:-k
just remembered something that happened here a few years ago.... there is an Italian resturant we ate at about once a week or so... good food.. prices weren't too bad... one day my boss finds out the owner and about half his staff marched in some gay-homo pride parade thing and we havn't eaten there since... the gay-homo thing kindof back-fired on them.... 🤔

DrafterX wrote:

Balls.....figures

HockeyDad wrote:

(well, at least I wouldn’t eat the chief).

Brewha wrote:

I honestly don't know if I believe any of these places have actually been blocked. For the very reason that there aren't any Lawyers running around looking for a percentage. A mayor can say all they want about a particular business not belonging in their fair city. That doesn't mean that the business is going to be denied any particular license without cause. If they did that it would create an automatic opening for a lawyer to make some $$, and we all know there isn't a lawyer that can't resist jumping for $$.

I'd need proof to believe that this is anything more than posturing by a politician. Hell, for Chicago and whatever other cities, do we even know if ChikFliA even has applied for any licenses to operate or even wants to open a store there?

victor809 wrote:

http://gizmodo.com/5928926/chick+fil+a-got-caught-pretending-to-be-a-fake-teenage-girl-on-facebook
Whatever...
I don't care what your views on chik-fil-a are, this PR stunt they attempted is hilarious.

victor809 wrote:

Funny thing is, chick fil-a is not being accused of discrimination.

The owner simply stated in an interview that he believes in the traditional (biblical) family.

tailgater wrote:

...and now the gay-homo militant extremists want to nail him to a cross.

HockeyDad wrote:

Couple things, Vic:

1. You're accusing them of pretending to be a teenage girl, then you use the term "whatever..."
2. What makes anyone think this was the company themselves? If the girl is against the gay backlash she could have made that crap up just to make a point. Doesn't me "she" works for them. That's a HUGE stretch. And to call it a PR Stunt? I mean, other than the super sensitive web lurkers, who the hell would have seen the posts?
3. gizmodo.com? Is that the sister site to TW's favorite site: mondo-jizz.com ?

tailgater wrote:

maybe it was just some fat chick that didn't want to post her own pic..??

DrafterX wrote:

Does it mean it's ChikFilA? Not necessarily, but you'd think it's someone looking to try to spread an alternate potential rumor. Most likely to profit would be CFA.

victor809 wrote:

It was most likely a gay-homo militant extremist.

HockeyDad wrote:

prolly one of them clopper dudes.... 😟

DrafterX wrote: