DrafterX
14 years ago

Interesting ethics conversation emerging here.

If its racist for one person to make hateful comments based soley on the color of some ones skin then is it not equally racist to for a second person to feel the need to defend that person based soley on skin color?

My guess is most of the people attacking Michele Obama's duplicity would atttack her regardless of color. I am not sure that her defenders would be so quick to come to her aid if she was white.

Hillary Clinton got ragged her for years. Palin gets shredded even though she holds no office.

Its racist to bomb on Michele becuase she's black. Its not racist if you bomb on her because you hate what she stands for and she happens to be black.

MikeyRavioli wrote:





must be that damn white guilt thing again..... 🤐
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism.

pdxstogieman wrote:




You're an idiot.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago
Would be interesting to see all the black people that frequent this board weigh in on this topic.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

You're an idiot.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



You have a nice day too. What was I thinking, saying that cbid message boards reflect the spectrum of attitudes present in society in general?
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Would be interesting to see all the black people that frequent this board weigh in on this topic.

pdxstogieman wrote:




I firmly believe they'd see right past the whole color issue that you want to wrap yourself around and get down to the meat of what she is and how she presents herself.

She's a disgrace regardless if she's stripped, purple, polka-dotted or any other spectrum of the rainbow but you won't call her out on her behaviors because you're the same way. You defend this poor choice with your hinted at racism like the guy that yells "FIRE!" in a movie theater is covered by Free Speech. It doesn't work there either!

Now you're on your knees meely-mouthing about how black people feel about her? They hate her too!

She's talked down to us and acted more like Marie Antoinette with her "Let them eat cake" since becoming First Lady. Have you been on a real vacation since Obama has been President? Not that fake ass Disney World crap. I'm talking about an African Safari or staying on Martha's Vineyard renting a house for 50K a week kind of vacation? No, you haven't. While the American people wanted Hope and Change he's busy taking "Date Night" and every other kind of vacation or golf outing. He doesn't care and neither does she. Birds of a feather carpetbagging their way through a failed administration on every level while you want to make it a race issue.


You REALLY are an idiot.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

You have a nice day too. What was I thinking, saying that cbid message boards reflect the spectrum of attitudes present in society in general?

pdxstogieman wrote:




You're a really great slouch[frypan]
MikeyRavioli
14 years ago
Every time Bush took a vacation, went to Camp David, or played a round of golf it was reported in every news outlet. There were sites that had running totals. Lefty posters here created a new thread every time.

The Obama family has taken waaaaay more vacation time then Bush did. Obama plays waaaay more golf. But you don't see it given the same attention in the media.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

You're a really great slouch[frypan]

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Quit stealing my lines.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Quit stealing my lines.

pdxstogieman wrote:




Not your line.

Stop pretending you're Brian Doyle-Murray or Harold Ramis. You're not. You're not that good at humor. Matter of fact you're not good at anything!
DrafterX
14 years ago
I heard God hates slouches.... 😟
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

I'm reminded of this, when I think of her ...

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/29981/original.jpg 

jetblasted wrote:



You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.
DrafterX
14 years ago

You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.

FuzzNJ wrote:




they must have been trying to make fun of her weight to then..... 😟
FuzzNJ
14 years ago



But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?


tailgater wrote:



um, yes.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

You do realize that cover was intended to make fun of all the people who are and have been characterizing the first family as terrorist, angry, black, muslims, right? It didn't work all that well because the dolts on the right took it seriously.

FuzzNJ wrote:




I have no response to that.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

I firmly believe they'd see right past the whole color issue that you want to wrap yourself around and get down to the meat of what she is and how she presents herself.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



lol.


She's talked down to us and acted more like Marie Antoinette with her "Let them eat cake" since becoming First Lady. Have you been on a real vacation since Obama has been President? Not that fake ass Disney World crap. I'm talking about an African Safari or staying on Martha's Vineyard renting a house for 50K a week kind of vacation? No, you haven't. While the American people wanted Hope and Change he's busy taking "Date Night" and every other kind of vacation or golf outing. He doesn't care and neither does she. Birds of a feather carpetbagging their way through a failed administration on every level while you want to make it a race issue.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



My aren't you jealous of the wife of the most powerful man on the planet. Go get a job and become really successful and you too can live well.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago



The Obama family has taken waaaaay more vacation time then Bush did.

