Kawak
  • Kawak
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago
I love how Breitbarts team lets Liberals fall on their own swords! This could not have gone any better for Mr. Pollack. As usual the Libby reporters don't do their homework about guests or subjects! Unless you count what Media Matters supplies them!

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/08/The%20Vetting%20CNN%20Implodes%20Over%20Obama%20Bell%20Video 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/03/08/Soledad%20OBrien%20Was%20A%20Derrick%20Bell%20Fan 

http://www.breitbart.com/ 

http://news.yahoo.com/breitbarts-last-depth-interview-msnbc-plot-paint-obama-001006386.html 

Get the popcorn!
rfenst
14 years ago

I love how Breitbarts team lets Liberals fall on their own swords! This could not have gone any better for Mr. Pollack. As usual the Libby reporters don't do their homework about guests or subjects! Unless you count what Media Matters supplies them!

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/08/The%20Vetting%20CNN%20Implodes%20Over%20Obama%20Bell%20Video 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/03/08/Soledad%20OBrien%20Was%20A%20Derrick%20Bell%20Fan 

http://www.breitbart.com/ 

http://news.yahoo.com/breitbarts-last-depth-interview-msnbc-plot-paint-obama-001006386.html 

Get the popcorn!

Kawak wrote:



What are those links about- before I take the time to watch them?
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

What are those links about- before I take the time to watch them?

rfenst wrote:




Use the Google.

Too bad you didn't waaaay back when. As a result we have the Kenyan King and his henchmen.
rfenst
14 years ago

Use the Google.

Too bad you didn't waaaay back when. As a result we have the Kenyan King and his henchmen.

DrMaddVibe wrote:




OK. You finally win: Obama won because I voted for him.
Now, if you will just give me another few days I will decide who our next President will be!




[sarcasm]
FuzzNJ
14 years ago
Breitbart using race again. Oh no, Obama hugged a black professor who had views that we don't get nor understand. He must want to kill all white people. The horror.
daveincincy
14 years ago

Breitbart using race again. Oh no, Obama hugged a black professor who had views that we don't get nor understand. He must want to kill all white people. The horror.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Are you saying this is a black thing, and we wouldn't understand? 😰
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Are you saying this is a black thing, and we wouldn't understand? 😰

daveincincy wrote:



No, I'm saying it's a scholarly thing, and you wouldn't understand.
daveincincy
14 years ago
thank God I'm not a scholar. You can't tell them anything...they think they know EVERYTHING.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

No, I'm saying it's a scholarly thing, and you wouldn't understand.

FuzzNJ wrote:



Nobody's asking for Debbie Field's Chocolate Chip recipe or anything so I really don't believe for one flipping' second that YOU would be in any possession of any type of useful "scholary knowledge"!

Just like the Nickelodeon turned CNN "anchor" didn't cough up that she was biased in her "interview".

Amazing how the "free" press isn't so free, and when it's there for all to see you go all in with the "turtle act" and run for your shell.
dubleuhb
14 years ago

Breitbart using race again. Oh no, Obama hugged a black professor who had views that we don't get nor understand. He must want to kill all white people. The horror.

FuzzNJ wrote:


Fuzz using race again, anytime someone criticizes Obama it's because they are racist. Anything new ? It's not the hug, although it makes sense, but the association with this guy and his racist view of America. 🐮
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Fuzz using race again, anytime someone criticizes Obama it's because they are racist. Anything new ? It's not the hug, although it makes sense, but the association with this guy and his racist view of America. 🐮

dubleuhb wrote:




Another brick in the "wall".

They'll turn their head because he's one of "theirs". They offer support and cover. Sad thing is they'll do all of that and the Kenyan King wouldn't even fart in the same room as them. That's how full of contempt he is!
jetblasted
14 years ago

thank God I'm not a scholar. You can't tell them anything...they think they know EVERYTHING.

daveincincy wrote:


+1
daveincincy
14 years ago
I can't wait to have a white guy back in the office of President. That way we can talk bad about him and the crappy job he's doing, and not be called a racist. [frypan]
Kawak
  • Kawak
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago
What's really awesome is the fact if you read more and then look into Mr. Pollack. He is actually married to a really hot black women! So the fact that neither of these blithering Liberal idots did any research and yet made him out to be racists is to funny.

