And yet you still "can't quit" us.........

ZRX1200 wrote:

I didn't say shame. Your reading tea leafs again.

ZRX1200 wrote:

I said I thought it was dumb. I thought it was dumb becauae of the context. She is very well liked (I do like some of her work in film and her show compared to other similar daytime fluff is decent) and only isolates them from who they should be trying to reach.

ZRX1200 wrote:

You and Sammy both can't seem to accept that people who disapprove of that lifestyle can be decent. And when they act like it it doesn't help their argument in my opinion. I think Sammy is fine, he's not in agreement with me but I still see no reason to think his due rescpect and value as a person are less.

I see you as as big a hypocrite as what you're pissed about.

ZRX1200 wrote:

You would think that "decent" folk who just don't approve of the lifestyle wouldn't care or have a fit just because of a choice of spokesmodel. But that's a whole other topic.

victor809 wrote:

Perhaps the issue here is that you expect me to think people are "decent" off the bat. I don't expect anyone (gay, straight, muslim, catholic or seikh) to be decent. People aren't decent and honestly don't deserve any value until they earn it. For a moment, imagine that you poked your head into this forum with the idea that individuals will earn respect (or not) based on the statements they post online here. How many individuals would you actually value at the end of 6+ years of reading the kind of sh%t that's posted here. And yes, I did get sick of it and leave for a long while.

victor809 wrote:

I don' think that we ever established that is was a whole other topic since you never could find it!

HockeyDad wrote:

Going through life assuming everyone is bad is a tough road to travel. Your litmus test that they might be good is that they 98.2% agree with you. You might want to do some soul searching.

HockeyDad wrote:

Don't be too hard on Victor, HD. He just wants a perfect world where we all think like he does. That's understandable. I don't have the answers but I know my lil' Victor does.... coochie coochie cooooooo...

bloody spaniard wrote:

that's incorrect.
I actually like people who can disagree with me without resorting to dogma. There are some individuals I find very interesting to speak with, and respect their opinion even when it disagrees with mine. Tail is a good example of that, on a number of occasions I am forced to agree with him.

victor809 wrote:

You just like him because I call him Honey Pot. I understand.

HockeyDad wrote:

Quote " Interestingly, we don't disagree here. You can support the right to do something and still feel shame that it even exists."

We then you (as in me) sure sounds like both of us Victor. I can read (a little) without pictures.


Too bad you have such pessimism to you fellow man. You and I differ how we view our precieved shortcomings of mankind. People should earn respect, but recieve a certain level of decency untill they prove they don't deserve that.

Not doing this is one of societies biggest shortcomings on all sides.

ZRX1200 wrote:

The bad thing is when everyone doesn't think like he does, instantly the disdain and intolerance comes out. Its just biter....errr...bitter.

HockeyDad wrote:

Perhaps the issue here is that you expect me to think people are "decent" off the bat. I don't expect anyone (gay, straight, muslim, catholic or seikh) to be decent. People aren't decent and honestly don't deserve any value until they earn it.

victor809 wrote:

My error in writing then. I intended the concept of agreement to essentially end at the period.

victor809 wrote:

Tailgater writes some lengthy stuff. Prolly wears out Victor.

bloody spaniard wrote:

So my lengthy stuff is wearing him out?
I never heard it put in those words, but thank you for noticing!

tailgater wrote:

Your posts are like a 12 round fight. Poor lumpy bas tard's walking in post holes by the 9th.

bloody spaniard wrote:

Your posts are like a 12 round fight. Poor lumpy bas tard's walking in post holes by the 9th.

bloody spaniard wrote:

I tend to write in bursts.
I can't always stay current in the banter, so I put all my thoughts into one or two posts. Believe it or not, they're sometimes edited (for content and to fit in the allotted time frame). This keeps jpotts as the perennial litmus test.

tailgater wrote: