DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

:-k 🤔
when did we personally attack Sammy the gay nark..?? I didn't intend to if I did... I always thought he was a good guy... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




No harm no foul...it was the ghey. It got on you and went to you head. You can just wipe it off...avatar change in 3...2...Here, I'll take a bit.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
I AIN'T SKEERED!
DrafterX
13 years ago
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

😟

DrafterX wrote:




rinse lather repeat
DrafterX
13 years ago
damn man.... I think you really upset him this time.... 🤦
HockeyDad
13 years ago

rinse lather repeat

DrMaddVibe wrote:




That reminds me.....I got my hair cut and styled today by a chick. Can't be too safe.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

damn man.... I think you really upset him this time.... 🤦

DrafterX wrote:




ME??!!!


I din't call him anything!

YOU DID!


Besides...he's ordained like me...we can forgive each other for trespassing and stuff.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

damn man.... I think you really upset him this time.... 🤦

DrafterX wrote:




It's your fault. He's prolly emailing rfenst right now.
DrafterX
13 years ago

That reminds me.....I got my hair cut and styled today by a chick. Can't be too safe.

HockeyDad wrote:




Did she make you a sammich too..?? 😕
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

That reminds me.....I got my hair cut and styled today by a chick. Can't be too safe.

HockeyDad wrote:




...and that's why you reached down there and gave her the ol' Crocodile Dundee affirmation shake?


Cue some greasy porno music....:-({|=
HockeyDad
13 years ago


Besides...he's ordained like me...we can forgive each other for trespassing and stuff.

DrMaddVibe wrote:




Yeah but can he lead you not into temptation....
DrafterX
13 years ago

It's your fault. He's prolly emailing rfenst right now.

HockeyDad wrote:





😞
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Did she make you a sammich too..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:





That wold have been so awesome! She's a cutie!
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

It's your fault. He's prolly emailing rfenst right now.

HockeyDad wrote:




Why?

We didn't run over him or throw him off a building!

I know...let's try oout the super powers of our new barrister...
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Yeah but can he lead you not into temptation....

HockeyDad wrote:




We'll leave the Deliverance for FGM and Mattie![whip]
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Why?

We didn't run over him or throw him off a building!

DrMaddVibe wrote:




I read on the internets that the gays all check in there before leaving.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

I read on the internets that the gays all check in there before leaving.

HockeyDad wrote:




Motel 6?


Hotel California?


Facebook?
DrafterX
13 years ago
and they're off..!!!!



Legal eagles cry fowl over politicians' plans to block Chick-fil-A


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/26/politician-plan-to-block-chick-fil-is-unconstitutional-legal-experts-say/#ixzz21lLTApLk 



As Chicago became the latest city to tell Chick-fil-A it isn't welcome because its president doesn't support gay marriage, legal experts said the communities don't have a drumstick to stand on.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel became the second big-city mayor to blast the company over president Dan Cathy's comment last week that he is “guilty as charged” for supporting the traditional definition of marriage. Emanuel spoke up after Alderman Proco Joe Moreno announced he intends to block the chain from opening its second Chicago location over his stance.

But barring the popular fast-food restaurant over the personal views of Cathy is an “open and shut” discrimination case, legal scholars told FoxNews.com.

“The government can regulate discrimination in employment or against customers, but what the government cannot do is to punish someone for their words,” said Adam Schwartz, senior attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. “When an alderman refuses to allow a business to open because its owner has expressed a viewpoint the government disagrees with, the government is practicing viewpoint discrimination.”


"What the government cannot do is to punish someone for their words.”
- Adam Schwartz, American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois


The ACLU “strongly supports” same-sex marriage, Schwartz said, but noted that if a government can exclude a business for being against same-sex marriage, it can also exclude a business for being in support of same-sex marriage.

“But we also support the First Amendment,” he said. “We don’ think the government should exclude Chick-fil-A because of the anti-LGBT message. We believe this is clear cut.”

Jonathan Turley, a professor at the George Washington University Law School, said Moreno’s intentions raises “serious” constitutional concerns.

“It’s also a very slippery slope,” Turley told FoxNews.com. “If a City Council started to punish companies because of the viewpoints of their chief operating officers, that would become a very long list of banned companies.”

If Moreno did indeed put such a plan into action, it would be “excessive and likely unconstitutional,” Turley said



Film at 11..... 😟
DrafterX
13 years ago

Motel 6?


Hotel California?


Facebook?

DrMaddVibe wrote:





the Frankenstein place...
jojoc
13 years ago

and they're off..!!!!



Legal eagles cry fowl over politicians' plans to block Chick-fil-A


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/26/politician-plan-to-block-chick-fil-is-unconstitutional-legal-experts-say/#ixzz21lLTApLk 



As Chicago became the latest city to tell Chick-fil-A it isn't welcome because its president doesn't support gay marriage, legal experts said the communities don't have a drumstick to stand on.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel became the second big-city mayor to blast the company over president Dan Cathy's comment last week that he is “guilty as charged” for supporting the traditional definition of marriage. Emanuel spoke up after Alderman Proco Joe Moreno announced he intends to block the chain from opening its second Chicago location over his stance.

But barring the popular fast-food restaurant over the personal views of Cathy is an “open and shut” discrimination case, legal scholars told FoxNews.com.

“The government can regulate discrimination in employment or against customers, but what the government cannot do is to punish someone for their words,” said Adam Schwartz, senior attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. “When an alderman refuses to allow a business to open because its owner has expressed a viewpoint the government disagrees with, the government is practicing viewpoint discrimination.”

"What the government cannot do is to punish someone for their words.”
- Adam Schwartz, American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois


The ACLU “strongly supports” same-sex marriage, Schwartz said, but noted that if a government can exclude a business for being against same-sex marriage, it can also exclude a business for being in support of same-sex marriage.

“But we also support the First Amendment,” he said. “We don’ think the government should exclude Chick-fil-A because of the anti-LGBT message. We believe this is clear cut.”

Jonathan Turley, a professor at the George Washington University Law School, said Moreno’s intentions raises “serious” constitutional concerns.

“It’s also a very slippery slope,” Turley told FoxNews.com. “If a City Council started to punish companies because of the viewpoints of their chief operating officers, that would become a very long list of banned companies.”

If Moreno did indeed put such a plan into action, it would be “excessive and likely unconstitutional,” Turley said



Film at 11..... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




who would'a thought that the ACLU would be backing (sort of) the Christian views expressed by a very public Christian business owner. what is this world coming to. does this mean I can no longer hate on the ACLU?
Users browsing this topic