Oh and for you Libs, yes that gives him cred just like when you white libs yell racism at every turn you think somehow that gives you street cred and free tickets to a 50 cent show.
jpotts
14 years ago

Breitbart using race again. Oh no, Obama hugged a black professor who had views that we don't get nor understand. He must want to kill all white people. The horror.

FuzzNJ wrote:




I understand the man's views. He believes that the rule of law is secondary to external factors like "social justice." And that when a judge rules from the bench, he should impose prevailing leftist attitudes as opposed to what the law states.

So, if black people are oppressed, and a black guy kills his white neighbor in a fit of anger, the black guy should be let go because his people are "oppressed."

What's the point of having laws if they can be countermanded by transient social concerns? The answer is: there is no point.

And what if the wind of those social concerns blow in the opposite direction (as winds sometimes do)? Well, it may lead to the EXACT opposite of what was intended. Because it is human nature for people to take the path of least resistence, and that often means following process as opposed to conscience. And when the process is that you subjugate the freedoms of others to what the current social trend may be, you can go from excusing one race of all it's ills, to executing them in droves.

And this black professor "teaches" law. Frankly speaking, they should have taking him up on his numerous threats to leave a long time ago. He was an angry black socialist with cottage cheese for an intellect.

There's a reason why the lady holding the balance on the front of the courthouse has a blindfold over her eyes. And it isn't so that she can't see the truth.

Fuzz, you are a complete idiot.
jpotts
14 years ago
"How can you call yourself an intellectual and not find anti-Semitism nauseating?”


Henry Louis Gates to Bell.
daveincincy
14 years ago

What's really awesome is the fact if you read more and then look into Mr. Pollack. He is actually married to a really hot black women! So the fact that neither of these blithering Liberal idots did any research and yet made him out to be racists is to funny.

Kawak wrote:




OMG...if that is true then I can see how it was even easier for Mr. Pollack to stay composed. Nothing like giving all of those accusers a little more rope to hang themselves. đŸ€Š Classic!
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago
Derrick Bell in 1994: ‘Jewish Neoconservative Racists’

The controversy over the videotape of Harvard Law School student Barack Obama speaking in support of his professor Derrick Bell during Bell’s one-man 1990 uprising against the law school’s failure or refusal to hire a black woman as a professor has caused a predictable back-and-forth about what it might mean for Obama to have a favorable view of Bell. Michael Powell of the New York Times reflected conventional opinion in liberal media circles when he tweeted: “Derrick Bell, Radical? We’re to pretend our history cleansed? He fought 4 Civil Rights in Mississippi.”

It is incumbent on Powell and others, if they want to get in on the conversation about Bell, to explain what on earth is mainstream about comments he made in an eye-opening New York Observer interview published on October 10, 1994, that is not available online. Among other remarks, Bell denounced Henry Louis (Skip) Gates for writing a New York Times op-ed condemning black anti-Semitism:

I was furious. Even if everything he said was true, it was inexcusable not to mention what might have motivated blacks to feel this way, and to fail to talk about all the Jewish neoconservative racists who are undermining blacks in every way they can.

Bell went on to say, “Now, that wouldn’t excuse anti-Semitism, which is awful, but it would at least provide a context for this anger
”


It might seem nice of Bell to acknowledge the awfulness of anti-Semitism, but he didn’t mean it. The very same interview began as follows: “We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we’ve got them.” Khalid Muhammad was Farrakhan’s right hand, who made a name for himself referring to Jews as, among many other things, “bloodsuckers” whose “father was the devil.” As for Farrakhan, if you need a refresher course in his vileness, look here.

