my autopilot response to many (not all) questions is...why do you ask?

close. he actually has had every view about all things...at various times during various elections.

however, he has no lasting convictions (and I don't mean the charges were dropped either).

Could be cuz I am from Massachusetts, witnessed the act up close.

Wow.

Rick, even YOU of extreme bias should recognize that our sitting president was a complete JOKE as a Senator.

Take your shots at Romney because of your hatred of mormonism. But be careful when you criticize viewpoints and convictions.

Perhaps if Governor and Candidate Romney has simply stated "Present" to all the tough questions then you'd be smitten.

That's a joke.

As a mass-hole, you must then realize that since 85+% of our state legislature is Democrat, that a sitting Republican has to "go along to get along".
It's called compromise.

But with the liberal media feeding you sound bites, you fail to recognize that Romeny gets criticized for flip flopping when he DOES compromise, and then the GOP gets criticized for blocking progress when they don't.

I'd say that the liberals "can't have it both ways".
But, of course, I'd be mistaken on several different fronts....

More jealousy of liberals . . . .
You know they are much better dancers too.

you'd certainly be mistaken by assuming you know my opinions are determined by the "liberal media" any more than me assuming righty extremists have their opinions shaped by limited yet manipulative sources. Somehow you are able to resist what I am unable to sift through while living in the same state, exposed to the same media?

That said, I have known of and had interest (unexplainable yet true) in Mitt Romney since before he claimed he really really was a Mass-holer. Going along to get along happened after he won (finally) an election. Of course, because he has no real convictions the way you do, or I do, he had no real lasting interest in Massachusetts' future, he simply looked for legislation he could get approved (MUCH was unpoular among libs btw, the dems were more than equally kind to him as they always are to the many GOP Guvs we have had) just to build any kind of resume so he could immediately run for his next ego stroking office. Oh yeah, he lowered taxes while surrounded by tax and spend libs...yeah right. He also tripled, quadrupled and more fees and fines to raise revenue at the same time, hence his magical ability to work with the 85% Dem gov't. The late Jerry Williams on radio would have been screaming about "fees fines and taxes are all taxes".

But what he said before that campaign, hell even when he previously ran for Senator, to what he said early in the primaries, to what he said during the stretch run of this recent campaign...I simply can't find a divisive issue upon which he has not camped firmly on both sides.