and call me Dr. Obvious . . . . .
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Ok – I guess we all know you’re a fascist puppet.

Just skip the posting and call me Dr. Obvious . . . . .

Brewha wrote:




Are there any other names you would like to call me while you struggle to defend your position as anything other than pure jealousy?
Brewha
14 years ago

Are there any other names you would like to call me while you struggle to defend your position as anything other than pure jealousy?

HockeyDad wrote:



Even if I did have other names – it is not like you would help me spell them . . . . .

So now when Republicans have told us it’s time to ‘take our country back’ you would characterize the calls for reform as acts of jealousy. That is some weak talk . . . .

ZRX1200
14 years ago
Thank the poor for buying cigarettes and lotto tickets and helping a little there at least. Lazy bassturds.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Even if I did have other names – it is not like you would help me spell them . . . . .

So now when Republicans have told us it’s time to ‘take our country back’ you would characterize the calls for reform as acts of jealousy. That is some weak talk . . . .

Brewha wrote:




You aren't trying to take our country back. You're just sitting on the couch screaming and shaking your fist while calling for more fairness to be levied against those who are better off than you.
Brewha
14 years ago

You aren't trying to take our country back. You're just sitting on the couch screaming and shaking your fist while calling for more fairness to be levied against those who are better off than you.

HockeyDad wrote:



But enough about me – As normal I don’t think you have weighed in on this one.

Do you think the poor pay their fair share?
MikeyRavioli
14 years ago
So nevermind waste. Nevermind corruption.

Your solution is people who earn more should pay more while people who earn less should get more handed to them?

Work hard = have $$$ taken from you
Work less = have $$$ given to you

Thats basically your system. the government doesnt actually earn any money. Every penny that gets handed out to help anyone gets taken away from someone else first.

Perhaps the key to solving this problem is reducing the amount of people who need help thus allowing other people to keep more of the money they earn.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

So nevermind waste. Nevermind corruption.

Your solution is people who earn more should pay more while people who earn less should get more handed to them?

Work hard = have $$$ taken from you
Work less = have $$$ given to you

Thats basically your system.

MikeyRavioli wrote:




That's called "progressive".
Users browsing this topic