Why exactly were we supposed to appreciate them? Quoth Bell: “While these guys talk a lot, they don’t do anything. The new crop of leaders are going to be a lot more dangerous and radical, and the next phase will probably be led by charismatic individuals, maybe teenagers, who urge that instead of killing each other, they should go out in gangs and kill a whole lot of white people.”

Note how he seemed to relish this prospect even as he tut-tutted it. Note also how almost unimaginably wrong he was. For no marauding gangs of black teenagers went around killing white people after he spoke; in fact, the ongoing crime drop that followed his words had its most remarkable impact in black communities, where the number of murders fell, by some counts, as much as 80 percent over the decade that followed.

And of course, 18 years after he spoke these words, a black man who gave him a nice hug back in 1990 was elected president of the United States.

Bell, in the same interview: “Blacks will simply never gain full equality in this country.”


http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/09/derrick-bell-jewish-neoconservative-racists/ 




All in all it's just a...nuther brick in the Wall.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago
The Racist Ravings of Derrick Bell


By now, you may already have seen the 1991 video footage of Barack Obama, who was then a 30-year-old student at Harvard Law School, speaking in glowing terms about Harvard professor Derrick Bell, whom Obama described as a man known for “speaking the truth” and for an “excellence of 
 scholarship” that had not only “opened up new vistas and new horizons,” but had “changed the standards [of what] legal writing is about.” “Open up your hearts and your minds to the words of Professor Derrick Bell,” Obama urged the sizable crowd which had gathered to show their support for Professor Bell that day.

Since the release of the video, Obama’s backers have been quick to dismiss it as nothing more than a young scholar’s affectionate tribute to a liberal academic icon who not only made major intellectual contributions to his profession, but who also was a leading champion of racial “diversity” in higher education. For instance, CNN host Soledad O’Brien, when interviewing Breitbart.com’s editor-in-chief Joel Pollak yesterday about the significance of the video, described Bell benignly as “the first tenured African American professor of law at Harvard University,” and characterized the gathering merely as “a rally in support of racial equality among the faculty at Harvard Law School.” O’Brien then asked her guest, with apparent bewilderment, “What part of that was the bombshell? Because I missed it. I don’t get it. What was a bombshell?”

In a similar spirit of willful blindness, Media Matters describes Derrick Bell as “a respected academic” and “an influential figure in the Civil Rights movement.” This portrayal is reminiscent of Barack Obama’s pathetic characterization, a few years back, of Bill Ayers as “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” But just as the reality of Bill Ayers was far more interesting than Obama indicated at that time, the truth about Derrick Bell is likewise far more compelling than the pablum the left has provided in the wake of this latest video. For you see, by the time Barack Obama was delivering his glowing remarks about Derrick Bell in 1991, the professor had already established—and would continue to cultivate for another two decades—a reputation as someone who thoroughly, resolutely detested the United States and who viewed the nation’s institutions and its people as irremediably racist. In short, until his death last October at the age of 80, Bell was secular academia’s version of Jeremiah Wright—a raging, fulminating racist without the clergyman’s robe. And something about his philosophy resonated strongly with Barack Obama.

Derrick Bell is best known as the founding father of Critical Race Theory, an academic discipline which maintains that society is divided along racial lines into (white) oppressors and (black) victims, similar to the way Marxism frames the oppressor/victim dichotomy along class lines. Critical Race Theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently its legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid. A logical derivative of this premise, according to Critical Race Theory, is that the members of “oppressed” racial groups are entitled—in fact obligated—to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing. Such a perspective’s implications for the ability of civil society to function at all, are nothing short of monumental.


http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/09/barack-obamas-first-jeremiah-wright/ 


But...but...but Snickerdoodles thinks it's Breitbart? The reporter's version of Jesus...back from the dead to rule the Earth.




[frypan] [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]


Yes, I too love it when it all falls into place and the thoughtless minions like Snickerdoodles expose themselves for what they are out in the open!
Users browsing this topic