You don't get it. The girl doesn't exist at all. The facebook acct was created right before the attempts to spread false information, and a stock photo was added to the account. Once someone found the stock photo, whoever created the fake account shut down the account.

It would be like Cbid creating a user-account and posting stuff like "The Platinum membership definitely exists, a friend of mine got his card in the mail 2 weeks ago". or some other sort of disinformation. Does it mean it's ChikFilA? Not necessarily, but you'd think it's someone looking to try to spread an alternate potential rumor. Most likely to profit would be CFA.

victor809 wrote:

That's actually a great example of why I think it WASN'T the company.

CBid wouldn't do that because it wouldn't be a worthwhile effort.
But a proponent of CBid would.

You and jizzy-jazz website believe it was chick themselves, so you perpetuate it as if it's true.

In the end, who cares? It has NOTHING to do with the OUTRAGEOUS hypocrisy and blatant PC favoritism being used by people in power in these big cities.
This should make you sick, but because you agree with them politically you'd rather cry about a fake facebook account.

I'll say one thing: You're filling in for fuzzy pretty good!
[whip]

tailgater wrote:

So you actually can't find any instance of gay marriage in the Bible? +1 to Chick-Fil-A

HockeyDad wrote:

I have already pointed it out, you simply chose not to accept it. +2 for Chik-Fil-A because people will believe what ever they are told to believe.

SammyETN wrote:

No, just saying the usage of certain terms means certain things. Like calling someone a cigar smoker means that person smokes cigars.

SammyETN wrote:

Wait till Biggus hears of this!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I have already pointed it out, you simply chose not to accept it. +2 for Chik-Fil-A because people will believe what ever they are told to believe.

SammyETN wrote:

Make up your mind. Does the Bible say they had a gay marriage or not? Do you really think the powers that be would have left that in and not redacted it. Come on now.

It starting to sound like gay-homo militant extremism.....we found a gay marriage in the Bible....we found one...kinda...maybe.

HockeyDad wrote:

Which one does he support?

1) Polygamous - David had many wives, Jacob had four and Solomon had over seven hundred.

2) Levirate - Man must marry his widowed sister-in-law. Deut. 25: 5-10

3)Prisoner of War - Kill every one except the female vigins in wartime then make them your wives. Numbers 31: 1-18

4) Slave - Exodus 21: 1-6



Wait, I have no pictures, so I guess this doesn't count. Never mind.#-o

SammyETN wrote:

Sammy,
My point is that the company is being literally banned for nothing greater than an owners own belief.
This is a slippery slope.

If chik fil-a discriminated when hiring or serving customers then it would be a different story altogether.

tailgater wrote:

Nobody here, including you, will believe anything that they do not wish to regardless of the facts put before them. Personally, I believe that if the Lord Jesus himself descended from on high and told you they did have aa fifteen year gay relationship, you would want to see his identifaction and would then demand proof.

SammyETN wrote:

My only problem with it is that if he had said he thought blacks should still be slaves, everyone would be up in arms. Since it was the queers however, he is the one that is being targeted and not the gay people.

SammyETN wrote:

So you actually can't find any instance of gay marriage in the Bible? +1 to Chick-Fil-A

HockeyDad wrote:

Seems to me the motto around here should be hate the gays regardless of the topic.

SammyETN wrote:

Nobody here, including you, will believe anything that they do not wish to regardless of the facts put before them. Personally, I believe that if the Lord Jesus himself descended from on high and told you they did have aa fifteen year gay relationship, you would want to see his identifaction and would then demand proof.

SammyETN wrote: