HockeyDad
13 years ago

I'd bet a dollah there are more hetero pedos than gay.....many MANY more in real numbers and percent

teedubbya wrote:




I would agree with that but we were talking about the Priesthood.
teedubbya
13 years ago

I would agree with that but we were talking about the Priesthood.

HockeyDad wrote:




yah... preists are different.
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Don't muddy the water, hatefulTW. Pedos must not be categorized.

So, Victor, there are "straight pedophile" men who like female children? Ok, sounds reasonable.
Problem is, you rarely if ever hear about that breed of "hetero" pedo, especially in the Catholic Church. The Church must be a magnet for only a small subset of (pedo) homos that love male children because as we are made to believe by pc concensus most pedos are not homosexual. Can't be. Homosexuals are our (hetero) clean cut, anal equivalents.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

yah... preists are different.

teedubbya wrote:




They got infiltrated by the gay-homo pedophiles. Prolly explains why the Boy Scouts are leery.
teedubbya
13 years ago
blood seems to want to tie pedo to homo though. must be because he is catholick or somethin.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

blood seems to want to tie pedo to homo though. must be because he is catholick or somethin.

teedubbya wrote:




I think there are separate regular gay-homos (good dressers), gay-homo pedophiles(carefully hide in society), and gay homo militant extremists (wear **** hats on their head in parades and don't eat ChickFila). Each chooses differently.
teedubbya
13 years ago


So, Victor, there are "straight pedophile" men who like female children? Ok, sounds reasonable.
.

bloody spaniard wrote:




Not only reasonable but more common. I thought you were kidding blood, but you really don't realize this?
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Not only reasonable but more common. I thought you were kidding blood, but you really don't realize this?

teedubbya wrote:




You took that out of context by dropping the next sentence. Fricking fencepost.
victor809
13 years ago

Don't muddy the water, hatefulTW. Pedos must not be categorized.

So, Victor, there are "straight pedophile" men who like female children? Ok, sounds reasonable.
Problem is, you rarely if ever hear about that breed of "hetero" pedo, especially in the Catholic Church. The Church must be a magnet for only a small subset of (pedo) homos that love male children because as we are made to believe by pc concensus most pedos are not homosexual. Can't be. Homosexuals are our (hetero) clean cut, anal equivalents.

bloody spaniard wrote:




check the links above. In a total of 7 seconds I was able to find 3 news reports of catholic priests molesting little girls.
teedubbya
13 years ago

Problem is, you rarely if ever hear about that breed of "hetero" pedo, especially in the Catholic Church. The Church must be a magnet for only a small subset of (pedo) homos that love male children because as we are made to believe by pc concensus most pedos are not homosexual. Can't be. Homosexuals are our (hetero) clean cut, anal equivalents.

bloody spaniard wrote:




actually adding the next sentance makes it worse. he tries to say most pedos are homo based on the catholic church
victor809
13 years ago

So that is like 1.8% straight pedo and 98.2% gay-homo pedo. I think you had your stats reversed earlier.

HockeyDad wrote:



Those aren't the stats I made up.
(verified by snopes)
teedubbya
13 years ago
Are homosexual adults in general sexually attracted to children and are preadolescent children at greater risk of molestation from homosexual adults than from heterosexual adults? There is no reason to believe so. The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual (Groth & Gary, 1982, p. 147).
teedubbya
13 years ago
In a more recent literature review, Dr. Nathaniel McConaghy (1998) similarly cautioned against confusing homosexuality with pedophilia. He noted, "The man who offends against prepubertal or immediately postpubertal boys is typically not sexually interested in older men or in women" (p. 259).

This well known lack of a linkage between homosexuality and child molestation accounts for why relatively little research has directly addressed the issue. Proving something we already know simply isn't a priority. Indeed, a commentary that accompanied publication of the 1994 study by Jenny et al. in Pediatrics noted that debates about gay people as molesters "have little to do with everyday child abuse" and lamented that they distract lawmakers and the public from dealing with the real problem of children's sexual mistreatment (Krugman, 1994).

teedubbya
13 years ago
The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. Many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children





Was Chester the molester gay? I don't claim to have all the data or to have studied the subject but it is a no brainer that homosexuality and pedophilia are not directly linked and to me it's just silly.
victor809
13 years ago
Feel better now?

You realize that neither drafter, bloody or HD read any of what you just posted, right? Once it goes past 2 sentences their eyes glaze.
teedubbya
13 years ago
I know. But its still fun to put it out there.

Kind of like Wheel stating he thinks 1960s Impalas are ugly then saying his frined had a 1962 Impala that was beautiful. He'll never notice it but its still fun to point out.
teedubbya
13 years ago
I honestly can't beleive anyone seriously connects pedo and homo. I thought he was joking.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Feel better now?

You realize that neither drafter, bloody or HD read any of what you just posted, right? Once it goes past 2 sentences their eyes glaze.

victor809 wrote:




You talking about what TW wrote. I already agreed to one part of it where he was clear.

I feel better now knowing you didn't read what I posted. I'm going to blame that on your genetics.
wheelrite
13 years ago

I know. But its still fun to put it out there.

Kind of like Wheel stating he thinks 1960s Impalas are ugly then saying his frined had a 1962 Impala that was beautiful. He'll never notice it but its still fun to point out.

teedubbya wrote:



I thought he said 68 Impala...

I re-read it just now,,,

my bad,,,,
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Feel better now?
You realize that neither drafter, bloody or HD read any of what you just posted, right? Once it goes past 2 sentences their eyes glaze.

victor809 wrote:




Oh how terribly funny (and sanguine). No, really. LOL I speedread & write my equivalent of shorthand.
Look, I can only speak for myself. Yes, I am terribly shallow & like to encapsulate my responses within a few sentences. HD, on the other hand, is probably much more erudite & capable of responding in more detail than I. Mea culpacabra or something like that. Can't speak for Drafter. Not sure anybody can be THAT dumb at times on paper... prolly a math genius or good at inventing 'n such.




Ok, TW, you made the clear (and redundant) case that homosexuals are not necessarily pedophiles. Ok, so?
You're telling me that if pedophiles are not necessarily interested in mature versions of their (same sex) targets, they are not necessarily homosexual? Sorry, but to paraphrase Cletis, a penus is a penus is a penus, don't matter how big it is. (insert bucktooth guffaw in here)
Users browsing this topic