Papachristou
IF A POLICE OFFICER WAS THREATENED THE SAME AS THE "GUN NUT' WAS
SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN THREATENED, HE WOULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED
EMPTYING HIS GUN AT THE GROUP IN THE CAR BECAUSE HE WAS WORRIED
HE MIGHT BE INJURED, AND HE HAS BEEN HIRED, BY HISLEGAL LOCAL
GOVERNMENT TO POLICE, AND AS THE VERB SAYS, TO MAINTAIN ORDER
AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
THE "GUN NUT" THAT MURDERED THE YOUNGSTER WHO WAS GOING FROM
ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER, WAS LOOKING FOR TROUBLE, HOPING TO FIND IT,
IN SPITE OF POLICE WARNINGS TO STAY AWAY, ONLY BECAUSE HE WAS
PACKING.
WHAT HAPPENED WHEN HE FOUND IT, THE CONFORTATION IS NOT IMPORTANT.
WITHOUT THE MIND SET OF THE "GUN NUT", THE FANTASY OFBEING A HERO,
LIKE THE HEROES OF THE OLD WEST, SAVING THE TOWN FROM TH3 BAD GUYS,
A YOUNGSTER WOULD BE ALIVE TODAY.
THE OTHER INCIDENT, THE "I TOLD YOU TO QUIET DOWN, AND SINCE YOU DIDN'T
YOU'RE GOING TO PAY THE CONSEQUENCES. I WILL PUNISH YOU BY TRYING
TO KILL YOU." IS BEYOND THE PALE,
IF YOU HAVE READ ENOUGH OF THE POTENTIAL "GUN NUTS" RESPONSES TO ANY
QUESTIONING OF THEIR RIGHT TO OWN ANY GUN OR WEAPON, YOU WILL FIND
THEY ARE SIMILAR, "ONE OF THESE DAYS, I AM GOING TO COME FACE TO FACE
WITH A BAD GUY, AND, BOY OH BOY, IS HE GOING TO BE SURPRISED,"[/color]
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