MikeyRavioli wrote:



Dude, where the f are you getting this from? Totally untrue. WTF?
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

lol.



My aren't you jealous of the wife of the most powerful man on the planet. Go get a job and become really successful and you too can live well.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Yeah...real laughfest.

You want to tear down Wall Street from the confines of your sofa but won't recognize that as America is in the midst of a depression the Kenyan King and Co. are busy racking up bills at taxpayer's expense.

Eat your own gruel.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Yeah...real laughfest.

You want to tear down Wall Street from the confines of your sofa but won't recognize that as America is in the midst of a depression the Kenyan King and Co. are busy racking up bills at taxpayer's expense.

Eat your own gruel.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Such jealousy. Blame yourself if you can't afford nice vacations. They pay for all their own stuff except for transportation and security, that comes with the job for Democratic and Republican presidents.
tailgater
14 years ago

As Tye said to Judge Smails, "Don't sell yourself short. You're a really great slouch", or in this case, artist. And I'd have to say like an El Greco, your paintings are distorted.

You make the assertion, "It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America". That's not obvious or in any way something that could be construed by a reasonable person from what I actually said. What would actually be correct is that I attribute to some degree SOME of the negative things said about a black person in America to racism. For example, I think OJ Simpson is a murderer and pretty vile. I don't consider vast majority of negative statements about him to have any underlying basis in racism.

You go on to say, "But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards". That may be what you clearly take away as an implication of my statement, but that's not the case. I'm saying exactly what the words say. Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism. Are you saying that there is no racism at play either in American society or on the cbid message boards at all? Like Lake Woebegone, the cbid message board is some kind of oasis of perfection where all the children are above average.

And then add this nugget, "But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint". I posed the question it didn't expose anything. After you replied, I responded with my thoughts on the subject, and cited some non-racial factors that motivated strong negative emotions by some as well as race as one contributing factor in the reactions of some to one degree or another. If you consider that an "ugly viewpoint" then so be it. It's not an ugly viewpoint. It's a reality. It's not "my deepest, darkest little secret". If you don't think it comes into play at all, ever, by anybody, and that cbid is immune to it then I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.

As to your misguided and incorrect summation:
=================
"I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them".
===================
It would be awesome if you could actually read minds as you purport to do. So I've "decided to attack all injustices for them" because I have so little regard for black people? So in your mind responding to one thread on cbid is deciding to "attack all injustices"? By your reasoning, If someone sees an injustice that doesn't affect them, and they don't condone that injustice or they support someone or the group affected by the injustice then they're showing disregard for that person or group? So by that logic a person in Nazi germany hiding Jews from the authorities would be an anti-semite because they would be showing a disregard for their ability to stand up for themselves.

By your logic racism is a positive character building tool.

pdxstogieman wrote:



Yawn.
To keep it simple, I'll address your last pathetic attempt to save face.
I say "attack all injustices" as it relates to this thread. I don't suggest that you extend this charity to your everyday life. You don't have the passion for that.

Likewise, my comments are based on this thread. On some other thread I may agree with you and we'll be singing kumbaya and smoking cigars.
But on this thread, where you tried to be subtle about your racist viewpoints, and it back fired, you are officially pwned.
I do feel sorry for you because you did introduce race when it was not even on the radar. It's a cheap street performers trick, a slight of hand so to speak, that the liberal left use all too often.

I say "bravo" when I'm being sarcastic.
What I mean is "pathetic".
And to steal your words: Low Class.
No quotation marks required.

pdxstogieman
14 years ago

Not your line.

Stop pretending you're Brian Doyle-Murray or Harold Ramis. You're not. You're not that good at humor. Matter of fact you're not good at anything!

DrMaddVibe wrote:



In the context of this thread I used it first, with due attribution.

You're an idiot.
Users browsing this topic