Chick-fil-A Under Siege by .... · Page 25

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

rfenst
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#481

Once again you are spot on.

My Libness may need that help.

teedubbya wrote:

Didn't you here?
Libness is going to be included in the next revision of DSMV-IV or DSMV-V, whichever they decide to publish next! It is going to be a classified mental illness like homosexuality used to be before it was de-listed.

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#482

Not true. I was out shopping for a new vehicle and I bought one. It is the kind of vehicle that would turn a gay guy straight. (Yes, driving the right vehicle can cure the gay choice.)

HockeyDad wrote:

Was it a Honda Element? I hear those gear shifts sticking out of the dash/console do a great job of turning gay men straight.

Edited by user 13 years ago | Reason: Not specified

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#483

rfenst wrote:

Oh geez.....don't be all bruised and such. We already got Sammy pouting.

Did you ever consider that if everyone turned gay tomorrow, the entire human species would be wiped out in one generation? ...and we want to call that perfectly normal!

DadZilla3
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#484

Did you ever consider that if everyone turned gay tomorrow, the entire human species would be wiped out in one generation? ...and we want to call that perfectly normal!

HockeyDad wrote:

Two guys getting busy together is definitely not normal. Two women, however...👍

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#485

Two women, however...👍

DadZilla3 wrote:

Well that's just good clean entertainment! Everybody knows that!

wheelrite
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#486

Two guys getting busy together is definitely not normal. Two women, however...👍

DadZilla3 wrote:

or Two Girls and a GRILL...

wheelrite
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#487

Two guys getting busy together is definitely not normal. Two women, however...👍

DadZilla3 wrote:

Btw,

All women are Lesbos and whores...[whip]

gringococolo
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#488

I thought gay-homoism was more like a defect, not a mental illness. Ya know like an astigmatism. Can't see straight or whatever.

DrMaddVibe
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#489

I thought gay-homoism was more like a defect, not a mental illness. Ya know like an astigmatism. Can't see straight or whatever.

gringococolo wrote:

If you read this entire thread...you're gonna LYMFAO!

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

13 years ago

#490

I thought gay-homoism was more like a defect, not a mental illness. Ya know like an astigmatism. Can't see straight or whatever.

gringococolo wrote:

it's a choice..😟

Edited by user 13 years ago | Reason: Not specified

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#491

HockeyDad wrote:

Yeah, but if everyone turned french tomorrow, it would be total chaos.
I mean, who would surrender to whom?

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#492

HockeyDad wrote:

A poor argument.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02785.x/abstract

Ultimately there are a number of traits which manage to remain inherited because there is a "net positive" effect. The classic example is sickle cell anemia in african populations (single gene carriers have a limited ability to survive malaria), look it up if you don't remember it from first year science.

The idea of the above study is that whatever gene is giving certain women increased fertility also led to a higher percentage of gay children (sons in this study). Overall, this would propagate both homosexuality and the species as a whole (a net positive, reproductively speaking).

Assuming that homosexuality is genetically based (as opposed to in utero developmentally based), then it would take someone very bad at math and statistics to believe that it isn't linked to some other trait which promotes the species, otherwise it would have been selected against over the evolution of the species. Since homosexuality is identified in other mammals, it is even more likely that the causes of homosexuality are rooted in our genes prior to the development of human beings (divergent vs convergent evolution. If it's gene based and exists in multiple species, what are the odds that they all developed this genetic trait independently? Unlikely.)

So.. .that's about as retarded a statement you can come up with. If everyone decided to get vasectomies tomorrow, the entire species would be wiped out too. But there are plenty of people who do that (and are allowed to marry).

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#493

Yeah, but if everyone turned french tomorrow, it would be total chaos.
I mean, who would surrender to whom?

tailgater wrote:

...but the wine, bread, and cheese would be to die for!

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#494

So.. .that's about as retarded a statement you can come up with. If everyone decided to get vasectomies tomorrow, the entire species would be wiped out too. But there are plenty of people who do that (and are allowed to marry).

victor809 wrote:

If everyone decided to get vasectomies tomorrow, the entire species would be wiped out. That would be a choice that went against natural biology....kinda like the ghey.

We allow vasectomies and you queers because the heteros make up for your slacking!

Clevon is lucky to be alive. He attempted to jump a jet ski from a lake into a swimming pool and impaled his crotch on an iron gate. But thanks to advances in stem cell research and the fine work of Doctors Krinsky and Altschuler, he should regain full reproductive function again.

gringococolo
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#495

Honestly, just having any "victorXXX" post, I feel like we are devolving.

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#496

HockeyDad wrote:

You're assuming gay is a choice.

If all you care about is that we have ample humans, then simply require a **** donation and artificially impregnate female "cows" to keep the species going.

Now your'e gonna say some bs about nature again, but it's pretty clear that you didn't even read the abstract of the study (let me guess, facts are biased!!!). The results suggest that the same factor which increases female fecundity increases male homosexuality in their offspring. This is the DEFINITION of natural. It means that the factor was actually selected for, as it gave the females increased number of children with fewer complications. So what if a few of the males don't breed, the population is limited by number of females and their breeding capability.

So... either read the study or say something stupid about french and globalism... I just don't care.

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#497

How can you spout that facts are biased crap and then start the next sentence with "The results suggest".

So you're saying we're getting better female fecundity by sacrificing a few male offspring to the ghey? That sounds like enough reason right there for Pfizer and Merck to get to work on the cure.

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#498

HockeyDad wrote:

Do you really think that we have even higher fertility on this planet right now?

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#499

Between hispanics and mormons were doing pretty good.......

DadZilla3
Herf-A-Holic

13 years ago

#500

I thought gay-homoism was more like a defect, not a mental illness. Ya know like an astigmatism. Can't see straight or whatever.

gringococolo wrote:

it's a choice..😟

DrafterX wrote:

...astigmatism is a choice? 🤔

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: