Huckabe is a politician and more connected than virtually any mayor in the country. Wgaf about mayors. My cousin is a mayor who really likes chick-fil-a and would welcome them in.

If you really believe only one side of the aisle is driving this you are a foo.

teedubbya wrote:

Boycott is done by people not spending money (maybe protesting).


NOT refusing permits by gov't officials based on political reasons.


LHD did in fact PWNED you yet again. He texted me thar he's singing Shaquille O'Neils famous "Tell me how my azz tastes" but hoping you don't extrapolate that to the wrong conclusion too.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Don't even try with the whole "I more intelligent elitist" angle. It is not becoming on you nor believable.

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position.

Once you created the distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version about the JCP boycott, you skipped right over attacking it and plugged it right into your double standard.

You got caught.

HockeyDad wrote:

Go top the JCP thread Victor ...........

ZRX1200 wrote:

It's been rumored they will.


Once again straw man it hasn't happened yet.


So much effort to make people here look the way you want them to, while they can just let you type for the same effect.

ZRX1200 wrote:

As you know he no longer holds office but you also know he is still very plugged in and may run again. Same for Palin et.al. And they unabashadly hold themselves out as rrpresenting the rigjt They are political and are representing/shaping one side/view.

If you are going to play the disingenuous game remember that when Jesse, Al gore, Sharpten etc act up. We will institute a new rule that only folks holding office are considered politicians.

teedubbya wrote:

And since I never ignored the original argument, but used the boycott as supporting evidence, it isn't a strawman argument.

victor809 wrote:

Oh come on... you tell me then, where did you stand on the boycotting of JCP?

victor809 wrote:

The very argument that this all occurred in a vacuum and the lefties made a big issue out of it while the right had nothing to do with it does just that.

teedubbya wrote:

Hd you do not define what I need to find or not. You may want to but you don't.

Those are politicians and are constantly either running for an office or leveraging political power. Most even have PACs. Under your narrow view Romney isn't a politician because he holds no office and hasn't for a long time. It's silly.

Perhaps we should stop calling Palin, Romney and Huckabe governor.

teedubbya wrote: